Starlight STEM

At Starlight STEM we are committed to improving public understanding of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics by working with teachers & schools

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@vivissiah @Mandlbaur @MaytheforcebeM @FeynmansGhost2 @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @DavidRu31988626 Notice the past tense there??

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur You do not have a mathematical physics paper, as has been repeatedly pointed out by the editors of... mathematical physics journals.

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@vivissiah @Mandlbaur @MaytheforcebeM @FeynmansGhost2 @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @DavidRu31988626 That's going to be a struggle - because it doesn't.

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

Making space for space at Spoughton Tithe Barn

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur It seems that you are unwilling to engage with some real physics that might help you with your angular momentum problem. You are in some respects like the Philae temple complex

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur
Do you agree that a = GM/r^2, where a is the acceleration experienced by a dropped object, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Earth, and r is the distance from the centre of the Earth?

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur Sorry either a= gm/r^2 hold or it does not hold. Either bodies fall in a vacuum at the same rate, or they do not.

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur Conservation of angular momentum is immaterial to this. Are you saying bodies of the same shape fall and have different velocities than?

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur I do not believe you have - please answer it

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur No I am asking you a simple question a=gm/R^2. Yes or No?

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@WorkElizab If your staff need tips to survive, you are not paying them enough.

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur I asked do you accept that a = Gm/R^2 for a falling object in a vacuum

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @FeynmansGhost2 @MaytheforcebeM @revoccue @DavidRu31988626 As your posting of editors' replies shows, you do not have a mathematical physics paper

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @FeynmansGhost2 @Ferrari_ball @MaytheforcebeM @revoccue @DavidRu31988626 It is not. The reference you use has been removed from later editions, and you only use a section of the quoted material

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur Please answer the orginal question

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Ferrari_ball @Mandlbaur @FeynmansGhost2 @sleenastevens @MaytheforcebeM @revoccue @DavidRu31988626 That is libel. We are looking at taking action against Mr Mandlbaur to make him retract his constant false comments.

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur All I see is you insulting others and making false claims. Again, I ask you. Do you agree that a = gm/r^2

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur So now you are unsure of Newtonian Gravity and Galilean relativity.
You really have jumped the shark.

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @Ferrari_ball @FeynmansGhost2 @revoccue @DavidRu31988626 Your statement is just plain wrong,

[Starlight STEM @StarlightStem]

@FeynmansGhost2 @Mandlbaur @sleenastevens @revoccue @Ferrari_ball @DavidRu31988626 and time