@itiswyatt@SahilBloom@OnRallyRd My main curiosity is if, in the future, this remains based on sports cards (or other physical assets) or if it turns into an exchange based on interest in players without it being based on a physical asset (i.e. shares in a Trout Index rather than shares in a Trout rookie)
@itiswyatt@OnRallyRd@SahilBloom Great point (& I think your content is helping a lot with filling that hole). Curious to see how trust is built, especially given target customers will likely go from retail 1st, then institutional, rather than vice versa, which is how many researchers went for traditional assets
@michaelsidgmore@itiswyatt@JoePompliano That S / D dynamic is definitely key, and where the fractional space can have an interesting impact - natural scarcity of X player’s rookie card drives up price, while also allowing more people to get in as fractional owners. That increased participation is good for the hobby IMO
@rookieholic@itiswyatt@michaelsidgmore@JoePompliano I honestly don’t know enough to comment - I have seen the sales pop up on my feed but haven’t done the research yet to know enough about what’s going on and how they’re transactable
@itiswyatt@michaelsidgmore@JoePompliano I think that’s totally fair (and what I hope happens as a way to help people diversify). I think it will be fascinating to see a year from now how much this boom in cards triggers crossover interest into art, etc that have similar characteristics - hoping you’re right!
@itiswyatt@michaelsidgmore@JoePompliano Totally agree the level of access & ancillary services make it A TON easier for more people to get involved, which is great - I just am curious if people are going to behaviorally maintain faith in the asset class when it doesn’t just go straight up, as it has over the last year
@DCLBlogger What do you mean Alts down 90%? VC/PE/HFs are the alts with the most $ behind them by far and none of them were even in the remote ballpark of being down 90%
I’m a little tired of people saying “I can’t believe a piece of cardboard is worth $5.2m” in reaction to the ‘52 Mantle sale. That’s like saying a piece of art is “a piece of canvas worth $x million”... It actively belittles the value when you know it’s worth more than that
@MTTrading2 Yeah totally agree - the biggest narrative to me by far is that removing the top cards in the hobby takes returns below the opportunity cost
@MTTrading2 Ah interesting - definitely a good trend for cards over the last 3 months but the success is still being carried by the cards at the top of the industry, so the trend seems similar
Talked about the @PWCCmarketplace Index @JoePompliano cited in this chain in the most recent SCAA newsletter below - some vintage cards can be great investments, but not all of them are a guaranteed success as some suggest
https://t.co/Vgh8DRipUy