Gigi

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@TheCarolErskine Yes everything is well! He's now 25 and he doing fantastic! ❤️

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

She was the best judge I’ve ever seen. I’m so grateful for her diligence and for holding the hospital and the system accountable during my nephew’s case. She showed great care and compassion for his needs. Because of her he received the care he needed she is truly amazing.

[Carol Erskine @TheCarolErskine]

Throughout my years on the bench, if I received unsolicited information about a pending case from a parent, grandparent, inmate, friend of a party, or anyone else connected to the litigation, my staff would return the communication without my reviewing it. The reason was simple: ex parte is ex parte. If information is important enough for a judge to consider, it should be presented through the proper court process where all parties have notice and an opportunity to respond. The integrity of the judicial process depends not only on fairness, but on the appearance of fairness.

[Lara @TheChauffeurX]

Adam Deitch discusses the Karen Read case, why the jury got it right, the parallels between the Birchmore and Read cases, the need for federal intervention, and his hope to talk with the O’Keefe’s.

@KristinaRex & @adamdeitch

📺 https://t.co/w9RxkjLn4o

[Adam Scott @chefcascottccc]

Many AFRK are pointing to the 1-2 second mark wjer there are 3 distinct red spots claiming this shows a busted light then the brake lights came on lighting up brightly.

That's not how LED Lights work. A diffuser is required to transmit the light throughout the housing. An "island" of light unconnected isn't possible. Nor is there a seperate diffuser for the brakes - it's jus a more intense light.

Here is a frame that isn't as "smooth" as the others showing the 3 seperate light sources seem to actually be an artifact left during the process of adding light sources. This is completely wiped out by the full lighting when brakes are applied - there is no "brake light" in this style tail light. It's simply a more intense light of the same diffuser.

[El Jafel @Will428304]

Remember when this footage didn’t exist?
That one time when Karen Read’s expert flew to Boston and Coleen Crawford stone walled him and said this footage was gone due to the recording being automatically deleted every thirty days? Lol.. Amazing.

[Aidan Kearney @DoctorTurtleboy]

Adam Deitch has been emailing back and forth with Paul Okeefe and wants to meet with him. That is a very positive sign, and the last thing in the world the McAlberts wanna hear. Just listen to this. He is convinced Karen Read is innocent, which means he drew the only conclusion an intelligent person could draw at that point. We all know who did it.

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@BakerBroken She’s become irrelevant, and most people who value substance have already tuned out. Her show feels more like noise than insight at this point. I know I’ve moved on! I stopped watching and unsubscribed.

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@TheCarolErskine @defense_diaries @GrantSmithEllis Thank you once again for being the voice of knowledge and reason! Your willingness to speak up on this case is appreciated. The judge in the case has now has drawn greater public/social media attention to it, even more eyes will be watching!

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@FormanLaw1 That happened after the June 8th tweet the judge was referencing. TB tweet was much latter in the month of June on the the twenty something not the 8th.

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

Great question @DropMicrodots !

[Microdots @DropMicrodots]

Where was the curiosity to find the leaker who leaked to Brian Albert and Higgins that a preservation order was coming for their phones?

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

These shenanigans from the Mcalberts and MSP and Canton Police should NOT be tolerated!!

[Grant Smith Ellis @GrantSmithEllis]

NEW 🚨🚨:

Karen Read has filed the following document in response to Judge Gildea's request for more information about which witnesses in the John O'Keefe civil trial have been avoiding their depositions.

Karen states as follows:

"In response to the Court’s request, Dkt. 135 (the “Request”), Defendant Karen Read (“Read”) provides clarification as to two statements contained in her argument against Brian Tully’s (“Tully”) Motion to Quash, which are presented below along with additional portions of each that clarify Read’s meaning and were not included in the Request:

1. “Apparently, buoyed by the treatment that other subpoenaed witnesses are getting by resisting their depositions, subpoenaed witness Brian Tully now seeks to stand in the same line by filing a motion seeking to quash his deposition.” (Emphasis added.)

2. “Rather, it appears, that Tully simply watched the manner in which other subpoenaed parties have been handled in this case.” (Emphasis added.)

These two arguments refer to the fact that multiple third parties Read has subpoenaed have either ignored such subpoenas’ (and therefor the Court’s) commands or sought to evade them, which will likely leave her forced to conduct a dozen or more depositions during the final month of discovery in this case.

