@lauriewired So consumers lose ownership like it’s communism, keep paying monthly like it’s capitalism, and companies capture all the efficiency gains. Sounds about right.
@ChananBos@satyanadella Its dishonest bullshit. The very top tier of human capital gets way more valuable. But anyone AI can replace becomes worth less, and AI gets better at replacing people every day. So no, human capital as a whole does not become more valuable.
@armandlabs@FurkanGozukara@satyanadella I agree AI makes employees far more productive. That’s the problem. A company won’t need 10 AI powered workers at 10x with token capital; it can keep one operating at 100x with massive token capital and replace the rest. Repeat that and you get major labor contraction.
@FurkanGozukara@satyanadella Exactly. Once AI outperforms a certain level of human worker, companies will replace that worker. Reaching the highest percentiles will be extremely difficult, but AI does not need to replace the very best to cause massive disruption. We will enter dangerous territory very soon.
@satyanadella What BS. Human judgment may become more valuable while far fewer humans are needed. A small group will control massive “token capital” built from everyone else’s knowledge. That’s automation dressed up as empowerment.
@YoshkaMJ@confusedorlean I know people at Oracle who probably make around 20% less than at Google or Amazon, but they’re fully remote and work like 20 hours a week. YMMV of course but its extremely chill for them.
@willo2_Poly@shayne_coplan You can make decent money on Polymarket by spotting these “ambiguous” markets that really aren’t ambiguous at all, and betting as if UMA will somehow rule against the obvious outcome. It’s honestly sad. Most people get burned once, lose trust, and leave.
@RioStaysTrue >they did try to fix everything they could
lol. Stubhub does the typical - offer you shitty seats as replacements or a refund. both of which are terrible in the grand scheme of things