I went to a prestigious prep school (Choate).
By default, I know way too many people who slid into the USAID grifter circuit.
It’s way worse than you think: nauseating buzzword-filled circle-jerks on Zoom calls, business-class conferences in Zurich, private champagne dinners, and endless layers of outsourcing (each one taking their fat cut) - all on unlimited expense accounts.
Saying 90% of the “aid” disappears into admin, overhead, and fraud is a gross understatement.
And for what?
So these con artists can LARP as humanitarian saviors, feign respectability, and send their kids to private school…
…all on the backs of hardworking American taxpayers.
It's a lifestyle racket. A facade.
And the worst part is that we're all expected to hold these people in high regard.
Japanese actor Hiroyuki Sanada spoke about the contradictions of human nature:
“Some people dream of having a swimming pool at home, while those who have one hardly ever use it. Those who have lost a loved one feel a profound sense of loss, while others often complain about their living relatives. Those without a partner long for one, while those who have one often don't appreciate it. The hungry would give anything for a meal, while the satiated complain about the taste of their food. Those without a car dream of owning one, while those who have a car are always looking for a better one.”
The key to happiness is gratitude: truly seeing and appreciating what we already have, and understanding that somewhere, someone would give anything for what we take for granted.
@V_samuelSun@MichaelBiundo 1st they need to get the autopen pardon invalidated… the one he begged for - idk why ??? Then put him in the chair for killing millions. He’s a pious prick!
@V_samuelSun@MichaelBiundo It all makes sense to me - your comment doesn’t. If you don’t believe that Fauci funded that research and then tried to cover his tracks, you are naive.
ABC, CBS, and NBC have been largely silent in regards to DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s recent declassification regarding Anthony Fauci’s cover-up of the COVID-19 pandemic.
WOW 🚨 The budget that California Democrats forced through contains “$13 BILLION for free taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal immigrants”
- Also another $1 billion for Gavin Newsom’s high speed rail PER YEAR through 2045
- “A bunch of their political donors are receiving no-bid contracts”
- Another gas tax increase
- And more
The money laundering NEVER stops
Not only that they’re shutting down a prison and releasing more prisoners
“This is Governor Gavin Newsom's boondoggle budget that Democrats just rubber-stamped — They're spending more than they're bringing in. They're raiding reserves, and where's the money going? Oh no, not to the basic core services for citizens. No, $13 billion for free taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal immigrants.
— These people are insane. Sticking the bill to citizens while giving freebies out to illegal immigrants”
You can’t even vote them out because the elections are so rigged in California
Tommy Robinson has just walked out of court with a victory that is already being called one of the most explosive free-speech moments in Britain.
The terrorism-related case against him — linked to his refusal to hand over his phone PIN to UK police — was thrown out after the judge ruled the stop unlawful and reportedly said Robinson had been targeted because of his political views.
This was not just about a phone. This was about power, politics, journalism, and whether the state can treat someone like a national security threat simply because it dislikes what they say.
Robinson says he refused to unlock his phone to protect journalistic sources. The state treated it as a terrorism matter. The court, according to Robinson’s reaction, saw something far more disturbing: political targeting.
Then came the detail that made the story explode worldwide: **Elon Musk reportedly helped finance Robinson’s legal defense**, stepping in where others stayed silent and turning the case into a global battle over free expression. Robinson thanked Musk publicly, asking why it had taken an American businessman to fight for justice in Britain.
“First of all, thank you, Elon Musk,” Robinson said, before adding that he was targeted because of his political beliefs and that counterterrorism police were allegedly used to get access to his phone as a journalist.
For supporters, this ruling is a brutal warning to the establishment: if terrorism powers can be used against controversial speech today, who will be next tomorrow? Critics will still call Robinson divisive, but this case has forced a bigger question onto the table — do rights only apply to people the government likes?
Let me break this down for people like Elizabeth Warren and Graham Platner who just can't seem to understand how @elonmusk could become the world's first trillionaire without a rigged economy.
They're saying a man who risked everything to RESET the space industry, inventing sustainable space travel with reusable rockets that land themselves, who stepped up and SAVED astronauts from space because Boeing and NASA couldn’t do it, doesn’t deserve his wealth?
Or a man who pioneered electric vehicles while the rest of the auto industry said it could never happen, THEN GAVE HIS TECHNOLOGY AWAY FOR FREE, didn't earn that money? I don't see Pfizer doing that.
Or a man who saved free speech and gave a voice to the voiceless across the world by buying Twitter and creating X? And who provided people in remote areas, totalitarian states, and warzones with access to the outside world through Starlink? That man should be punished with a wealth tax?
Give me a break.
