@arthorjnr1@FlamesOfGod1@Sports_Doctor2 You're just in every comment trying to justify the sharp practice (corruption) that he is talking about. Jsyk your argument is another point entirely and it can be discuss/argued for on its own but it doesn't negate the original poster stance.
@Wizarab10 I want to believe the last question is subconscious as it seems to come from our girls default settings because exposure should have changed that ma'am.
1st Commentator: Spurs has never had 0-0 draw at their home stadium (White Hart Lane)
2nd Commentator: Seriously?
1st: No, I made that up for your amusement.
🤣🤣🤣 What a savage.
#TotEve
@ehimillion@literatuspaul@Chude_ND1 Yes, you lied when you said NTA is better which is far from the truth. I agree that DStv has a clearer picture/video resolution. Overall sltv is better in value for money
@ehimillion@literatuspaul@Chude_ND1 You are just shifting your argument points. It's already been established that it's not as clear as DStv but it's a way better in terms of utilities. Gracias
@ehimillion@literatuspaul@Chude_ND1 Value for money is simply the utility derive in relation to cost.
Yes, the other channels is good too; up to 10 channels for foreign movies and about 8 for locals (African Nolly's), about 6 for cartoon, News channels and what not.
it's way better than those extortionist