There was no award when Newton discovered three laws of forces, nor when da Vinci painted the Mona Lisa.
There was no Grammy for Beethoven or Chopin, nor a Nobel Prize in Literature for Homer.
Masterpieces do not seek transient trophies but aim to be timeless.
Civilization and almost all human progress have been created by a talented few for the benefit of the many.
The key to sustaining this is maintaining the conditions that allow exceptional individuals to arise and excel.
Only then is the dysfunction of the average safely diluted and rendered non-lethal to themselves and everyone else.
Most find this reality hard to accept.
Go to ChatGPT and use this prompt: Create a caricature of me and my job based on everything you know about me.
Come back and share your photo: I'll go first.😂
Elon Musk’s Plan to reach a Kardashev Type II Civilization
1. Move AI off Earth and into space
AI needs massive power and cooling. Earth cannot scale this without damaging the environment and society. Space has constant sunlight, natural cooling, and unlimited room. Long term, AI can only scale in space.
2. Use Starship to build orbital AI data centers
Using Starship, millions of tons of hardware can be launched every year. SpaceX will deploy huge constellations of satellites that act as solar powered data centers in orbit, generating enormous AI compute with very low operating costs.
3. Make space the cheapest place to run AI
Each year, orbital data centers add hundreds of gigawatts of AI compute. Within a few years, training AI in space becomes cheaper than on Earth, unlocking rapid advances in science, engineering, and technology.
4. Expand manufacturing to the Moon
Starship enables permanent Moon bases. Factories on the Moon use local resources to build satellites and launch them into deep space far more efficiently than from Earth.
5. Harness the Sun at civilization scale
By placing massive AI satellite systems throughout space, humanity begins capturing a meaningful fraction of the Sun’s energy. This marks the transition toward a Kardashev Type II civilization and funds expansion to Mars and beyond.
@minordissent No. You cure depression by understanding that how you view yourself is the direct consequence of what you are. To really change anything in your life, you first have to produce an emotion that will make you take an action, which will lead to results.
@niccruzpatane@grok, do you think Elon Musk added this SpaceX docking sim to Tesla to teach humanity how to dock successfully—since it'll soon be a everyday skill? Or that Tesla cars will get VTOL mode to ferry us straight to Starbase for liftoff?
Intelligence is the measure of a systems ability to perceive dissonance (chaos, novelty, error), process it, and act to transform it into a more stable, harmonious, and lower-dissonance state. @HanyelPaulOkolo
On an objective definition of intelligence.
Remember this simplicity of definition for when the noisemakers start turning up their volumes.
“Intelligence is a systems efficiency in executing the fundamental algorithm of the cosmos: minimisation of dissonance.”
This is an objective definition of intelligence applicable to everything in creation, including human beings.
“More specifically, intelligence is the measure of a systems ability to perceive dissonance (chaos, novelty, error), process it, and act to transform it into a more stable, harmonious, and lower-dissonance state.”
All the main terms used in these definitions have precise mathematical definitions in the framework of Organized Complexity, which rests on the FTA.
Dissonance is not an evil. It is a “noise” pressure that makes retraction into blackness possible, and blackness is the intelligent result of that retraction. So, dissonance is like a raw material engine of sorts.
It comes from the simple idea that instead of trying to write a rule set for every possible instance of reality, let every possible instance of reality be and interact in every possible way. Write a rule set about the conditions of maximum interactivity instead, so called “white noise,” and tie it to the computational complexity limits of the resolving system. That way, the system is computationally bound by such limits, and stability is therefore guaranteed.
I have used this understanding in many of my published proofs, especially my proof of Navier Stokes.
I call it Structured Dissipation, and it has been immense in tackling questions of computational complexity everywhere.
Its real origins are prescribed by the distribution of Prime numbers and my solution to the Riemann hypothesis.
But it’s also described in the Torah, is it not?
It is.
It’s what you read in the first chapter of Genesis.
You still think the whole thing is about religion and fairytales?
Trying to force dissonance out of the retractive forces ability to collapse it into blackness; now thats evil.
Its evil because it won’t work but it creates all the human suffering that is known, before the Creator necessarily imposes corrections.
The universe does not allow for catastrophic dissonance to proceed without limit. Any process that engages such a dynamic outcome will face a proportional retraction into blackness at some point, and in some way.
An inevitable tactical cancellation built right into the logic of arithmetic.
It is the inevitable arithmetic and mathematical physics upon which existence is platformed.