1. On May 20, 2026, Colin Albert informed Read that he would be indefinitely unavailable for deposition after June 2, 2026 and continued to refuse to produce nearly all documents Read sought.

2. On May 20, 2026, Tully, through his counsel, agreed to July 8th for Tully’s deposition (which was moved at his counsel’s request).

3. On June 1, 2026, Brian Albert served objections to producing documents well after the deadline to object had passed and, the next day, claimed to be unavailable for multiple weeks that followed his subpoenaed date.

4. On June 1, 2026, Nicole Albert served objections to producing documents well after the deadline to object had passed and, the next day, claimed to be unavailable for multiple weeks that followed her subpoenaed date.

5. On June 1, 2026, Jennifer McCabe served objections to producing documents well after the deadline to object had passed and, the next day, claimed to be unavailable for multiple weeks that followed her subpoenaed date.

6. On June 1, 2026, Matthew McCabe served objections to producing documents well after the deadline to object had passed and, the next day, claimed to be unavailable for

7. On June 1, 2026, Allie McCabe served objections to producing documents well after the deadline to object had passed and, the next day, stated that she was unavailable for her chosen deposition date. However, she later agreed to appear on such date with only two days’ notice, and then testified that, in fact, she never had concrete plans (i.e. reservations, traveling companions, etc.) requiring her to be away on the date of her deposition.

8. On June 5, 2026, third party witness Michael Proctor filed his emergency motion for protective order seeking to continue his deposition scheduled for the next business day, despite having been properly subpoenaed in April 2026.

9. On June 16, 2026, Julie Albert failed to appear for her properly subpoenaed and noticed deposition.

10. On June 18, 2026, third party witness Tully suddenly served his motion to quash after his counsel had previously accepted service of the subpoena on his behalf and requested that Read reschedule it, which she did.

11. At no point before June 18, 2026 did Tully object to the subpoena’s request for responsive documents.

Read the full document here: https://t.co/7m1yKauggs

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@realjustsully @factsdontlie10 @DoctorTurtleboy 😮

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@DropMicrodots They need to take that pention back!!

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

Who has released the Proctor materials that were impounded? It must have been someone on the other side that wants to get Karen and TB in trouble!
#officerJohnOkeefe #KarenRead #AidanKearney

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@realjustsully Say his name Officer John O’Keefe 💙

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@LatimaMama @realjustsully They fooled you ! There is zero proof that Chloe is alive!

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@realjustsully FKR and FTB have your back we are watching 👀 and we all want justice for John O’Keefe. Stay strong keep speaking the truth 💗💚

[Sullivan James @realjustsully]

Karen Read LOOSENED the machinery around me so I could SPEAK.

GOD kept me quiet so I could LOOK and LISTEN ✝️

I will help her DISMANTLE the machine so it can never operate again and we will get JUSTICE for John O’Keefe.

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@realjustsully We are proud of you, James @realjustsully. Keep talking, don't let them silence you! I always wondered why they didn't call you in. You had direct contact with both John and Karen. But they had a long line of irrelevant and unnecessary “witnesses”! The truth is being revealed ☀️

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

This 😳😮

[Aidan Kearney @DoctorTurtleboy]

This man, James Sullivan, was at CF McCarthys with Karen Read and John Okeefe hours before investigators claim that she murdered him. Proctors interview with him (which didn’t happen until 3 months later while a grand jury was being presented with the case) quotes James Sullivan as saying that Karen seemed “toasted”. He adamantly denies saying this. When he was issued a witness summons for the trial he met with Lally and McLaughlin and told them that Proctor lied in his report about this comment, and that he had said much more complimentary things about Karen. For that reason they never called him as a witness. From the beginning this coverup was more about who they DIDNT choose to speak with, than it was about proactively planting evidence. Lucky Loughran, Colin Albert, Tristin Morris, Sarah Levinson, Julie Nagel, James Sullivan - they didn’t speak with any of these people because none of them saw what witnesses should’ve seen if John was killed by Karen.

[Gigi @Stacey144443]

@DoctorTurtleboy He is scared!! He knows what he did!! He knows he is corrupt!! He knows he may face jail for his actions!! He should go to jail for what he has done to not only Karen and Adain but to the countless of other casses he faked, planted evidence, and unjustly targeting people of color