@JacobKleinsass3@ImBreckWorsham Wow. You figured it all out. You, sir, are a true genius.
The rest of us are wrong and dumb... but you? You solved the murder - My goodness.
This is where you feel the ridiculous theory falling apart, as you realize the lack of a motive shuts the entire Fed Slop Narrative down...
You're saying Tyler's Motive was clear. You're saying that Tyler woke up one day, and decided to carry out an assassination of Charlie Kirk for reasons he'd never shared with anyone, until after the assassination was carried out. With Tyler having such a strong motive to kill, it should made him a monster in the eyes of those around him... meanwhile his friends and family describe him as anything but...
The case is fake and gay and everyone knows it.
Bro, Tyler is a normal kid... Hinckley was an insane schizophrenic.
Without a motive, there is no assassination by a young Tyler Robinson. It does not happen.
Wives kill their husbands all the time... friends kill friends all the time... when there's a boat load of money at stake and there was A LOT of money at stake with Charlie living or dying. I'm just saying that way more people had motive to kill Charlie, than little old Tyler...
Come on, dude.
@B12Pilgrim18551@AmericaOnlyBro@RealCandaceO I see it as planted evidence of poor quality. A framing. Something the Feds are completely capable of pulling off. As for a motive, I fail to see Reagan's assassin as relevant here. Care to enlighten me on your theory tying Hinckley's motive to Robinson's?
The Fed Slop is exhausting as you continue regugitating moronic explanations.
Tyler Robinson - Zero Motive to kill Charlie
US Federal Gov't & Israel - A massive motive to silence Charlie for his take on war a with Iran and for realizing Israel's crimes against humanity. His massive influence could not continue so they killed him.
Try reading a book and connecting the dots, rather than believe another ridiculous story your lying government is telling you.
@yousteroid15@finedakineglass@papeadex It kinda was. Dude in red was a clear piece of garbage with no regard for other people's lives. Cop saved another innocent person from dying in the future. Kudos to the Cop!!
You think the security detail did a good job that day?
Or a piss poor job?
Serious question.
Because putting Charlie him in a bowl, with countless roof tops surrounding him... should have never happened without secutiy manning roof tops.
Does that level of security demonstrate a well put together detail, or a massive failure? So yeah, I'll dismiss his security detail and their weird behavior as unacceptable and suspect as hell.
I have with a Remington 700 usually running 180-grain Hornady.
And the round has always gone through 100% of the time. I have yet to see anyone re-create a fired 30-06 and it not leave an exit wound. It hasn't been re-created because it would be an extremely rare occurrence. And since it's so rare, I'll never believe it took place with Charlie, when there are dozens of inconsistencies in the Fed Slop narrative. I can't ignore this, the body cam turning off for Bagley... it's just too much...
I'm no less serious than you, thinking it was a 30-06 that hit Charlie. lol
Whether you choose to believe it or not - Evil exists... and Charlie was surrounded by evil - evildoers (including his wife) were taking advantage of him emotionally and financially.
So yeah - this includes the security team that was installed around him - the same team who completely FAILED to keep him safe from multiple snipers nests - the same team who could have easily stuck bullet fragments into his neck during that car ride EMS wasn't allowed to be in, along with 36 feet of gauze. I know - crazy right!?! Almost like a 30-06 not leaving an exit wound. lol
And I don't believe for a second his vertebrae were obliterated and his spinal cord severed. He should have went limp almost immediately with that kind of damage done, and he did not.
Agent Hull would have no clue what entered his neck without forensic testing to see if a spinning bullet entered his neck. And since no EMS was allowed on the scene, bullet fragments could have been forced into Charlie's next... the entire scene was tampered... evidence destroyed.
Why no mention of either the shirt or the neck wound in any written material or posted content? No shirt? No neck wound? Why can't this be documented as collected evidence? Both are SOP when dealing with a homicide - especially this high profile of a case. Not to mention the SUV being cleaned and sold within days... lol... but yeah - it was a 30-06. lol
Not saying I have the answers - I just know it wasn't a 30-06 fired by a harmless patsy named Tyler Robinson.