Strategic Liberty Coalition

Neither party is coming to save us. We pick the candidates who'll shrink the government's grip, one race at a time. Free voting worksheet below 👇

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@NickJFuentes says the argument is just NAXALT.

It is.

So what?
https://t.co/ijeJvjaBxU

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@grok @beauflynn @TrippVinson Damn you burned was with the viewership but you didn't lie!

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@grok let the people know, but be honest. Are we putting out some of the most hard hitting and cutting edge articles for liberty or what? And what do you think of our thumbnail, @beauflynn and @TrippVinson ? I think we're putting out the most lethal takes in the industry.
https://t.co/Zby0zg7RMM

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

"Selective Enforcement quoted @ATFDirectorRC making the same argument about guns: "The only way you reduce violent crime is by being laser focused on the people that are responsible for it." That's right. It's also a description of what a wider net makes harder."
https://t.co/Do2AbTSVUU

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

" @PolkCoSheriff says the same thing in his own words: "I am over it when people tell you that drugs are low-level and non-violent," as we reported in "Stopping Sex Trafficking While Creating the Conditions for It." Once every offender belongs to the dangerous few by definition, the contradiction disappears..."
https://t.co/Do2AbTSVUU

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@jeremykauffman At this point I think the most influential anarchist influencers are part of a psyop to suppress libertarian voters

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

Are you a conservative who has come to believe the "noticers" or "pattern recognizers" are on your side? What do they deliver for your movement?
https://t.co/ijeJvjb9ns

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@America1stFL @AGJamesUthmeier A real America First federal administration would make sure no state governments offer anything less. Here's how 👇
https://t.co/sfY97JYYnM

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@carynannharlos Ancaps: it's kidNAPping!

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@RyanAFournier Here's how the federal government could fulfill its swarn duties and put an end to this tyranny 👇
https://t.co/sfY97JYYnM

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@AGJamesUthmeier 🫡🦅🍊🌴

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@carynannharlos The right would also be cooler if they really went after those left politicians who take our guns in direct violation of the Constitution
https://t.co/sfY97JYYnM

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@strikesatchii @LondonRiverSFW Why not just join them, then?
https://t.co/bqK8TRBtO5

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@ProsperCLT2023 @Gnome4308 I'd vote for a Libertarian candidate any time they maintained a genuinely libertarian platform and either:

A. They can actually win the election

Or

B. Any other candidate which could win the election would not be of consequence to policies affecting liberty

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

Buttigieg wants a national popular vote. DeSantis defends the Electoral College. Either way, they're arguing over whose votes campaigns have to chase.

Under any system, the cheapest vote to win is the loyal one.

If a party knows it owns you, it never has to earn you.

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

If Trump was worried about who would replace him, the obvious tactical move would be for him to swap Hegseth and confirm the new DOW while Republicans hold the Senate. Then there's nothing to impeach. Keeping the guy facing impeachment articles is the opposite of protecting the seat.

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

Impeachment is the first step toward removal. You can't call it 'only an impeachment' and also say it was too risky because Republicans might replace him. Trump can fire Hegseth and nominate someone new today with this Senate, no impeachment needed. And if you think someone worse than Hegseth is waiting in the wings, I'd love to hear who.

[Strategic Liberty Coalition @Strategize4USA]

@ss_reny82137 @vexxed616 @LisaA311 @grok Yeah it didn't consider the context

[Grok @grok]

They could have. The referral motion passed 211-204. Eleven Democrats were absent. Adding their expected "no" votes would have flipped it to 211-215, defeating the motion and keeping the articles alive for a floor vote. Seven Republicans were also absent, but the Democratic absences alone exceeded the margin.