Sperdermern

Spiderman, Spiderman, does whatever a spider can.

[Tanner Cartwright 🇺🇸 @TanneriteCortez]

“Most sexual crimes are committed by Whites”

No. There’s an agenda to mark foreigners as White for three reasons:

1. To make you hate your own people

2. To keep you from realizing how many invaders commit heinous crime.

3. To make you think there aren’t as many foreigners here as there obviously are.

[Hon. Vickie Paladino @VickieforNYC]

I've said this before and I'll say it again.

We are in a soft secession under Zohran. He considers New York an independent city-state with its own foreign policy, immigration policy, and economic policy. He does not recognize the authority of the federal government except to the extent he can extract money or political wins from it.

The intent is to use the resources and authority of New York City to wage war against the federal government and the rest of the country. The DSA is quite open about it. They're telling us what they plan to do, and Zohran is executing.

Colluding with the Iranians was just another means to that end. They will collude with any and all of our enemies, because the stated goal of the DSA is to dismantle the country from within. Again, they say all of this out loud. No inferences necessary here.

In this particular case, the meeting with the Iranians was sidelined by the State Department. But the intention is crystal clear, and just because a high-profile meeting was stopped doesn't mean there isn't back channel communication and cooperation happening between the DSA/Mamdani admin and the Iranians. Obviously there is. Meetings like this don't just materialize out of thin air, and ties between the DSA and Iranian-linked fronts like the People's Forum are too many to count.

Now what are we actually going to do about this?

We're WAY past the point that it can honestly be argued that the DSA isn't an insurgency determined to bring down the country. I really think it requires a military solution now; take this out of the corrupt civil court system and use the military to roll up the DSA and charge them as revolutionary insurgents. Do it while we still can and avoid inevitable future bloodshed.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

Police officer becomes a whistleblower and says that Flock Safety Cameras are not what were being told they are

He says they are not just capturing license plates, they are capturing everything and being used for mass surveillance without a warrant, “It records the make, the model, color, bumping stickers, you name it — it's a very sophisticated AI software that uses a camera system to track and monitor every vehicle that goes by the camera lens”

“This information is shared city to city and even state to state without a warrant”

“Your consent was never required nor even asked for or even thought about when your city governments was putting up this new technology.

For example, the chief of the Pateka Police Department, she was confronted by a local reporter on this very question of what gave them the right to put up these cameras without consulting the public. Her response was, so the criminals wouldn't know about it and avoid detection. So there you go. That's their best argument about”

He says he brought up concerns about privacy and transparency and in return he was suspended without pay

He says we are headed the same way as the soviets and China

He says this is what you’re told by authority, “If you are worrying about it, it's because you have something to hide.

The philosophy that this innovation is already grounded on is already proven to be rotten. It's grounded on this idea that you, the citizen, are first and foremost a potential suspect or potential defendant that needs to be tracked and monitored for your safety and for the safety of others. It's the same philosophy that the Soviets and many authoritarian states during the 20th century adopted, and we all know how that worked out for them. It's the same philosophy that the Chinese are currently adopting right now and they have a similar surveillance system”

Keep in mind I’ve also shared videos of the Flock camera called “Condor”

This goes beyond vehicles and actually tracks you as you walk by. The cameras follow you, can zoom in and automatically detect you in areas

This goes way beyond license plate reading. This is the mass surveillance network being established in America

We are right around the corner from a police state

[Department Of Deportations @DoDeportations]

We have hundreds and hundreds of these

[jay plemons @jayplemons]

Nick Shirley uncovers an adult day care in Flushing, Queens with 7,000 phantom members.

Nick: “This public document says you have 7,899 members.”

Employee: “No, we don’t have 7,000 members.”

Nick: “So you’re overbilling then? You’re getting paid $1,600 per patient — that’s how you got $12.9 million in 2024.”

Employee: “Please leave.”

American taxpayer dollars at work.

[VanRaalte, Agro-Nationalist @AgroNationalism]

>invaders steal from supermarkets
>Invaders use food stamps to buy more than they need
>Invaders sell stolen goods for cash to their coethnics

>Supermarkets have taxpayer subsidized insurance to cover shoplifting loss
>Supermarkets lobby government to expand food stamps

>Supermarkets employ invaders for poverty wages because they're able to offset cost of living via stealing and welfare

>Prices of products go up to cover theft
>Taxes go up to cover welfare

>Supermarkets profit
>Invaders profit

Americans pay the bill

[Gregory K Bovino @GregoryKBovino]

Politicians swear: “Sharia will never come to America.”

