UnknownOne

Trying to be silent in a world of lies...how long can I?
USNavy vet, Texan. it's getting harder to escape politics.
"This world is worth saving" "No giving up!"

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

Hm, I need to make a pin to link pins. XD

That is, make a pin then just add to the chain things I think are good...

[RemoWilliams ⚓️🇺🇸 @DOJFBIisbroken]

@LauraLoomer @marie_doonan @NIH Why are foreign nationals working in National Security positions?

[Laura Loomer @LauraLoomer]

🚨 BREAKING: 🚨

Dr. Vincent Munster, a foreign born national virologist who works at the Rocky Mountain Laboratory under @NIH and Claude Kwe, one of his foreign born colleagues from Cameroon who also works at NIH in the same lab have officially been charged with smuggling monkeypox and other deadly pathogens (possibly Ebola) into the United States from the Democratic Republic of Congo and lying about it when confronted by Border Patrol!!!

@WhiteCoatWaste and I are totally vindicated after we broke this story several weeks ago about how NIH was covering up the fact that several foreign born virologists working at NIH under the Trump admin at Rocky Mountain Laboratory, a Biosafety Level 4 laboratory, snuck lethal pathogens into the US. They work at the same lab where an Ebola infected monkey bit an NIH researcher, and this was also covered up by @DrJBhattacharya and NIH.

According to the press release,

“On January 25, 2026, Munster and Kwe arrived at the McNamara Terminal at Detroit Metropolitan Airport with travel originating from Brazzaville, Republic of Congo, where an outbreak of monkeypox was occurring. Monkeypox is an infectious virus that can result in painful rash, enlarged lymph nodes, fevers and other ailments.

Munster and Kwe were inspected and interviewed by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials upon their arrival. CBP officers observed Kwe and Munster traveling with a large black plastic case. Munster and Kwe falsely told CBP officers that the black case contained diagnostics and testing equipment. But subsequent investigation by CBP and FBI agents revealed that the case actually contained 113 vials in Styrofoam coolers. As of the date of the complaint, the FBI has tested 20 of the 113 vials. Seventeen of them contained deactivated monkeypox virus, one contained the Chickenpox virus, and two contained only human DNA. 

“These NIH experts apparently broke our laws by smuggling viral pathogens on a packed commercial airplane from an outbreak in the Republic of Congo. Let that sink in,” United States Attorney Gorgon stated.

“No researchers should believe their positions, credentials, or professional status place them above the law,” said Jennifer Runyan, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Detroit Field Office. “The allegations in this case are serious. They involve the dangerous and unlawful smuggling of deactivated Mpox virus into the United States and alleged efforts to mislead our federal agents.”

The FBI admits only 20 of the 113 vials have been tested, which means we could soon learn that other lethal pathogens from Africa were illegally smuggled into our country by foreign born virologists who are Dr. Fauci acolytes.

Additionally, as I have previously reported, Munster’s wifeEmmie de Wit still works at NIH in the same laboratory where she studies Ebola. She should not be allowed to continue working at NIH, as White Coat Waste and I exposed she was also allegedly traveling with her husband and his colleague when they were caught at the airport in Michigan smuggling viruses into the United States from an outbreak zone in the Congo.

Munster and Kwe face a maximum sentence of five years in prison. 

The investigation is being conducted by the Detroit Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Detroit and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). 

@TimSheehyMT @JustinRGoodman @SenRickScott

Read the full press release here:

https://t.co/jmJpEBFkIr

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 JUST IN: Marco Rubio TOYS with insufferable Rep. Jacobs (D) 🤣

JACOBS: Who won 2020?

RUBIO: I'm not answering about 2020, this is a FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

JACOBS: You can't admit the shoes Trump bought you are too big

RUBIO: The Florsheims he gave me fit fine 🤣

JACOBS: Your shoes look nice, Mr. Secretary

RUBIO: How can you see them? They're way down here. We're talking about SHOES, are you KIDDING ME?! I mean, is this the Foreign Affairs Committee or a CIRCUS?! What IS this?! 🔥

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

It hasn't.

Two different legal issues, as I'm sure you know. You're lying.

Yes yes, his rabid followers:

Virginia Democrats violated their state Constitution. Their Supreme Court (correctly) ruled so. I can go into the details if you want to know, but let's be honesty, you don't. You want power and a narrative based in ignorance, not information and factual knowledge. This was a state issue, not a federal issue - Democrats THEMSELVES insisted this when they thought SCOVa was going to rule in their favor and didn't want Republicans to be able to appeal it. SCOTUS agreed with Democrats that it was not their jurisdiction to decide. SCOTUS didn't strike down Virginia's map, SCOVa did. A court, I might add, where the majority of the Justices were DEMOCRAT appointees/leaners.

