SaccharinFeck

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@ZDN052529 @miss___kb Thanks for the tip 👍

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@ZDN052529 @miss___kb Thanks for pointing out the typo and not focusing on the point I was making.
You are doing God's work 👍

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@AJJBOH4 @miss___kb Kids deserve parents who actually parent.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@Derbyshire78850 @iamivank Wow that's a really interesting take

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@iamivank They aren't after your data. They want you to stop reading stuff that shows you what is actually happening and questioning the narrative legacy media gives you.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@JamesCAutumn @iamivank Clearly it is for some.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@rickyhewitt_dev Good link to read thanks for taking the time to post it.

The majority of people use a VPN app and will not dig that deep to circumnavigate a ban so it will still mean that most of the population will have to comply.
Those that don't and get caught will get punished.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@Danjsalt It's not about protecting kids it's about monitoring what you access on the Internet as an adult. That's the point of it.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@GoulderMatt @TheBritishIntel I don't talk to kids on line but I do go to sites that Israel doesn't like and comment on posts about genoice they conduct.

Looks like I might be black bagged like a scene from the movie 'V for Vendetta' going forward.
Suppose it might beat room 101 from 1984 though.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@Alonso_GD Makes sence but it isn't about protecting children it's a out keeping tabs on adults.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@writtenoff_mufc Because it's not about kids it's about monitoring and controlling the access to the Internet of adults.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@Newareopagitica @Shambles151 He'd be charged with that offence though wouldn't he?
Not sentenced for it after he was found guilty of ABH.

& let's just say if he had Tourette Syndrome then he would be allowed to raise this as a defence wouldn't he?

Don't know where you practice but give up your day job.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@james_e_b_ Here's a scenario for you.

Say BMW bought Rover in the 30's & Longbridge made vehicles for export used specifically by the Nazis to mass transport prisoners to concentration camps for extermination.

If people protested at the time would you agree they should have been jailed?

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@Andy76948 @AshurShahana What was Connolly charged with and what was she convicted of?

Now imagine if you damaged a door and were found guilty.
Then imagine you were convicted of destroying the whole building.

This is where this precedent leads.

[SaccharinFeck @SugarBonk]

@Newareopagitica @Shambles151 That's sound advice.

As an experienced lawyer what's your thoughts on finding someone guilty of an offense they weren't charged with, that was decided they were guilty of, without asking or even allowing them to disclose their intent at the time to the Court?

[Roger Gall @Shambles151]

It's pretty damned obvious that it's not possible for a defendant to mount any form of adequate legal defence against offences they are not charged with.

Please RT this until this injustice is corrected.

Thank you.