@MilesDCarver@DavidSKrueger The scenario you describe strikes me as a very good example of why AI development must be paused -- things could easily go horribly wrong.
@MilesDCarver@DavidSKrueger It seems the arrogance goes the other way...? AI companies believe they are entitled to expose all of humanity to a very real extinction risk.
@SydneyLWatson Predation can be a big problem. You think you're just getting a few chickens (fun! fresh eggs!), but you're signing up for a dark, Darwinian struggle. The neighbour shot three coyotes over a couple weeks, wasn't happy about it.
@TheSimonEvans @ariaclast He wrote a useful monograph called "On Drink", full of practical advice such as how to mix drinks when you are nearly out of liquor (pour a teaspoon of gin into a glass of tonic over the back of a spoon) and how to deal with hangovers, both physical and metaphysical.
@vividvoid@pli_cachete I'm surprised at how nettled people are at this guy's choices. It may be he found the life voluptuously pleasurable and profoundly meaningful. That seems to upset people who find meaning in doing things, in being smart, in worldly success.
@DavidSacks This is a very typical example of a widespread fallacy among people who consider themselves reasonable and thoughtful and informed. "Existing models are safe, therefore we should continue to develop possibly dangerous models." It is not worth the fucking risk.
“Sir Conrad thought that politics should be transacted lightly, by clever men, and not ponderously, by stupid ones.” –from “The Blessing” by Nancy Mitford
Have been looking for a way to describe my stance with respect to AI (skeptic, doomer, worrywart, -phobe), have decided on “AI conscientious objector”.