Stephen How

1 Wife, 5 kids, 1 De Rosa, 2 Treks and a Ribble. Exercise physiologist who talks a good bike ride.....
views are mine.

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@MillieMarconnni All of that and you don't mention CO2, which is the primary driver and regulated variable of breathing depth and rate for most people at sea level.

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@MichaelTakeMP If he were any smarter, he’d have an inferiority complex...

[Martin I. Jones @drmijones]

If you have hired good people, do not then treat them like children.
Do not tell them what to do and how to do it.

Listen to the full episode at https://t.co/uy71xRCoTt, then share this with a leader who needs to hear

[Steve Magness @stevemagness]

The IOC just announced their policy on DSD and trans athletes in the female category. Let's skip the outrage and go with the scientific facts:

The modern debate started almost 20 years ago with the rise of DSD athletes who were winning world/Olympics (See: Semenya and others).

It came to a head when DSD athletes swept the podium.

The had the single biggest performance boost we can get, androgenization. Something that none of their competitors could ever have.

So debates commenced...

It's important to put in context how big a boost males get from simply being males. It's a larger boost in performance than if you were Lance Armstrong or Barry Bonds and hopped up on all the performance enhancing drugs known to man.

That's how large it is. It's why from 100 meters to races hundreds of miles long, the performance differential is generally 10-15%. Even larger in some strength events.

Every male gets this boost. It doesn't men all men beat all women, of course.

There's significant overlap in performance. My wife is going to better than 99% of men in distance running.

But...that boost gives each male a 10+% jump in performance that no female ever gets. We can see it in the athletic data and the progressions of men and women at puberty.

So...governing bodies and experts debated what to do about it. Women were losing millions of dollars in total to folks who had a male androgenization advantage.

We went from doing nothing, not much of a real policy to eventually instituting testosterone rules.

THe thinking was, testosterone can be a surrogate marker. It also gave DSD athletes a venue to still compete in the male category. They could lower their T to typical female levels, and still race.

There were a few problems with this. First, it obviously only took into account CURRENT T levels. A large part of the boost comes from androgens through a lifetime.

Second, this was challenged in court by DSD athletes. It was a long process that led to some strange policies along the way (for instance, rules only applied to certain event groups). It was tricky to regulate and be fair, and telling someone they had to have a medical intervention to compete came with ethical issues.

So that was eventually scrapped. I'm simplifying and summarizing years long backs and forth, obviously.

Track and field moved to the policy the IOC just adopted a year ago. Using the SRY test as a screener.

Why? It was simpler, straightforward and applied to all females, so their wasn't a separate DSD and trans policy.

It also put the dividing line for segregating sports by sex instead of a surrogate marker.

It's a one time screener, and then with specific follow up if potential DSD.

There's an exception for CAIS athletes because androgenization has little to no effect on them. So they do not have an advantage.

So what? I've seen this policy framed as immoral, fascist, and even nazism...which is crazy...

But the point is...it's a result of 20 years of debate, research, and trying to figure out a solution to a tricky problem.

There's a lot of people who don't know or are ignorant to the decades this has been going on.

Why is it important to separate sports based on sex?

Because it's the biggest performance boost we could get. If we didn't, there would be zero professional women athletes in an open category.

That's how big the gap is. And I for one value and think women deserve the spotlight to compete and show off their hard work and talent.

I've spent my life coaching women at the elite level to do so.

You might here people say it's a ban. It's not.

Every athlete still has a place to compete. You can do so in the category that matches your biology, in open events, or recreational events that this does not apply to.

A rough analogy: Longevity guru Bryan Johnson can't compete in the under 18 category no matter what age score his crazy metrics say he is.

We have categories and classification to ensure everyone has a chance to compete.

Yes, we pick what categories are important. But it's hard to argue that sex isn't a very important one.

So there you have it. It's been 20 years in the making. It started with DSD athletes with an androgen advantage winning championships and has evolved from there.

It's not perfect. Nothing is. We've debated, shifted policies, etc. But lots of smart folks and researchers have been trying to figure out a just and fair solution for a long time.

[John Oliver @iamjohnoliver]

Hello again! Here's our piece from Sunday about Twitter. Bye! https://t.co/KqA7EUY18B

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@sharrond62 Jeez, you're gullible... or more likely deliberately misleading people 🙄

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@HolyoakeJ14576 @JMPSimor Fortunately we don't need to guess what Nigel Farage thought.

[GB Deaf Football @GBDeafFootball]

🇬🇧⚽️Squad Announcement | Deaflympics 2025 🏅

Mark Gill has officially announced his women’s squad selection for the 2025 Deaflympics.

👏🏻 Congratulations to all the players and officials selected - your hard work and dedication is admirable.

Sponsor a player or official for £250. Fill out this form to register your interest. First come first serve basis https://t.co/8m8D0KYs7E

#Deaflympics2025 #DeaflympicsGB #DeafFootball #GBDF #ProudToRepresent

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@DanNeidle Apples and pears. Not the same thing at all.

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@NickFerrariLBC @LBC Anything about Nathan Gill and Russia bribes... or would that be expecting too much?

[Mushtaq Bilal, PhD @MushtaqBilalPhD]

This is bad news. This is very bad news.

The US government has stopped the funding of PubMed, the most comprehensive database of biomedical literature.

Why would you do this? This database it literally a matter of life and death.

[Benji Naesen @BenjiNaesen]

Holy shit, that could’ve gone so much worse. 🙏

[Andrew Parnall @dontbrexitfixit]

Well hey! It was five years ago and involved £45,000,000! I want to focus on £4.50 that is happening right now.

Yeah, OK Bob!🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@Neilovichi @LBC @TiceRichard @AndrewMarr9 🤔

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@SebGorka @BBCNewsnight Just popped by for the replies. It was worth it 🤣

[The Secret Barrister 🦋 @BarristerSecret]

I would encourage as many people as possible to complain to @Ofcom about this fraud perpetrated by GB News on its viewers.

As Jaime explains, this is not a matter of opinion. It is literal fake news pumped out by a propaganda machine.

[Stotfold FC Women @StotfoldFCWomen]

Thank you to everyone who has donated to help Keira get to Tokyo! With only 4 days left to achieve her goals of getting to Tokyo to represent Great Britain, your support is still needed.

The women's team still need around 16,000 collectively to secure their accommodation for the event!

As stated before, this will help Keira achieve her ambition to represent Great Britain on one of the biggest stages out there. This could be her one and only chance so lets try make it happen!

If anyone would like to donate to help Keira achieve success on the deafylmpic stage, her fundraising page is via the below link:
https://t.co/7iVGBvM2lZ

If anyone knows of any businesses that could assist via a sponsorship package, please ask them to contact [email protected]

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@EternalSunrise7 @implausibleblog Really - you'll get arrested and thrown in jail just for saying you're English - when did that come in?

[Peter Stefanovic @PeterStefanovi2]

THE SHOCKING state of NHS dentistry in England is today again laid bare

Where is the Governments promised plan to fix it @wesstreeting?

If you are one of the 13 million people now struggling to access NHS dental care RT this jaw dropping report & join me in asking him

[Stephen How @Stephen_How]

@DrEenfeldt @DietDoctor 0.8 g/kg is 25% above the average requirement (+ 2 SD) so should be fine for 97.5 % of the population. Some would benefit from more though.