Alabama, on the other hand, made this map before, at the census redistricting. It was ruled AGAINST by courts due to the (faulty) interpretation of the VRA. Since that interpretation is no longer valid, the original map by all rights should be implemented. This is a federal issue, since the VRA was and is a federal issue, and since a SCOTUS ruling has changed that law's application, allowing the 2020 Alabama map to be implemented.

You all know this - or should - you just don't care.

You want to be outraged and give yourselves moral license to stack the Supreme Court. This is all about power to all of you, you're just looking for a moral excuse to nakedly seek and exercise power, and you don't care that the moral excuse you came up with is invalid.

We all know this, so it's time you all stop pretending.

You talk a big game about minority rights, democracy, and crooked courts (but don't admit the DC Circuit is the absolute worst since it's hard left leaning activist justices there), but you don't care about any of that.

What you want is to win, get your way, and impose your rules/laws on the rest of society with the courts approving it instead of blocking it. You want to be able to pass laws or Constitutional Amendments without actually having majority support or going through the issue of passing it into law, dealing witht he filibuster, compromising with the opposition, giving validation to the opposition's view, and want to run roughshod over everyone who disagrees and does not want your policies to govern their lives.

You want them to have no escape.

You want to oppress them, and you insist it's "for their own good" and/or that they're bad people who deserve to be oppressed.

It's time for you on the left to stop lying and infalting your egos.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

The West has created an utterly evil state religion where an accusation of “racism” is the gravest offense that can be committed, even worse than rape or murder!

So if police show up at a crime scene and a British boy is bleeding out and an immigrant says the British boy is racist the cops will cuff the dying British boy.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

I think here's the problem with your retort:

They didn't speak against it.

They were content to welcome the TQ+ into their circle for more political and social power. They only got worried when it looked like it might cost them clout and acceptance. And even then, they didn't speak against it, they just stopped speaking for it, which means they were still in favor of it, or at least didn't want to alienate it, so they wouldn't come out against it.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@Ianmoss1992 @SpeakingBee @neoagrarian @Mankosmash @cremieuxrecueil So do the rest of us. We want them to get whatever help they need with their body dysmorphia issues, just as people with other body dysmorphia issues (like anorexia or muscle/body image) need help in overcoming and trying to move passed those difficulties.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@SpeakingBee @neoagrarian @Mankosmash @cremieuxrecueil Yeah. Not speaking in favor isn't the same as speaking against.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@mild_opinions @Mankosmash @cremieuxrecueil Anorexia is also. And...?

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@cremieuxrecueil Yeah...that activism going out of control, pushing into regular society, schools, etc.

Most Americans don't care what you do if it's in private. They start caring when it's forced on them and their children.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@Glinner Yeah, that TQ+ going out of control, pushing into regular society, schools, etc.

Most Americans don't care what you do if it's in private. They start caring when it's forced on them and their children.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@CarrollDoherty @Gallup Not really. It's been this way since 2022 (or 2023?), and these match historical levels (2014 and earlier, the pre-Trump era, if you will).

Independent support has also dropped back to roughly its 2014 level.

Democrats are the outliers here.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@peterbakernyt @Gallup @ajlotz8 "Republican support has returned to pre-Trump levels. Independent support has also largely returned to pre-Trump levels."

That is, 2014 and earlier.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@Gallup They were still in the Great Recession in 2011, weren't they? That seems an odd starting point unless you're trying to make a statistic with a big positive jump for some reason...?

[Matt USA#1 @pwzh2bhg6d]

@burkem100 @FoxNews @DNC We are tired of this ideology being forced on us daily. Why not have a month for veterans or first responders that have given their lives so others may live?

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@ikerock @Phil_Lewis_ So like Democrats with everything from Title IX to the 2A?

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@Stennett4Senate @Phil_Lewis_ Stop it.

Just accept you lose sometimes when the law isn't on your side:

https://t.co/zrlAOYZfTD

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

Virginia's amendment wasn't legal since it violated the Constitution's process for amendments.

Virginia COULD use that new map if they had obeyed their Constitution.

Alabama is not violating its Constitution for their new map.

That is how the two are different.

Virginia's problem is due to Democrats. Democrats pushed an amendment into the state Constitution in 2020 barring what they are trying to do now. It passed with huge bipartisan support, not a narrow as possible 51%. The governor (now) even voted for that bill then, and when she ran for her current position, said she would not support repealing it.

