@GeorgePhilis@HSkelsen I can do or say nothing against what is a position based on "actus fidei".. It's not that he's a liar... it's most likely something worse...
@fantasifulla@CMusso6@maxdantoni@paolospagnolli2 Se dici che ti hanno portato in giro per Kiev dicendoti che a quello hanno dato 10 mila, a quell'altro 15 Mila senza fare un nome che prove vuoi portare?
@GeorgePhilis@HSkelsen The point: In 2014, they took you around Ukraine and explained that they paid people. In the same year, you praised Janukovyc's deposition.
Were you a hypocrite then or now?
Were you lying then or now?
@GeorgePhilis@HSkelsen Just one small problem: Sachs allegedly saw cash deliveries with his own eyes but in the first years after Maidan he didn't say anything but rather praised the Ukrainian turning point... was he lying then or today, when he gets paid 100-200 thousand dollars per interview?
@GeorgePhilis@HSkelsen If you (Sachs for example) don't provide evidence for what you say and limit yourself to saying "trust me" despite having said the opposite in the past, the problem is not what Calenda says... My 2 cents
@HSkelsen What was Sachs' "lie" exactly? Calenda didn't explain it - he just used some putin labels. Maybe it feels good to some people who need political therapy but responsible X users want to hear evidence π² (keep writing in english btw, it's good for discussion) π
@GeorgePhilis@HSkelsen You asked what evidence there is that Sachs was lying but you trust him without evidence and based only on his statements: that's the point.
@GeorgePhilis@HSkelsen So the evidence for what Sachs says is the same as Sachs's claims. But Sachs is the same one who after 2014 spoke about Maidan in enthusiastic terms without referring to US interventions... We are at the "Trust me, Bro"