Dera anak perempuan umur 9 tahun sampai mati dengan alasan tinggal solat. Mula-mula paksa ‘push-up’ 500x. Bila anak tak larat, kau pijak perut sampai pankreasnya pecah.
Nabi ajar kalau anak tinggal solat, rotan, bukan bunuh. Buang saja kopiah atas kepala tu, buat malu Islam.
Abdulrahmān al-Ghāfiqi رحمه الله, the legendary commander of Al-Andalus & leader of the campaign in France.
He was a Tabi'i who personally narrated Hadiths from the great companion Abdullāh ibn Umar رضي الله عنه, he was noted as a pious man.
His predecessor Anbasa ibn Sulaym..
@trader_mba@apanakdikato Dua kali lima lah!
Lagi satu, siapa yang terhegeh-hegeh nak turunkan Raja N9?
Ikut pertabalan di negeri Melaka pulak 😂😂😂.
Pergi jadi Sultan Melaka di sana lah kalau nak jadi raja sangat 😂😂😂.
An Important Matter! Why are Christians and Shi'aa have a lot in common!
After spending a considerable amount of time engaging with Christian apologetics, I've noticed a striking similarity between many of their arguments and those commonly used by the Rafidah (Twelver Shi'a) against Islam. The same recycled allegations, the same out-of-context quotations, the same misunderstandings, and often the same refusal to engage with the actual responses.
What's even more remarkable is a recurring pattern: when someone embraces Islam, they're quick to claim that person was "never a real Christian" or to dismiss their conversion altogether. But when someone leaves Islam or abandons Sunni Islam, they celebrate it, promote the story everywhere, and present it as though it somehow disproves the religion.
As Muslims, our faith is not built on conversion statistics or apostasy stories. Truth is not determined by how many accept it or reject it—it is determined by evidence. The Qur'an says:
"Whoever is guided is only guided for his own benefit, and whoever goes astray does so only to his own loss." (Qur'an 17:15)
Whoever believes does so for their own benefit, and whoever rejects the truth only harms themselves. The truth does not become false because people reject it, nor does falsehood become true because people embrace it. What ultimately matters is evidence, consistency, and sincerity in seeking the truth.
There’s many “Sunni identitarian” on this app that are no different than the Axis supporters when it comes to ignorance.
You’ll see them tweet out the most ridiculous theories. Loud against Iran but barely tweet about the “Sunni” countries doing the same.
If you think blending secularism and Islam is "lovable," then you haven't yet fully accepted Islam.
This is what "Muslim" in name only looks like these days and its expression in the disease called "politics":
Openly espousing Shirk while incorporating outward elements of Islam.
@Khairykj, rekod awam menunjukkan pendirian politik anda berubah mengikut kedudukan.
Pada Januari 2023, anda menyokong kestabilan Kerajaan Perpaduan pimpinan DSAI & menolak sebarang kerajaan pintu belakang. Apabila UMNO memecat anda tanpa surat tunjuk sebab atau proses pendengaran, anda mengisytiharkan diri "unbowed, unbent, unbroken".
Tapi selepas diterima kembali oleh UMNO pimpinan Zahid, orang yang memimpin parti ketika anda dipecat kini dipuji, sementara DSAI & PH pula menjadi sasaran. Sedangkan anda sendiri pernah mengakui bahawa DSAI berjaya menstabilkan ekonomi & meningkatkan keyakinan pelabur, walaupun manfaatnya belum dirasai sepenuhnya oleh Rakyat.
Jangan pula menggambarkan diri seolah-olah anda membina kerjaya politik melalui perjalanan akar umbi seperti ahli UMNO biasa. Rekod menunjukkan anda menyertai UMNO pada 1998, menjadi penulis ucapan Abdullah Badawi pada 1999, berkahwin dengan anak beliau pada 2001 & menjadi Timbalan Ketua Pemuda UMNO pada 2004-empat tahun sebelum dipilih sebagai Ahli Parlimen.
Anda sememangnya berpendidikan & kemudian memenangi pertandingan parti serta pilihan raya. Namun, rakyat berhak bertanya sama ada hubungan rapat dengan koridor kuasa telah mempercepatkan perjalanan awal politik anda.
Rekod kontroversi anda juga bukan sedikit.
