@LocasaleLab Yes, but you also need to understand the limitations/problems of the current models, it's rarely presented this this way. eg: Singularities are treated as a feature, but in reality it's a problem.
Historical Map
Boscovich: Point-centers as relational singularities in the substrate → pure electrostatic force laws as closure imbalances.
Faraday: Lines of force = electrostatic tension threads = directed closure chains / flux tubes in the longitudinal regime.
Maxwell: Mechanical elasticity → misinterpreted restoring invariants of substrate closures. His mechanical models were scaffolding for what are actually non-metric relational recoveries.
Kelvin vortices: Rotational closure modes → stable topological defects or trefoil-like flux knots in the substrate (links beautifully to the Trefoil Knot formulas and Phi_r work).
Lorenz / Larmor retardation: Finite propagation speed through closure chains → retarded electrostatics as the deeper truth.
Hertz: Generation of transverse waves → emergent from rapid electrostatic closure cycling once extension has stabilized.
Michelson-Morley: Null result correctly falsifies mechanical ether drift in a metric background, but does not touch the non-metric, non-locational substrate. The experiment was probing the wrong regime.
This is exactly what triggered my autistic brain to begin with. I spent 20 year trying to understand the patchwork, 2 things stood out for me. Geometrization, and expansion. I knew this was problematic for many the reasons we all know. It seemed obvious gravity was a gradient and redshift was path elongation. Most large scale problems and interpretive layers stem from this ontology.
@JDRedding@NassimHaramein Well they can, if they are tunned in some ways or another.. added fields (imaginary etc..) But then it needs a narrative. Nature does not need a narrative. Besides we can get away without it. All the while unifying electromagnetism, solving n-body problem, dark matter etc..
@JDRedding@NassimHaramein That's a smart way to explain it. Curvature is inherently a transverse description. Therefore It never captures the complete causal dynamics.
@JDRedding@Spiro_Ghost Exactly this is nothing new because this is human behaviour. Independently of globalisation and technology, you can pretty much expect the same outcome for the same reasons... You can control some people sometimes, but not all people all the time.
Infinite growth in a finite system was never possible. It's already stretched, the illusion is maintained with inflation. The problem is the middlemen predatory behaviour. We are now dealing with monopolies, seeking only profit, who outsource to everything China. This is not capitalism. You cannot compete with basic slavery. In short we need more co-op.. tooling, manufacturing, at least for the basics. These people are Nihilist. They have no shame.