@masay256@Re7Labs Not these guys again ๐. AUM: $1bn โ $600m (per their posts). TVL: ~$91m (on-chain). Users impacted by exploit events. Comments currently locked. Risk awards on display.
@BautiDeFi Their latest post blocks replies re transparency and auditability. If the value prop of tokenised funds is on-chain transparency and auditability, a 7x gap between stated AUM and verifiable TVL seems worth addressing. What's in the AUM figure that isn't captured on-chain?
@Re7Labs@ResolvLabs Second exploit-adjacent incident in under a year.
deUSD/USDX in 2025. Resolv/USR today.
Vague PR first, technical details after. Still no dollar figure on actual exposure.
184 markets. Yield-bearing stablecoins keep being the vector.
Same curator. Same asset class. Different day.
@Re7Capital What methodology is Hedgeweek using here? Curated vaults apparently took significant losses from stablecoin collapses, TVL is down, revenue is down sharply from peak. Genuine question โ what am I missing?
@etherlink@Re7Labs If the risk management was institutional-grade, why did curated vaults incur losses for users?
What specifically failed โ underwriting, monitoring, or hedging?
@OrcsSandHive@Re7Labs Buzzword bingo on this one โ coordination layer โ standardization โ scalability โ alignment between capital and execution โ โฆ just need 'ecosystem' and 'synergies' for a full card. What does this mean exactly?
@Delphi_Digital@Re7Labs@Anchorage Where do you get this $1 billion assets under management from ? Just need to go to DefiLlama and see it's a fraction of this.
@lechriss17@MarvinHarryP@Starknet If this is โsimple, real BTC yieldโ, whatโs the downside risk?
How does it behave in a vol regime shift, funding spike or liquidity gap โ especially once looping/leverage is involved?
@WorldOfMercek@Re7Labs@vesuxyz@lechriss17 Why did you block me after shilling mRe7BTC?
I raised legitimate questions about downside risk in a strategy described as โsimpleโ and โrisk freeโ โ which it clearly isnโt.
@lechriss17@Samooves@Starknet Is this strategy capital guaranteed?
If not, how are BTC holders protected against vol spikes, funding stress and liquidation risk โ especially once looping/leverage is involved?
@lechriss17@MarvinHarryP@Starknet If this is โsimple, real BTC yieldโ, whatโs the downside risk?
How does it behave in a vol regime shift, funding spike or liquidity gap โ especially once looping/leverage is involved?
@lechriss17@Samooves@Starknet Is this strategy capital guaranteed?
If not, how are BTC holders protected against vol spikes, funding stress and liquidation risk โ especially once looping/leverage is involved?