Pada 2006, pembelian saham ECM Libra bernilai kira-kira RM9.2 juta melalui pembiayaan daripada pengasas syarikat mencetuskan persoalan awam mengenai konflik kepentingan kerana kedudukan anda sebagai menantu & penasihat kepada Perdana Menteri ketika itu. Anda kemudian menjual saham tersebut pada harga lebih rendah. Tiada sabitan jenayah terhadap anda dalam perkara itu, tetapi persoalan tadbir urus yang dibangkitkan kekal sebagai sebahagian daripada rekod awam.
Pada 2009, Lembaga Disiplin UMNO mendapati anda melanggar peraturan parti berkaitan politik wang & memberikan amaran. Anda menafikannya dan masih dibenarkan bertanding sebelum memenangi jawatan Ketua Pemuda UMNO. Itu merupakan keputusan disiplin parti, bukannya sabitan jenayah-tetapi ia tetap sebahagian daripada sejarah politik anda.
Pada 2016, ketika anda menjadi Menteri Belia & Sukan, seorang pegawai kanan kementerian ditahan berhubung penyelewengan kira-kira RM100 juta yang berlaku melalui kelemahan prosedur kewangan. Tiada bukti bahawa anda menerima wang tersebut, tetapi anda sendiri menerima tanggungjawab sebagai menteri terhadap kegagalan pengawasan itu.
Dalam pengurusan vaksin Covid-19 pula, PAC terdahulu menyatakan proses perolehan mendapat kelulusan Kabinet & Perbendaharaan. Tapi, laporan PAC berikutnya mendapati 8.5 juta dos bernilai RM505 juta telah luput akibat lebihan stok, penurunan permintaan & beberapa faktor lain. Anda kemudian menerima tanggungjawab terhadap lebihan pembelian itu. Ini bukan tuduhan rasuah terhadap anda, tetapi ia merupakan persoalan sah mengenai perancangan, unjuran & penggunaan wang awam.
MySejahtera turut mencetuskan persoalan PAC mengenai ketiadaan kontrak awal, pemilikan aplikasi, harta intelek & rundingan terus. Tiada dapatan bahawa anda memperoleh keuntungan peribadi, tetapi sebagai Menteri Kesihatan ketika sebahagian isu itu ditangani, rakyat berhak menilai tahap ketelusan & akauntabiliti pentadbiran anda.
Semasa PRU15, anda juga berpendapat bahawa semua calon tidak perlu mengisytiharkan harta sebelum rakyat mengundi; pengisytiharan hanya perlu dilakukan selepas seseorang dilantik ke Kabinet. Anda turut menyatakan bahawa anda pernah mengisytiharkan harta kepada SPRM sebagai menteri.
Tetapi jika ketelusan hanya datang selepas kuasa diberikan, bagaimana pengundi hendak menilai calon sebelum menyerahkan kuasa?
Jadi sebelum mengajar DSAI, PH atau rakyat mengenai prinsip, ketelusan & tadbir urus, jawablah rekod sendiri terlebih dahulu.
Ketika disingkirkan, anda bercakap tentang keadilan & pembaharuan. Selepas diterima kembali, nada anda berubah & sentimen Melayu-Islam kembali dijadikan modal politik. Pada pandangan saya, ini bukan keteguhan prinsip tetapi penyesuaian politik mengikut kedudukan.
Apakah yang sebenarnya berubah-fakta, prinsip atau peluang politik anda?
Yes, there is an authentic hadith stating that Satan “spends the night in the upper part of the nose,” and the Prophet ﷺ instructed Muslims to rinse their noses during ablution. Muslims accept this as part of the unseen (ghayb), not as a biological or medical claim.
Now let me ask you: do you reject every religion that contains supernatural statements? If so, do you also reject the Bible’s accounts of demons entering people and animals, Satan tempting Jesus, or evil spirits causing illness? Or do you only mock the supernatural when it appears in Islam?
Are you welling to answer these questions?
The mat sallehs are trying to make us feel guilty for kicking out NS by saying we’re heading backwards for rejecting them.
Hey, we already faced such situation when the British promised us better lives if we accepted their rule. When they ruled, Malay quality of life got worse.
It's amusing that few commentaries on "The Lazy Natives" made the connection between British colonialists calling Malays lazy and British capitalists calling British peasants lazy. The Brits are just rehashing the same propaganda they used against British peasants upon the Malay.
Gobind dan KDN kata business dia legit.
Francis Light mai Kedah pun datang kata nak niaga. Syarikat Hindia Timur British (EIC) itu pun legit business.