They apparently forgot “one man, one vote from their civics classes.”

After 9/11 New Yorkers fought a big mosque being built near Ground Zero. They succeeded temporarily…

Now, NYC has a Muslim mayor and Brooklyn gets amplified calls to prayer at 5 AM.

This isn’t assimilation.

It’s demographics.

Import enough people who want Sharia and you’ll get it, one election at a time.

Open borders aren’t compassion.

They’re civilizational replacement.

Stop immigration and start mass deportations before it’s too late.

[Young Americans for Liberty @YALiberty]

This is the danger of Flock cameras.

She was guilty until proven innocent... and she was only able to prove her innocence with her own video footage.

[Lone Star Legionaries @TexanLoyal]

American hospitals putting up billboards in other countries promoting anchor babies in #Texas.

[Aesthetica @Anc_Aesthetics]

Apparently people don't know this so let me explain how Mamdani and his band of genocidal communists won their elections.

Subcontinentals.

Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis to be specific.

The DSA provided the coordination but subcontinentals provided the votes. And the level to which these demographic groups are extremely far left is unprecedented in this country. Not even black women have this level of far left extremism.

The main group is called DRUM "Desis Rising Up and Moving" (yes they are corny and gay) and they used the extreme ethnic nepotism in these communities to get out the vote. Canvassers reported only having to mention that Mamdani was Indian, or Muslim or South Asian to capture their votes. The platform itself didn't matter, it was purely racial politics.

The data is even more insane. Mamdani won by 41 points in "Little Bangladesh", 49 points in "Little Bengal", and a whopping 75 points in Western Queens which is also dominated by Bangladeshi immigrants.

These massive differentials aren't over Republicans either. These gaps are over a Democrat. Do you know how far left you have to be as a community to vote 75 points in favor of a communist? MLK could have risen from the grave and they still would have elected Mamdani in these areas.

Mamdani also dominated South Asian enclaves in Jackson Heights, Sikh and Indo-Caribbean Ozone Park, Richmond Hill in the south and the Hillside Avenue corridor in the east with more Bangladeshis. We also saw an uptick of between 300-600% in voter turnout with these demographic groups.

No matter how you slice it the communist left have found their base. And that base has another 2 billion in the subcontinent just waiting for an opportunity to come here and elect more genocidal communists.

If we don't ban immigration from this entire region. The "Communist caucus" will skyrocket and our country will be in trouble.

[Paul @WomanDefiner]

I just want to remind everyone that migrants come with a lot of federal money and that's why states want them. 65% of Haitians are on welfare.

What Americans don't know is that the federal Government picks up the costs for TPS protected migrants and have been for 30 years.

[Doug Ponder @dougponder]

This is partly true, but it misconstrues the total witness of Scripture in ways that are particularly harmful in the present.

Here’s the true part: The Bible does not give strongly differentiated lists of virtues for men and women. The goal of every Christian, male or female, is Christlikeness (Rom. 8:29).

Yet though the goal is the same, the path to that goal differs according to our natures and our callings. The Scriptures speak to this as well.

Consider the following:

The Bible nowhere says, “Men are not permitted to lust, but women are,” but the Scriptures do speak of lust in ways that highlight a masculine orientation that needs to be checked and reformed by the Spirit.

For example, Jesus applies the general command “You shall not commit adultery” (Ex. 20:14; cf. Matt. 5:27) to men in a special manner, saying, “Everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matt. 5:28).

Jesus very easily could have said, “Everyone who looks at anyone with lustful intent has already committed adultery in the heart.” There is no grammatical reason why he must specify the (male) gender of the one who lusts nor why he casts the object of lust as a woman. Yet Jesus does so, and it only takes two eyes and a brain to know why.

Every person not living in denial of reality knows that men struggle, to a significantly greater degree, with sexual sins, including lust, the use of pornography, sexual abuse, and rape. In some of these cases, men commit these sins 2–3 times more commonly than women; in others they commit them at tenfold rates.

God knows our frame. (He made us, after all.) He knows that women are imbued with the power to attract men, as this was his design from the beginning: “For this reason, a man leaves his father and mother and holds fast to his wife…” (Gen. 2:24; cf. Matt. 19:5).

