I'm waiting for some Knotzi to come up with the idea that, instead of continuing the chain split at the current difficulty, they should lower it to 1 and perform a hard fork, once they realize that the BIP110 soft fork will fail
@design_sats@MaxisClub The other developers are Core. Luke only copies and pastes Core code and makes some modifications, that are harmful to Bitcoin and calls it Knots
@philip_dath Because I don't need anyone's permission to send or receive Bitcoin, and a minority of dumb clowns like BIP110 supporters can't destroy the hardest decentralized money on Earth
Wow, would you look at Bitcoin pumping! All because of one heroic BIP110 signaling block. Naturally. I heard the S&P checked the mempool and decided to rally too!
@calibrated_lies @Bobob623 Such “wonderful” art will still be permanently and continuously stored on the BIP110 chain, exactly as Martin Habovštiak demonstrated a few days ago. Your ridiculous BIP110 debate is already finished. Accept it, you stupid dog or fork off
Let's change BTC consensus, not to actually fix spam, but to move it somewhere else. And while we're at it, let's freeze user funds for a year, break a few other things. It's a brilliant idea! Linus would surely be proud of this level of "engineering"
Yes, of course, run BIP110!