Tapi itu la. Semua lupa sejarah kan?
Was al-Shafi'i a "Proto-Ashari"? - A Defence of the Imam
Defending our noble Imam Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi'i al-Hashimi (rahimahullah) from the contemptible claim that he was a "proto-Ashari."
As the majority of later Asharis were Shafi'i in fiqh, it becomes easy for one to claim that the Imam must have had an influence on the formation of the Ashari sect. But a school of law is not a creed: on the attributes, on kalam, and on the created Qur'an, al-Shafi'i stood against the method and conclusions that Asharism is built on.
1. His creed in his own words
Ibn al-Qayyim, in Ijtima al-Juyush al-Islamiyya, records al-Shafi'i's belief, narrated by Ibn Abi Hatim from Abu Shu'ayb and Abu Thawr:
وأن الله تعالى على عرشه في سمائه، يقرب من خلقه كيف شاء، وأن الله تعالى ينزل إلى السماء الدنيا كيف شاء.
"...and that Allah is above His Throne, in His heaven, drawing near to His creation however He wills, and that He descends to the lowest heaven however He wills."
This affirms uluww, istiwa, and nuzul on their apparent meaning, without ta'wil or tafwid; the Ashari sect rejects this entirely.
2. His verdict on the mutakallimun
Asharism is a sect based on kalam. Al-Shafi'i's verdict on it is recorded by al-Bayhaqi, al-Khatib, and Abu Nu'aym:
حكمي في أهل الكلام أن يضربوا بالجريد والنعال، ويطاف بهم في العشائر والقبائل.
"My ruling concerning the people of kalam is that they be beaten with palm stalks and sandals and paraded through the clans and tribes," as the reward of one who abandons the Book and the Sunnah for kalam.
3. His verdict on the Qur'an and the
On the question that later defined the Ashari doctrine of divine speech, al-Shafi'i stood with the muhaddithin: whoever says the Qur'an is created is a disbeliever. Al-Lalika'i opens his chapter on the takfir of the Lafdhiyyah by naming al-Shafi'i first, through al-Rabi:
من قال: لفظي بالقرآن، أو: القرآن بلفظي، مخلوق، فهو جهمي.
"Whoever says, 'my utterance of the Qur'an,' or, 'the Qur'an by my utterance, is created,' he is a Jahmi."
The Asharis fall under the Lafdhiyyah because they deem the recited Qur'an, its letters and sounds, to be created, differing only in that they identify Allah's Speech with an eternal Kalam Nafsi rather than the letters and sounds themselves.
4. The real forerunners and ancestors of the Asharis
The ancestry of Ashari theology is a circle of mutakallimun who arose after al-Shafi'i and took up the method he condemned.
Abdullah ibn Sa'id ibn Kullab (d. c. 240 AH): the source; his kalam nafsi is what al-Ashari adopted.
al-Harith al-Muhasibi (d. 243 AH): took kalam from Ibn Kullab; Ahmad called him the root of the affliction.
Abu al-Abbas al-Qalanisi: a theologian of the same Kullabi current.
al-Husayn al-Karabisi (d. c. 248 AH): systematised the slogan that our utterance of the Qur'an is created,
Abu al-Hasan al-Ashari (d. 324 AH), born half a century after al-Shafi'i, was a Mu'tazili under al-Jubba'i for forty years before settling mainly on Ibn Kullab's positions. The Ashari al-Shahrastani himself traces this line to Ibn Kullab, al-Qalanisi, and al-Muhasibi; Ibn Taymiyya adds in al-Tis'iniyya that they took the root of kalam from the Mu'tazila.
5. Early Shafi'is who rejected Asharism
If Shafi'i creed were Ashari creed, the great early Shafi'i imams would have been Asharis. They were not, and several were rigid and stalwart opponents of the Ashari sect.
Imam Ibn Khuzayma (d. 311 AH), Imam al-A'imma and a contemporary of al-Ashari, affirmed the attributes against ta'wil in his Kitab al-Tawhid; the Ashari Ibn Furak wrote against it.
Imam Abu Bakr al-Isma'ili (d. 371 AH): set out the athari creed in I'tiqad A'immat al-Hadith, against the ta'wil of the mutakallimin.