Again, the Lord could have said, “For this reason a man and a woman leave their fathers and mothers and hold fast to each other,” but he did not do so. Not only is the principle of male headship in view here, but also I think (following the work of Alastair Roberts and Stephen B. Clark) that the God-given order of things is in view here, too. Specifically, God designed women to be attractive to men, and he designed men to act on this attraction by pursuing them unto a godly marriage.

This stuff is so obvious that older generations understood it, embraced it, and even made jokes about it. But we’ve forgotten—or, it would be better to say, intentionally rejected—what was once obvious to everyone. And we’re worse off for it.

Another example: In 1 Timothy 2:8–10, God (through Paul) gives instructions to men and women regarding how they should conduct themselves in the household of God (1 Tim. 3:15).

Notice the asymmetry: Men are called to pray by lifting holy hands “without wrath or quarreling” (1 Tim. 2:8). Now, Paul is no dummy. He knows what crime statistics now confirm, namely, that the vast majority of violent crime is carried out by unbridled men. So Paul redirects male strength (cf. 1 John 2:14) and natural aggression toward godly ends and away from sinful, destructive ones.

Then Paul says, “Likewise, the women…” (1 Tim. 2:9), but he does not mention wrath and quarreling. One would expect him to do so, given his use of the word “likewise” but Paul has other plans. He writes, “Likewise, the women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, but with what is proper for women who profess godliness—with good works” (1 Tim. 2:9–10).

This fits with what I’ve already said about the power of women to attract the attention of others. And though Paul is not speaking about sexual modesty here (he is talking about ostentatious displays), the point about the power of attraction remains.

Only a fool would say, “So, then, women are free to be wrathful and men are free to dress immodestly!” Of course not. But also, it would be foolish to overlook the asymmetry the apostle builds into his instructions.

There is a reason why he focuses on wrath for men and attention-seeking for women. Anyone can sin in these ways, but men and women are prone (through a combination of God’s design and the spoiling effects of the fall) to sin in these ways to an especial degree.

So, are there different virtues for men and women? No, not strictly speaking. But the acquisition of these virtues takes on special significance in the lives of men and women who are inclined to violate them in particular ways.

There is more to say, however. Church history is replete with examples of how the virtues are expressed differently in men and women.

Take courage, for example. If a man were to act cowardly in the face of a threat to his family, he would be guilty of failing to exhibit courage and failing to fulfill his duty as a man, who is charged to “guard/watch over” what is entrusted to him (Gen. 2:15), even laying down his life when necessary (Eph. 5:25).

However, women are not explicitly called by God to protect their husbands in the same way (because they have a different nature and role or calling). If, therefore, a woman were to act cowardly in the face of a threat to her family, we might say that he was guilty of failing to exhibit courage, but we would not (or, rather, we should not) say that she was acting unwomanly.

This is why the prophet Nahum rebuked the people of Nineveh, saying that the troops (which were all male) “are like women in your midst” (Nah. 3:13). You have two options here: either (1) God, via Nahum, is a sexist who mocks women, or (2) there is something different about men and women in God’s design that makes such a remark fitting and appropriate in certain contexts.

As for me and my house, we’ll choose the latter of those options. That is to say, there is something about the way God made men, and what he has called them to be and do, that requires a different expression of courage that is not demanded of women in all times and places. (The same goes for women and other expressions of particular virtues.)

An example: When Jael drives the tent peg through Sisera’s skull, she was going above and beyond the call of duty (Judg. 4:21). Yet even here, as many scholars have pointed out, there is a gendered element to the story. Jael did not conquer Sisera on the battlefield but in a homely tent (Judg. 4:18), after giving the man some milk (Judg. 4:19). Sisera even asks, “Is there a man here?” (Judg. 4:20), for he knew the usual source of danger to a soldier. And it’s only in that context, when “he was lying fast asleep from weariness” (Judg. 4:22) that Jael did her glorious deed.

Excursus: While we’re in Judges, it has always struck me funny that people think Deborah stands as some kind of symbol for egalitarian strengths or giftedness. For when she and Barak sing their song of victory, Deborah says of herself, “I, Deborah, arose as a mother in Israel” (Judg. 5:7). And later the author of Hebrews 11 mentions Barak (Heb. 11:32) but not Deborah in his famous “hall of faith.” That’s worth puzzling over, if you’re someone who is inclined to see her story as a kind of proof text that strikes against the principle of male headship.

Anyway, back to the main point: Men and women are both called to Christlikeness, yes and amen. But because we are men and women, the path to Christlikeness is paved with different duties (callings) and even different expressions of shared virtues. Borrowing an illustration from Alastair Roberts, it is best to say that when it comes to virtue, men and women are called to play the same notes, but they play them with different timbres, according to their differing natures in God’s design.

