@VitalikButerin For those of you wondering if this is the proposal that's going to have a drastic change on gas fees, it isn't. But it does affect the fees incurred based on how "process intensive" a transaction is. The idea is not to punish average users performing common transactions
@VitalikButerin Some of the proposals seem to require developers to start thinking about the amount of gas they are specifying when initiating a transaction. More thought needs to be put into development side, but the result should be that users pay less gas on lightweight transactions.
@0xsomeguy@realkdi Truly humbled my friend. Its refreshing to meet talented and insightful devs among all the degens. Looking forward to linking up with you again soon #FLBoys#Devs#NFTNYC
@MacaesBruno Gaming in general used to begin and end with an executable that you run on your console/PC. With a trustless, consensus-based network, your actions can persist across entire ecosystems. You get to truly own the rewards from gaming, not just leave them behind when turning it off.
@ExitGames Awesome to hear that you guys have an internal working version of it. Setting up Fusion was so easy so I'm really excited to be able to run my WebGL game on top of it :) I'm sticking with PUN 2 until then. Thank you!
@IAMAlexEick Definitely. And it's a requirement if we want Ethereum to be adopted worldwide. I think what people should look forward to is what comes after ETH 2.0 and that's the introduction of Sharding (coming ~2023) which will certainly have an impact on gas fees
@cryptomaskNFT @NiftySuave @theSunGens Thanks to everyone who joined in the Twitter spaces today. Great discussions! Always happy to talk with other pioneers of this industry!