Imam Abu Hamid al-Isfarayini (d. 406 AH), head of the Shafi'is of Baghdad in his day, stated : مذهب الشافعي وسائر الأئمة خلاف قول الأشعري، وقولهم هو قول الإمام أحمد, "the madhhab of al-Shafi'i and the rest of the imams is contrary to the statement of al-Ashari, and their position is the position of Imam Ahmad." He was also severe against the Ashari al-Baqillani.
Imam al-Lalika'i (d. 418 AH): the Shafi'i who compiled the takfir of the Lafdhiyyah cited above.
Imam Abu Muhammad al-Juwayni (d. 438 AH), father of the Ashari Imam al-Haramayn, is reported to have said that al-Ashari opposed al-Shafi'i and the salaf.
Imam Abu Nasr al-Sijzi (d. 444 AH): wrote a full refutation of the Asharis, al-Radd ala man ankara al-harf wa'l-sawt, naming them the innovators.
Imam Abu Uthman al-Sabuni (d. 449 AH): declared the Lafdhiyyah as Jahmiyya in Aqidat al-Salaf Ashab al-Hadith.
Imam Abu al-Hasan al-Karaji (d. 532 AH), a Shafi'i faqih, dropped the customary supplication for al-Ashari from the qunut and wrote a creedal poem on the way of the salaf disowning the Ashari sect.
Conclusion
The Asharis claim al-Shafi'i as an ancestor, but his creed condemns theirs.
Their sect kept his fiqh while abandoning his ban on kalam, and because it stayed Shafi'i in law it now claims him to be their progenitor.
Yet the same reasoning would make his own companions Asharis, which is absurd. Al-Buwayti, whom al-Shafi'i named to succeed him, died in a Baghdad prison rather than say the Qur'an is created.
Al-Shafi'i affirmed the attributes as they came, while the Asharis make ta'wil of them, and he ordered the people of kalam beaten while Asharism is a sect of kalam.
Sources
Ibn al-Qayyim, Ijtima al-Juyush al-Islamiyya, "Dhikr qawl al-Imam al-Shafi'i" (from Ibn Abi Hatim)
Abu Nu'aym, Hilyat al-Awliya 9/116; al-Khatib, Sharaf Ashab al-Hadith p. 78; al-Bayhaqi, Manaqib al-Shafi'i
al-Lalika'i, Sharh Usul I'tiqad Ahl al-Sunna 2/390, no. 599
al-Shahrastani, al-Milal wa'l-Nihal p. 81
Ibn Taymiyya, al-Tis'iniyya:
al-Hakim, Ma'rifat Ulum al-Hadith p. 161; al-Dhahabi, Siyar A'lam al-Nubala 14/380 (and 13/103 for Dawud al-Zahiri)
al-Isma'ili, I'tiqad A'immat al-Hadith; al-Sabuni, Aqidat al-Salaf wa Ashab al-Hadith
al-Sijzi, al-Radd ala man ankara al-harf wa'l-sawt:
Ibn Taymiyya, Majmu al-Fatawa 12/160 (for al-Isfarayini and al-Juwayni); Abd al-Baqi al-Hanbali, al-Ayn wa'l-Athar
al-Dhahabi, Siyar A'lam al-Nubala (entry on al-Karaji); Ibn Taymiyya, Dar' Ta'arud al-Aql wa'l-Naql
@abu_ramalx@Zac_labs Most of Malaysian Malays only want Malay rulership of Malaysia, even if the Malay leaders, from the Kings to elected government officials, have stolen money, killed people, did corrupt dealings, and even ruined government institutions.
Things I mentioned have happened.
@eddymafjj@Zac_labs Even before Farhash and Ramanan issues, most Malay voters already detested Anwar Ibrahim, in fact for many, many years even before he was elected Prime Minister by Malaysia's previous Head of State.
Most Malay voters will continue to say they never voted for him.
@tunas3ng@BendiTheBagak Semua boleh? Dulu zaman Pak Lah, Najib, Muhyiddin, bahkan Ismail Sabri dah lama benda ni berlaku.
Aku bukan pencinta PMX, tetapi Anwar dah cakap apa yang dia cakap dalam berita aku kepilkan di sini.
PM-PM terdahulu ada bersuara macam ni?
https://t.co/E6tbxInStd
@RYANRYAN0110 @f4kr0ls00d Hanya orang PAS je beriya-iya dengan Hadi Awang ni. Di luar parti PAS, orang awam umumnya tak angkat dia sebagai contoh pemimpin yang diteladani pun.