Britain 2025: Foreigners with no ID get to enter and live at taxpayer expense.
Also Britain 2025: Citizens now can't see what's on the Internet without doxing themselves to the government.
Cheers @Keir_Starmer
@davidgustafson5@Alexarmstrong@elonmusk Agree that Labour and Cons have blown their credibility. Why would anyone trust them?
Problem is, Reform and Restore also lack credibility. They're political "hail Marys". A last roll of the dice.
We have to get very lucky for things to improve from here.
@JChimirie66677 This passing struck me:
"He said claims of racism must be swiftly rejected when there is overwhelming evidence in a specific case."
This implies that unless there is overwhelming evidence against them, minorities should be free to play the race card to avoid prosecution.
@MaryCherringto3@KEdge23 Also true but violence is a distraction and plays into the hands of the failed institutions.
I thought we were better than that. What's the end game here, anarchy?
@alanafox16@doveyymargeauxx@AWills1995 The circus that followed Floyd's death was unjustified and so is this.
We need the institutions that are failing to be fixed, not anarchy.
@ArchRose90@DPJHodges The BBC will happily take a bit of heat while running interference, making the conversation about something other than police failure.
BBC bias is well established, don't sweat that.
Stay focused on the cover up of police racial bias going back decades to the grooming scandal
@RetroCoast@SuellaBraverman Whilst the police conduct was grotesque and will further undermine confidence in an already distrusted institution it's the murderer who is the worst.
@Realmarko88@broodloper@ArdentSpeakr@sfrantzman That's the difference between high trust societies like we used to have in Europe and low trust, clan based, societies that predominate in large parts of the rest of the world.
@Towlie1981@DanielJHannan Convicted yes, but the judge gives a light sentence because of previous "good character".
Seriously we have actual murderers with "good character" now.
If arresting and mocking a fatally injured man instead of giving first aid isn't misconduct what exactly would police officers have to do for them to be found guilty?
https://t.co/pjzQ4pX72q
@JChimirie66677@Chris60712@JustMe19122792 A charge of misconduct in public office might be applicable in this case? It would not be blocked by a resignation like the disciplinary approach.
https://t.co/oZrJ6Hln0i
@Ed_Miliband We've got the highest consumer prices for electricity in Europe. We also rely on imports to keep the lights on.
That's what your clean power mission looks like to us.
@theresa_may Smashing windows and replacing them would generate economic value.
The problem is that it's not productive. Much like the wasteful net zero schemes.
The Macpherson Report and the murder of Henry Nowak are causally linked through the corrosive logic of multiculturalism and its institutional offspring: two-tier policing.
By the time he was stabbed to death in December 2025, 18-year-old Henry Nowak would have been eight years younger than the 1999 Macpherson Report. The nature of the former—and especially the police response—is directly tied to the latter.
Sir William Macpherson’s inquiry into the Stephen Lawrence case redefined institutional racism expansively. It instructed police to prioritise perceptions of racism from minority complainants. This well-intentioned reform, born of genuine outrage at one racially motivated murder, embedded a structural bias: complaints from certain communities received swift deference, while the concerns of the native majority were often dismissed as prejudice.
Over a quarter-century, this shifted the state’s posture from impartial referee to quasi-imperial active manager of ethnic sensitivities.
Fast-forward to Southampton, 3 December 2025. Henry Nowak, a Polish-British student, was stabbed five times—including a fatal chest wound—by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa, who was legally carrying a 21cm kirpan, a privilege extended to no others in British society. As Henry lay dying in his own blood, Digwa falsely claimed racial abuse (citing a bruised eye). Officers handcuffed and arrested the victim rather than rendering immediate aid.
Police later apologised—unconvincingly, particularly after the leaked bodycam footage emerged. The IOPC is investigating. This is not mere incompetence. It is the predictable outcome of Macpherson’s legacy: officers socialised to fear being labelled racist more than failing to protect life.
Listen to Henry’s father. Watch the leaked video and don’t look away. Henry didn’t get a dignified death. He died frightened, drowning in his blood while being mocked and then advised of his rights. Scriptwriters would be sent back to the room if they suggested something so on-the-nose in a gritty drama—yet this is grotesque UK reality.
People should be furious about it. The government is paralysed by ideology, fear, and cowardly shamelessness. Genuine media that holds power to account is in short supply.
Setting anger aside for a moment, multiculturalism erodes the pre-political loyalty that underpins state legitimacy—the special sauce of governance. When institutions apply justice asymmetrically—aggressive on Islamophobia or native 'hate', hesitant or inverted when minorities are perpetrators—trust collapses. This is textbook anarcho-tyranny.
Polls show historic lows in institutional confidence. Incidents like Nowak’s, amplified by grooming scandals, knife crime disparities, and uneven protest handling, accelerate the collapse.
The consequences are stark: feral zones in cities, rural-urban fractures, nativist backlash, and escalating intercommunal violence. Would you choose to walk your dog where Wayne Broadhurst was stabbed to death, or send your son to university where he might be degraded while dying and begging police for help? What would you do if violence and rape regularly targeted you and yours and the police seemed indifferent?
It used to be brushed off as part and parcel' of modern urban life, or 'don’t look back in anger'. That was low, dishonest, and weak. Now the strategy is silence—which may be the least bad option left for this dishonest, discredited government.
We are sliding toward the civil conflict I have warned of—not as cause, but as consequence—of Britain’s unravelling as a coherent nation. The drivers are obvious because they strike normal people faster, wider, and deeper. The reactions are predictable. War is adaptive behaviour; civil war is simply more brutal and socially miasmic. Henry’s killing is not an isolated tragedy. It is a chapter in a larger, nationally suicidal debacle imposed on ordinary people by a governance system that has grown functionally undemocratic over thirty years.
@SBozzled@PaulEmbery The problem for Paul, like so many, is "where does he go instead"?
There is no major party that can be trusted and to fall for the promises of the new parties is simply an act of despair.
He's fighting for an ideal, which in this case is not the worst option.