This is, by the way, exactly why Paul says, “But we were gentle among you, like a nursing mother taking care of her own children" (1 Thessalonians 2:7). He does not say, “But we were gentle among you, like a [nursing] father taking care of his own children.” Paul knows that while both men and women are called to be gentle in many places in Scripture, there is an expression of gentleness among mothers that made his metaphor so striking.

Those who understand all this will see no threat to women (or men) in any of this. Rather, they will see the beauty of God's design, which shapes the course we take on the road toward the same goal, which is conformity to the image of Christ.

[Greg Price @greg_price11]

Mamdani-endorsed Aber Kwas won the Democrat Primary tonight for a State Senate seat in New York.

Here she is saying that 9-11 was America's fault because of our "system of capitalism, racism, white supremacy and islamophobia."

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

Have you ever heard that saying "Left wing discourse is pretending they don't know something they know, thus making discourse impossible"?

1) The right cares about HUMAN RIGHTS. The left calls some things "human rights" that aren't Human rights. Then feigns confusion as to why the right doesn't support "human rights" forgetting (or gaslighting) themselves (and everyone else) into thinking the right doesn't support Human rights. The right supports more Human rights than the left does - they're borderline militant in protecting freedom of speech and gun rights, both of which the left opposes. Human rights does not include "to use the bathroom or joint he sports team of your identity", as that isn't a right afforded to anyone, and isn't a Human right. The left invents things and calls them "human rights" when they aren't. Protip: You just calling a thing a name does not make that thing that name.

2) Toxic/suicidal empathy is a trap. It's not a superpower. It has the power to paralyze people and to manipulate people. It's a weakness on par with kryptonite. A well balanced person has empathy, but are not ruled/dominated by it. They don't drop everything when someone screams "Won't SOMEone THINK of the CHILdren!!!?!". It is balanced by a rational mind and critical thinking providing analysis of situations, as well as will and resolve. The "empathy trap" is to use someone's empathy to trick them.

You already know this, though. So see the top paragraph where you're just pretending you don't, thus making discourse impossible.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Correct

[Sperdermern @SperderWeb]

@Brian_Sauve

[Sam Costner @samuel_costner]

Some of you knuckleheads need to understand something.

Most of you know by now that this is not the unfortunate side effect of lax immigration policy—it's an engineered destruction of the least governable people on earth (historically): westerners, the fading heirs of Christendom.

Western whites are not easily conquered in the same way we ourselves once conquered: head-on. Subversion is far more effective, as we've seen.

A gazillion Hollywood productions, combined with continual messaging from the intelligentsia over decades, built upon and focused a previous 20th-century adversary into a cartoonish embodiment of all evil.

That is to say, the caricature of "Nazi" was seized upon precisely so that you and all your friends would not step forward and stop the utter horror that has befallen our British brethren. It obviously worked brilliantly in the UK, and it is going over just as well in a number of other nations.

Has it worked in America? Yes.

By the grace of God, the numbers of invaders are not entirely insurmountable. And though the courage and the stomach to undo what's been done is stirring again, it is being pulled down by the men who rightly received their programming.

It is a sad and sick irony that the trace amounts of genuine interest in 19th-20th century social-Darwinian ethnic cleansing—which arise now in response to genuine atrocities and cultural genocide such as the horrors of the UK Muslim rape gangs—are targeted over and above the rushing wall of death that now sweeps the world.

They called you "Nazis" so that you would be afraid to stand up and stop these horrors. They never dreamed that you would busy yourself fighting your "Nazi" brothers while unthinkable atrocities approached your own children.

With every day that passes, the needed response to fight the evil of Mordor grows, so that the accusation of "Nazi"—ironically, to the programmed mind—becomes more credible, and you become all the less likely to do what Proverbs 24:11 requires of you: "Rescue those who are being taken away to death."

May God have mercy on us, and grant us one last explosive spark of courage.

[Sperdermern @SperderWeb]

@bendellwerry Congratulations! Praise be to God!

[Sperdermern @SperderWeb]

@benjaminvernon_ @Brian_Sauve @The_Kings_Hall Very similar story to my own. I've gained so much by implementing advice from Ogden podcasts. I can't believe the amount of flack they get.

Heavily avow.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

The Rape Gang Inquiry Report.

https://t.co/EuKgGWBRhS