Sometimes on campus you accidentally walk past a historicist classroom and the professor is writing like "Hamlet = 1600" on the board and the students are writing it down like it's actual school
Few things I abhor more than having to justify my interest in the humanities. I am a mass democratic consumer and my chosen vice is “wisdom”. Leave me alone!
IME, evaluating on style is softly discouraged bc it can introduce bias. I'm thankful that my own teachers insisted on it. We don't receive much training on how to consult. My coworkers say they struggle to teach passive vs. active voice, let alone the rest, in one consultation.
This 2023 essay, “Against the Writing Center,” is worth revisiting in the AI cheating moment.
If undergraduates are taught that writing is just stringing “points” together, regardless of style, of course they think AI can match human ability.
Cleanth Brooks has this habit of using geometry metaphors to illustrate his points about literature. So, looks like my niche was cornered 80 years ago.
I often hear about the work of a critic being too extreme, lacking in qualifications, and insisting upon absurd notions. Then I read the critic and every paragraph is [hedge] [qualifier] [precise definition]. Ironically, this was my experience with Brooks' Heresy of Paraphrase.
@caitninjacat tbh, it's a little demotivating. When 90% of the class gets an A, it's hard to know if I'm really improving or where I really stand (which makes PhD applications extra scary). But assignments aren't really stressful. My effort mostly goes into producing papers and teaching.
LW is so fun bc after the 3 days it takes to get my comment approved, plus the 3 days for someone else's response to be visible, I've completely forgotten that I even said anything.
my professor says we can type single-spaced for all our assignments. i'm gonna cry tears of joy. this feels as good as when my classes permanently made the switch to college-ruled paper.