@AmericanAir@kleinbliss@AmericanAir then maybe your staff member should also show respect. Maybe not having gate agents yelling at customers. Yelling, at adults, like they're misbehaving children, because they are lined up waiting for their gate checked bags after being on a regional jet for 6 hours.
@ESPNPlusHelp thanks for not replying. I bought UFC 300, was never able to access it. Spent 40 minutes on hold before just asking to cancel and refund. Was told it’ll be 5-7 days until they can tell me if I will be refunded for something you never delivered. ignored here. WTF?
@ESPNPlusHelp Bought UFC 300earlier today. Now app wants me to buy again. I try to restore purchases & get message to call customer service b/c of a problem. Spent 40 minutes on he phone to be told it’s going to take 5-7 days to tell me if they were able to cancel my order?
@joey_labas12 Best of luck to you. Thanks for everything you did for the program. You won that bowl game, something not many can say, and by all accounts, you’re a hell of a teammate. Best of luck and much success as you go forward.
@chilzthesavage@chrisplatt14@ChandranTheMan BJJ practitioner/competitor here. I’ve never heard of a triangle being banned. It’s a basic move that even white belts are taught.
@She_Rhymes@ambrice299@caustic_o@natecardingolf@DavidEickholt Article 7 specifically excludes fouls that are not specifically reviewable. In other words, something like running the game clock, or having the wrong down is reviewable, but not a missed call.
@jamiemccollough@ByCodyHills@ChadLeistikow@ScottDochterman But you don’t get to review everything in a scoring play. In a YD from a QB sneak. If the guard false starts and it’s not called, you can’t go back and call a false start and take the TD off the board. All scoring plays are reviewed, for the things that are reviewable.
@She_Rhymes@mrbojangels90@ChadLeistikow Except they didn’t review advancing the ball after a fair catch signal. They reviewed whether the signal itself was valid. That’s what was announced on the field.
@alluvialrooster @mrbojangels90@ChadLeistikow Even scoring plays have limits on what can be reviewed. QB sneak and the guard has a false start….if the false start wasn’t called on the field, it doesn’t retroactively go back to be called.
@ambrice299@caustic_o@natecardingolf@DavidEickholt I’d submit that they were not reviewing advancing the ball after a fair catch signal. That’s not what was called. They were reviewing whether the signal was valid, which does not seem to be listed as being reviewable.
@AustinHanson7@GlalieMayor@stlbenchmafia@BlakeHornTV You don’t get to review everything. Even on scoring plays there are certain things that are reviewable and things that are not. An uncalled false start, for example, is not reviewable even on a scoring play.
@stlbenchmafia@BlakeHornTV Every time a punt returner moves their arms laterally, like when running under a kick, some Jack wagon ref could say that is a waving motion and an invalid signal. VI is designed to prevent someone from faking a fair catch and running it. Clearly NOT what took place here.
@Nate_Tice I don;t understand how there can not be a flag on the play, they watch replay, then announce a penalty on a non-reviewable penalty. You can’t go back and watch the tape to see what you missed.
@Nate_Tice There was no flag on the play. A fair catch signal is not a reviewable play. I don’t understand how the refs went to replay and made a call they missed.