@JamesAnderson88 Anyone who thinks that bitcoin will continue to magically increase by 30% year going forward for the next couple decades is either lying or stupid. First it needs to go up 100% to get back to where it was a year ago.
@paullecoque Don’t worry both are overvalued hot garbage. There’s only 10% of QNT shares being traded at the moment that’s the reason no financial metric matters. Anything looks cheap compared to QNT even IONQ which isn’t much better
@FrancescoFlami4@Stefano47271344 Only 10% of the QNT shares are being traded the remaining 90% belong to pre-IPO holders who cannot sell yet. Anyway both are shit companies
@InvestorDenis IONQ may or may not be the most advanced but their CEO, Nicolo de Scammer, is the biggest con artist of all of them. In the same week he’s giving talks and interviews to pump his stock he’s selling 2.6 million shares in 1 transaction. He’s the Wolf of Quantum.
@BastianelliLore I understand and I agree with your points but not your use of “rerate”:
In investing, rerating means the market assigns a higher or lower valuation to a stock or sector, usually by changing the multiple it is willing to pay for earnings, cash flow, sales, or other fundamentals.
@genejchan No you monkey. Only 10% of the shares are trading when the remaining 90% of shares held by pre-IPO holders can start selling in December it will drop like a stone. Secondly you don’t know what orders of magnitude means. And thirdly both stocks are shite
@BastianelliLore They have 40+ P/E so they could only give a very small dividend would not make a difference at all. If you want an e-commerce and fintech giant that gives huge dividends then get $KSPI