The Clarity Act takes the side of everyday Americans.
This historic legislation brings digital assets out of the shadows and into a system that is safer, fairer, and more transparent!
Bitcoin is not apolitical, it is anti-political.
Separating money and state IS removing the state.
Bitcoin is for people who don't want to be coerced by criminals who happen to have won a non-voluntary popularity contest.
It is an antidote to politics.
That's the whole point
Jaime Dimon is a Loser.
1. Shorted $MSTR.
2. Rejected Saylor's calls to embrace Bitcoin.
3. Financed Epstein's pedophile activities.
4. Debanked many people like Trump, Jack Mallers, etc.
5. Trying to stop the Clarity Act.
Do not mess with crypto bros and Bitcoiners.
You need to watch this interview with Jamie Dimon and understand how incredibly important the Clarity Act is for the banks to maintain absolute power over the people.
Jamie Dimon (aka the God King of fiat) speaks for the banks they are about to lose control to Bitcoin and crypto.
This is the single most important event in the institutionalization of crypto since the spot Bitcoin ETF was approved in January of 2024.
There are compromises being made on both the crypto lobbyist side as well as TradFi banking — Dimon does not want to compromise — he wants the banks to maintain absolute control like they have for decades — why wouldn’t he?
I am not a huge fan of Coinbase but Brian Armstrong is spearheading this campaign (with significant incentives) to offer a better opportunity for all investors in the U.S. and in crypto largely.
Dimon is trying to stifle innovation and Armstrong is pushing for it. Everyone should be rallying behind Coinbase and Brian right now — Dimon looks like a buffoon showing up on FOX to say he is “full of sh*t”.
This will eventually blow up in his face. The race to adopt crypto is much bigger than any one person, even Jamie Dimon. You cannot stop a technology whose time has come.
When the technology ultimately benefits the common person, those standing in the way of freedom technology will soon be run over.
@BorisJohnson Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi requires a central operator promising returns and paying early investors with funds from later ones. Bitcoin has no issuer, no promoter, and no guaranteed return—just an open, decentralized monetary network driven by code and market demand.
Our thoughts on digital credit and response to MSCI. Restricting passive index investment in $BTC today would be like restricting investment in oil and oil rigs in the 1900s, spectrum and cell towers in the 1980s, or compute and data centers in the 2000s.
Strategy has submitted its response to MSCI’s consultation on digital asset treasury companies. Index standards should be neutral, consistent, and reflective of global market evolution. Read our letter and share your support: https://t.co/yiPRYyw5Lk
Everyone seems to be concerned about things they don’t need to be concerned about.
You don’t need to worry about quantum computers killing #Bitcoin. Worry about QC cracking your nuclear launch codes.
You don’t need to worry about the composition of @tether’s reserves. They have an additional $30B of group equity outside of full reserves. Worry about your local bank that is definitely fractional and backed by a few rubber bands and chewing gum.
You don’t need to worry about at what price @Strategy will have to sell Bitcoin. Worry about equities you hold that have cash reserves deteriorating at 10% a year and worry about what price they will finally buy Bitcoin at.
Thanks for the concern but we don’t need it.
David didn’t need this role. He didn’t need the headaches, the divestitures, or the attacks. He stepped in because he didn’t want the US to fall behind on AI or digital assets, and he did it completely above board.
If the NYT had its way, government advisers would all be inexperienced career bureaucrats with no real-world understanding.
I am grateful that leaders like David are willing to serve.
Deeply grateful to have @DavidSacks in his role.
He's very thoughtful on AI and has deep integrity and resilience.
Technology is a strength of this country, and we need more Americans like David helping the US lead in innovation. 🇺🇸
This is indeed a frequent trope used against anyone competent who wants to serve. “Oh she has experience in that area — it’s a conflict!” is a frequent leftist smear against many people who gave up security and millions of dollars for constant attacks and petty bureaucratic BS.