@KMMaltaAirlines 3 emails sent, 4 hours on hold, and still getting the run-around. My luggage missed its connection and I just need my bag tag info. Three of my colleagues have already gotten theirs from you—why am I being ignored? What happening?
@MarizelB@EricLDaugh Oh snap, Denmark’s trash, so let’s swap for the US who sterilized half Native women without asking, made 1/3 of Puerto Ricans lab rats, and booted Inuit off their turf for Thule base. 😂
‘American citizens’? Dream on, genius. Greenland deserves better than that circus.
I understand the argument about trauma and poverty, but it doesn’t match what we see in Denmark or anywhere else in Europe.
Denmark has taken in large groups from Southeast Asia, the Balkans, and recently Ukraine. Many arrived from war, instability, and extremely difficult conditions. They faced disrupted schooling, trauma, language barriers, and poverty. Yet their crime rates are nowhere near the same as the groups being discussed.
If trauma and poverty alone explained everything, we would see the same pattern across all refugee groups, but we clearly don’t.
And this isn’t only a Danish issue. Somali immigrant demographics show almost identical crime and integration challenges across Europe, including Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, and the UK.
Meanwhile, groups from Southeast Asia and the Balkans show consistently strong integration outcomes with low crime rates across those same countries.
So the data shows very clearly that some demographic groups, regardless of host country, face persistent integration challenges, while others integrate successfully in almost every Western society.
This doesn’t mean blaming entire populations, but it does mean we need a more honest explanation than simply “trauma” or “poverty” when the same patterns repeat across multiple countries and systems.