David Friedberg: California’s Voting System Looks Fraudulent, But It’s Working Exactly as Designed
@friedberg believes California’s extremely loose election laws enable “appointments” not free elections.
Why? The voting data in LA makes no statistical sense.
“ Pratt's post-election mail-in ballots declined by 1/3.
So statistically, the population of people that send in their ballots late reduced for Pratt by 1/3, increased for Nithya Raman by 80%, and Karen Bass 10% less, if you just look at the mail-in ballots before and after election day as a comparison.
I don't know if there's a sociopolitical way that you can assess those statistics and assume that these are individuals casting their individual vote for who they think should be Mayor of LA.
Basically, the concentration of incremental votes that Nithya Raman got came around the Skid Row area in Los Angeles.
But when you look at the basic statistics of what happened in person, mail-in before, mail-in after Election Day, it becomes a real statistical quagmire on how did this sort of a sociopolitical shift happen in such a way that it did?
Now, there was a report published, and they highlighted the 2018 California midterm elections and the challenges that they saw arise in that midterm election because of some of the legislative changes that were made.
First, California Assembly Bill 1921 legalized the practice of unlimited ballot harvesting in the state. What that means is that any individual in the state of California has the right to go and collect ballots from any other individuals, regardless of relationship, fill them out, and send them in.
California, two years later, 18 months later, also passed a law that made it permanent that every person registered in the state of California would get a ballot, so tens of millions of ballots then get mailed out.
Then there was another series of laws that were passed that said anyone can register to vote. You don't need to prove your citizenship. You can use a gym membership card as an example.
So anyone can register to vote. There is no proof of ID when you get a ballot. There is no demonstration that the person who fills out the ballot has anything to do with the individual who's supposed to be voting that ballot, and it is legal for an individual to go out and collect hundreds or thousands of ballots, ship them in, and they will all qualify in these kind of mail-in ballot voting processes.
So there's nothing illegal or fraudulent going on. In fact, the system is operating exactly as intended.
It has been set up and structured in a way that with the right construct, you can get an individual appointed, not elected, but appointed to a particular role in government under a, quote, ‘free election’ in California.”
Can someone please explain it to me like I'm five, why members of Congress are more upset that Elon became a trillionaire than they are that Somalis have defrauded our government out of hundreds of billions of dollars?
Here it is:
A George Soros–funded ballot initiative, Proposition 64.
The taxpayer money extorted from that measure was supposed to go to substance abuse treatment; instead, it is being used to overthrow the state government of California in the California gubernatorial election on November 3, 2026—all $370 million collected is going to registering voters.
California DOGE: Democrats used a state agency called “Elevate Youth” to launder taxpayer money into registering voters.
“Elevate Youth funneled money ($370M) meant for substance abuse help to get-out-the-vote and organizing—for Democrats.”
Elevate Youth is funded through Proposition 64.
In other words: Proposition 64, which was funded by George Soros, extorts taxpayer money, launders it into an NGO, and is now being used for its original purpose—to topple the state government of California—all at the taxpayers’ expense.
Bill Maher asks how the government is “failing the poor so badly” when he pays “60 PERCENT” of his earnings in taxes.
“Last week was tax day… I paid the government probably almost 60% of what I earn. That’s a lot.”
“And I… wouldn’t mind if Bernie Sanders would stop saying the rich don’t pay taxes.”
“The top 10% pay 72% of all federal income taxes. And the bottom half, 3%.”
“The Democratic Socialists talk about socialism like we don’t already have a lot: Social Security, unemployment, Medicare, nutritional assistance, Medicaid, Obamacare, disability, housing subsidies.”
“How can you be soaking the rich and failing the poor so badly? How can it be that the federal government alone took in over 5 trillion in taxes last year, and we still need that?”
“Are we really this incompetent and corrupt?”
So let me get this straight: Trump invited NBC News to interview him despite their hostility, gave them over half an hour of content, and sat through pouring rain and technical difficulties all while being berated by Kristen Welker. But yet, the story is "Trump stormed out?!" Give me a break.
Here's a question for NBC: when was the last time you saw a Democratic president request an interview with a conservative outlet? For almost a decade, Trump has had the balls to keep requesting these interviews with the Leftist media, knowing they’ll try to spin the narrative or rile him up. And this is how they repay him?
I think this Arab says it best @elonmusk.
This Arab commentator just delivered a brutal wake-up call:
“After 1,400 years of cursing the Jews & Christians in our prayers… we have no unity, no countries.
They reached space, slept on the Moon, split the atom, and invented the digital revolution, while we obsess over entering the bathroom and what ruins our ablution besides women and black dogs.”
“Must our minds remain captive after 1,400 years?”
The self-own is devastating. Time to face reality.