@waelnassaf Actually, marketing has also never been easier. It's just that most AI slop out there starts with "oh I can do this, this is cool" instead of solving real problems
The reason most early-stage GTM plans go wrong is founders starting with the product in mind.
You start with the customer in mind.
Build a profitable product / solution after a 20min search on a subreddit >>> spend 6 months building with no validation.
Honestly, it's a skill issue.
The real problem is that the idea of a workforce has shifted since covid. People figured out their income could increase by 30-50% so long as they hopped jobs every year, and they did.
Either match wage growth or offer more competitive salaries/benefits if you want to increase tenure.
most ppl underestimate how chaotic early stage startups actually are.
from personnel turnover & shifting commitments to the fact that everyone now operates with the same fomo/optionality glut you see in dating markets (dating markets are most visible form of this but this is happening everywhere). when ppl have infinite options commitment gets expensive in their mind & the evaluation period never closes.. every day is a reeval against the shadow portfolio of everything they didn’t pick.
so the job of a founder is often managing the continuous rerecruitment of your own team against a moving outside option. that emotional & narrative layer is as much if not more than anything you ship.
@GJarrosson The fact that any 30-year-old can think their expertise is not worth investing in because of their age is mental.
Every day, there are expensive launch videos, but 70% of those startups don't last a year. Being a young founder doesn't mean being a successful one
@creatine_cycle The thing about SF I'm hearing is that the energy is so contagious, 996 sounds sustainable
Talked with too many people moving there, and I'm honestly considering it
@harjtaggar This is where hiring a CEO can come in handy. No matter how disciplined you may be, you will always sabotage what you don't want to pursue
human nature
There are two different magnitudes for AI, and almost nobody talks about the second.
The first is value magnitude, or how much impact value AI is creating for companies that use it.
Second is reach, or how many companies worldwide are using AI. 73% of the AI investing has gone in the Bay Area so far.
There's still a plethora of companies running on spreadsheets and manual workflows.
We're so so so early.
it's insane to me how most people outside of the tech bubble still have no idea what is about to happen to the economy, and the magnitude of the AI/physical AI wave.
once you see it, you can't unsee it. I'm just grateful to have a front row seat!
@drewhahn especially in AI. There are too many use cases to AI to draw out the best one
if you see an industry crave it, go for it and become the best for AI + [insert industry]
@PrimalNick There was a study where birth rates significantly decreased after the new iPhone (and consequent competitors) launched in 2007.
Prob the answer for you would be to just uninstall or block social media, but it won't address this societal gap