Because they did that, to change it would require obeying the Constitution and having a legal amendment to repeal the fair commissions amendment from 2020. That requires voting for the amendment once, having an election with the amendment posted for voters to see it for at least 90 days, and then after that election (where voters who opposed the amendment could vote out of office the people that passed it if they wanted to prevent it), having the amendment language pass the Legislature AGAIN, and only after that, going to the voters.

The 2025 election was in progress (just 4 days away and over a million votes had been cast already), and there was no 90 days before the vote started on the amendment (early voting started before that window ended, as they scheduled the public vote too early, basically).

That is why VIRGINIA'S Supreme Court, a majority were appointed by DEMOCRATS in the state, mind you, ruled 4-3 that it was Unconstitutional.

Before that ruling, when Democrats thought they would win it, they argued the US Supreme Court had no say as it was a state matter. Only after the ruling against them did Democrats change their tune and appeal to SCOTUS, knowing it would be denied (they had literally argued before that is should be denied if they won and Republicans appealed), so they could mislead their ignorant base that the SCOTUS was siding with Republicans somehow.

So stop being ignorant and falling for it.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@Catlover1192 @Phil_Lewis_ No, legal. Different legal issues:

https://t.co/zrlAOYZfTD

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

Virginia's amendment wasn't legal since it violated the Constitution's process for amendments.

Virginia COULD use that new map if they had obeyed their Constitution.

Alabama is not violating its Constitution for their new map.

That is how the two are different.

Virginia's problem is due to Democrats. Democrats pushed an amendment into the state Constitution in 2020 barring what they are trying to do now. It passed with huge bipartisan support, not a narrow as possible 51%. The governor (now) even voted for that bill then, and when she ran for her current position, said she would not support repealing it.

Because they did that, to change it would require obeying the Constitution and having a legal amendment to repeal the fair commissions amendment from 2020. That requires voting for the amendment once, having an election with the amendment posted for voters to see it for at least 90 days, and then after that election (where voters who opposed the amendment could vote out of office the people that passed it if they wanted to prevent it), having the amendment language pass the Legislature AGAIN, and only after that, going to the voters.

The 2025 election was in progress (just 4 days away and over a million votes had been cast already), and there was no 90 days before the vote started on the amendment (early voting started before that window ended, as they scheduled the public vote too early, basically).

That is why VIRGINIA'S Supreme Court, a majority were appointed by DEMOCRATS in the state, mind you, ruled 4-3 that it was Unconstitutional.

Before that ruling, when Democrats thought they would win it, they argued the US Supreme Court had no say as it was a state matter. Only after the ruling against them did Democrats change their tune and appeal to SCOTUS, knowing it would be denied (they had literally argued before that is should be denied if they won and Republicans appealed), so they could mislead their ignorant base that the SCOTUS was siding with Republicans somehow.

So stop being ignorant and falling for it.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@Noonefromnowhar @KevinaFaga @Phil_Lewis_ @grok No, they didn't:

https://t.co/zrlAOYZfTD

Different legal issues mean different rulings.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

Virginia's amendment wasn't legal since it violated the Constitution's process for amendments.

Virginia COULD use that new map if they had obeyed their Constitution.

Alabama is not violating its Constitution for their new map.

That is how the two are different.

Virginia's problem is due to Democrats. Democrats pushed an amendment into the state Constitution in 2020 barring what they are trying to do now. It passed with huge bipartisan support, not a narrow as possible 51%. The governor (now) even voted for that bill then, and when she ran for her current position, said she would not support repealing it.

Because they did that, to change it would require obeying the Constitution and having a legal amendment to repeal the fair commissions amendment from 2020. That requires voting for the amendment once, having an election with the amendment posted for voters to see it for at least 90 days, and then after that election (where voters who opposed the amendment could vote out of office the people that passed it if they wanted to prevent it), having the amendment language pass the Legislature AGAIN, and only after that, going to the voters.

The 2025 election was in progress (just 4 days away and over a million votes had been cast already), and there was no 90 days before the vote started on the amendment (early voting started before that window ended, as they scheduled the public vote too early, basically).

That is why VIRGINIA'S Supreme Court, a majority were appointed by DEMOCRATS in the state, mind you, ruled 4-3 that it was Unconstitutional.

Before that ruling, when Democrats thought they would win it, they argued the US Supreme Court had no say as it was a state matter. Only after the ruling against them did Democrats change their tune and appeal to SCOTUS, knowing it would be denied (they had literally argued before that is should be denied if they won and Republicans appealed), so they could mislead their ignorant base that the SCOTUS was siding with Republicans somehow.

So stop being ignorant and falling for it.

[UnknownOne @SubduedRadical]

@L82twatmytweet @Phil_Lewis_ No, you folks are just insane.