Winston

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@1776Soldier2024 @originl_threadz @FormanLaw1 Read it again. He is directly referencing precedent in a prior appellate ruling. He is applying the SAME LOGIC as an appellate Judge did. The blue is from the appellate ruling.

This is how rulings work. SC write out their reasoning & application, lawyers then use it.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@Lillyin_London @FormanLaw1 He is applying the same logic and reason as an appellate judge. It’s not the stretch you think it is.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@Lillyin_London @FormanLaw1 He is directly referencing precedent from a
CW appellate ruling. He is applying it to THIS trial

“Under CW v. Swafford 441 Mass 329 (2004) a juror's refusal to follow the law is always personal, andnot a matter of protected deliberative privilege, and requires removal”

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@Trinity_1776 @SecretaryBurgum @LanierTrader Actually you would. If your gas, food, housing, health prices are going up and the feds are tripling the national debt on a war no one wants and ego cosmetic projects… you would complain about another vanity project.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@BoltCarriers @Crackerthe4th @SecretaryBurgum When he’s literally on page 400 of the Nazi playbook… when it quacks like a duck, looks like a ducks, acts like a duck, it’s a ducking shit show.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@springsky @PatrioticDom @SecretaryBurgum It started on his first campaign. Took a long time for most to see it, and now that he’s literally doing the exact same shit (declaring legal people now illegal anyone?) .. some still deny it. Can’t fix stupid that’s worn like it’s flex.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@zeltonking @FT You can’t just drill a well anywhere. And if they are paying for water services, that system SHOULD be reliable. But there no legal consequences to these companies when they cheapskate UNTIL something like this happens.. and often not even then.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@0xVeepul @FT …… because they are low on rain this year and their water table is in dire straits. This was predictable, not unexpected, it was just a matter of when. Companies are going to under-invest when it’s profitable for them and the govt doesn’t enforce anything.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@Jamkle88 @Isucceed @FT Do you not understand for profit companies. .. like at all? It’s padding their bottom line. If it’s more profitable to ignore laws and safety rules, they are going to do it.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@ZetterRafe @FT So you mean for-profit companies took advantage of a govt that wouldn’t enforce the laws….? For profit companies are, by default, going to do whatever they can to pad their bottom line.

Sounds like a problem with privatization AND lack of govt oversight.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@scrwutoo @showtime4you @FT It also literally killed civilizations when their water disappeared. Relocation, famine, war over resources. This person has even less clue, and that’s including ancient cultures that HAD running water and aqua-ducts (some even had plumbing and sewer systems.)

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@showtime4you @FT …… yeah when they had droughts, their civilization failed. By relocating, mass death from famine and war. Thousand years long civilizations disappeared from water table, flow changes, and long droughts.. even with ancient pipework and aquaducts

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@baamaaaa @CaseyTaylor520 @RepNancyMace Ah right, so because 0.3% of schizophrenics will commit a homicide that means they all lose their children then. You wanna talk about prevention.. what about all the free pedos we got walking around in office, school & police departments,? Maybe we shouldn’t let men have children

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@Bo3oF_45 @CaseyTaylor520 @RepNancyMace It’s disgusting that you think most mentally ill people will commit violence. Only 0.3% of schizophrenics will commit homicide. You’re going to punish 99.7% because of that?

What about the risk of men to children? It’s damn high there too as it’s men that kill most.

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@Bo3oF_45 @CaseyTaylor520 @RepNancyMace In something like schizophrenia, which is classified as a psychotic disorder. Violence occurs in 0.3% of cases. That means 99.7% of the time it’s perfectly fine. So you’re going to punish 99.7%??

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@CaseyTaylor520 @Samurai_Ando @RepNancyMace … thousands of people have raised kids just fine with schizophrenia. Violence occurs in 0.3% of people. You’re going to punish 99.7% of schizophrenics over that?

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@CaseyTaylor520 @RepNancyMace There’s a dozen psych conditions that can result in psychosis. There’s dozens of meds that can trigger it. Here’s a selection of health conditions that can trigger psychosis..

lack of sleep can cause psychosis ffs. No one can be a parent then

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@RepNancyMace That doesn’t leave a lot of kids at homes. There’s a helluva lot of drugs and medical conditions that can cause it. You gonna put more money into the foster system? How are you going to get enough foster parents?

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@RepNancyMace So everyone who has depression, bipolar, schizophrenics others that can have psychosis should have kids taken away too? What about the dozens of drugs that can trigger psychosis ? What about the several dozen health conditions that can trigger psychosis?

[Winston @SrWinstonSqueak]

@TheSystemSlayer @RepNancyMace Shit like this is exactly why LC did not divulge the details of her intrusive thoughts (though I doubt Tufts to get more details). She knows medical professionals are mandated reporters. It’s a legitimate fear.