celajoy3

Wife, mom to 3 girls, slowly waking up

[Baron Coleman @baroncoleman]

I just had a massive revelation watching @ShawnRyan762 on @TuckerCarlson:

The reason Con Inc and the establishment shillbots constantly “income shame” @RealCandaceO and other content creators is because Con Inc can’t control financially successful people.

When Tucker Carlson and Shawn Ryan became independently wealthy and no longer dependent on metrics or money, they became free enough to be honest at all times.

And honestly is the one thing Con Inc and the establishment cannot tolerate.

They want content creators at an income level where they cannot be free to be honest.

So they income shame anyone they see breaking free from that model.

[Vivian Kubrick @ViKu1111]

Andrew

Let me offer advice.

Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.

When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.

Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.

That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.

Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.

Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.

You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.

That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.

So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.

Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.

You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.

@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @JohnMappin @ImMappin @joekent16jan19 @TRobinsonNewEra @LionelMedia @IanCarrollShow @AwakenWithJP @jimmy_dore @OwenBenjamin @leahfiles @realstewpeters @EstulinVz @RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith
@BlakeSNeff @TPUSA @DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel

[Andrew Zywiec, M.D. @AndrewZywiecMD]

I grow infinitely tired of the first sentence here. I don't know what goes on with the Candace situation, I don't watch podcasts. With that in mind, let me offer you all some sense.

In America, you are innocent until proven guilty. End of story. Anyone making the statement this idiot just made needs to reflect. And yes, it's idiotic, so spare me the self righteous virtue signaling. You do not condemn someone to guilt before seeing the evidence and going through a thorough process to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a human right. So, Kristan, I know you find logic and consequence challenging, evidenced by your failure as a pro life advocate, but bear with me here.

When a high profile political and religious figure, of which Charlie was both, is assassinated, no stone can be left unturned. Everyone close to him, every business relationship, every random quack letter with a threat, EVERYTHING must be investigated.

When this much money, power, and influence are involved, those closest must be met with ultimate scrutiny. Not as accusation, but as thorough investigation.

I find it ridiculous that such common sense must be stated.

As far as the ever obvious clown show arguments, let's put something to bed.

I don't trust our government. I don't trust any other government. When the most influential evangelical Christian on the planet is bankrolled by Jewish influence, which is a completely opposed theology, openly states that Israel is ethnically cleansing GAZA, as in, openly makes accusations of genocide, against the opposing religious influence that bankrolls his existence, one must factor this in. When donors, funding operatives, and world leaders are in the DMs, one must take that into account.

I am not saying Israel killed Charlie. I literally have no idea. I am saying how on earth can you rule any involvement out? Even secondary involvement. You think this is so irrelevant that it doesn't merit investigation? You think screeching "conspiracy" makes you sound rational or well intentioned? It doesn't. It makes you sound like a tone deaf sycophant with no desire for truth. And oppressive, thought policing tyrant.

I also believe that Erika Kirk has acted EXTRAORDINARILY strange in the wake of Charlie's death. Does that mean she killed him? No. Does that even mean something is off? No. People act weird all the time. What it does mean, is taking videos of Charlie in a casket and posting to social media is odd. The interviews are odd, the mannerisms are odd. The behavior is all odd, and there are odd things in the history. And that should ALL be taken into consideration. Again, on what planet is having eyes and ears and opinions on behavior some sort of thought crime?

Again, I haven't even spoken about this topic, and I have no clue who killed Kirk, and indeed I hold no position on it, but I find the shaping of narratives and the silencing of dissent, and the "mis and disinformation" campaigns akin to... COVID? Are you people are completely lost?

Given that this is the biggest political assassination since Kennedy, maybe people should stop being retards and look at the whole picture.

Is it possible some random transgender freak pulled off the greatest hit of our lifetimes? Sure. Is it likely, given the circumstances? Not at all. Trust your government at your own peril.

If you are incapable of having conversations on this topic, maybe sit at the children's table this Thanksgiving.

In closing, you will likely never know who killed Kirk. But someone will fall.

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@RealCandaceO @JohnMappin @baroncoleman Baron is the best! I literally laugh out loud almost every episode. All while maintaining a hi IQ outfit!

[Dan Bilzerian for President @ElectBilzerian]

Dear @RealCandaceO ,

Your historic decentralized investigation into the assassination of Charlie Kirk helped uncover a massive network of Zionist infiltrated Churches and NGOs across America and the World, whose leadership all seem to have ties to Military intelligence.

Everything Israel and Zionists accused Islam of doing... Having terror cells and waging a religious war... Is literally what Zionists are doing and who they are... To an unimaginable degree... From JFK to 911.

It's possible this knowledge made public is the single greatest pressure point to undoing whatever this Zionist cult faction running our government and military at the highest levels is.

Going into midterms, I believe developing a decentralized Network of Mommy Sleuthes, and Daddy Detectives across America to dissect every component of this Religious Cult Operation is pivotal.

Names, churches, businesses.

The devil is always in the details.

It's clear this same faction had something to do with Charlie Kirk and is the hand behind TPusa.

It's possible this is the thread that if properly identified and pulled, unravels the greatest demonic earthly force to ever exist.

The word Zionist must be made synonymous with Traitor.

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@CraigBrockie Guide

[Owen Shroyer @OwenShroyer1776]

Alex Jones, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson & Megyn Kelly need to do a panel response to today's Trump post ASAP.

No attacks, just policy & results. It'll get 100m views & force the administration to admit defeat on policy & results or perhaps generate results that we voted for.

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@TPUSA @PressSec Wrong. Just wrong.

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@TheoVon We love you Theo!!

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@megbasham @RealCandaceO Megan, why don’t you ask if you can see that video privately. Maybe they will share it with you. Report back.

[Ian Carroll @IanCarrollShow]

What time did you fly into Provo Andrew??? When did you board the plane @AndrewKolvet ???

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@RealCandaceO It was so hard to watch. I had second hand embarrassment. @sostalksmoney

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@BryceMLipscomb @RealCandaceO @IanCarrollShow @TuckerCarlson @AdameMedia @LibertyLockPod @AnaKasparian @bennyjohnson @Timcast @RealAlexJones @baroncoleman is a proving to be so insightful and I feel trustworthy

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@dbongino Debate Dave Smith

[celajoy3 @StephaniePals1]

@dbongino https://t.co/58jBOty9oi

[Final Cut Tile 🇺🇸 @FinalCutTile]

Take this video of @ComicDaveSmith and distribute it to Dan Bongino comment sections.

I would, but he blocked me. Thanks.

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

So we can kidnap the president of a foreign state, but we can’t deport foreigners from our own borders?

Do I have this right?

[🇺🇸Steve2A🇺🇸God🇺🇸Family🇺🇸Country🇺🇸 @lakemonstercl1]

Damn right, what's good for the goose is good for the gander!

[Oilfield Rando @Oilfield_Rando]

See that thing we just did to Venezuela?

That’s what I want done to Minneapolis, Seattle, Sacramento, Austin, Boise, Columbus, Detroit, Madison, NoVA, Raleigh, Atlanta, Lewiston, Chicago….