@Darcy_Lock@mimibirch cant blame you, though. Some people online (especially on twitter) are genuinely so dumb nowadays that it’s hard to tell what’s sarcasm and what’s a joke.
And a post like this… I genuinely wouldn’t be surprised at all if it wasn’t posted as a joke.
@BadAppleTracy@IMPmurderpros Chaz has more focus shorts than Millie, Verosika and Barbie Wire… viv really isn’t doing herself any favors regarding the stereotype that she prefers male characters over female ones in helluva boss 😭
@MHoehlein@Ninja_Bebado@IMPmurderpros If this is ragebait then it’s gonna backfire. Viv literally went on multi tweet rants about how she cares about the female characters of the show… and then does this. Fakes out a genuinely good female character to give the sexually abusive dead male character a *2ND* short
@QueerEmo_@TADCTurkiyede@glitch_prod Did you even read the tweet? Because this tweet clearly states that a cinema has tried to contact glitch multiple times, and has had been outright ignored by glitch every time.
@hdbsbenansbs@kristianb55@cleary_mitch@7NewsMelbourne@7NewsAdelaide@7AFL Indefinite suspension a bit too harsh but he's not wrong. Fans saying it is one thing, but these kinds of things get taken very seriously, especially if it's coming from a player, and even if it was only said as a joke/sarcastically.
@joe017432831221@_FreoHub Regardless of if he's wrong or not, saying that an injury "saved" a coach is insanely bad taste and makes you look like a massive wanker.
Especially from someone like him.
@TheDoctorAV@OctorokR yeah, except you have to avoid the internet like the plague for 2 weeks to avoid all possible spoilers. There will be people who can't go to the cinemas are 100% going to get their experience ruined because some overexcited person babbled about spoilers.
@Tylin3404@glitch_prod generally when a post starts with "hey guys, unfortunately <insert name here>..." it can mean that that person has passed away.
@ipray2aquinas@BodySwap@glitch_prod 2 weeks after the cinema release, when so many of the fans are already gonna have the experience ruined because they accidentally stumbled into spoilers.
@me0wd0g@BodySwap@glitch_prod the issue for me isn't the fact that it's in cinemas. It's the fact that they chose to release it 2 weeks early. Why not 1-2 days early? This is undoubtedly going to ruin the experience for many fans who get exposed to spoilers unintentionally
@PurpleHerring1@thepistol17 and Jackson too. I remember he didn't play very well in his first couple of games and everyone instantly began saying he was a "waste of money" and a "washed up player"
@adamtarrot@FreoPope Writing about them is one thing, but "looking at the positives" after a 120+ point loss is fucking insane. They're treating it like it's auskick game for 5 year olds and not national level footy
You guys should literally be seeing this as an insult.
@jwilliamcarroll@RonnyLerner Hell nah. I'm probably biased as a Freo fan, you can't look at Alex Pearce's game saving smother and think that's not the win of the round.
@fudoncis@jacksondavey@WineGlassTatt The key word there is "potential". You never apologize if you think you have a chance of getting off.
There's a reason people who get into car crashes are told to never apologize to the other driver. Same here.
The tribunal will definitely treat it as an admission of guilt.
@Billybobjoney@CollinCusce@Dreamfyre43@daily_romania@DiscussingFilm Because it's going directly against the source material of both the books AND the movies, and felt like it was only done for the sole purpose of generating clicks and drama.
I have no doubt that he's a great actor, but he just isn't snape.
@JetMahler@hasumpstuffedup Actually the 50m was the correct decision since the whistle was clearly blown before the tackle.
The mark being paid in the first place was the problem.
@PeaceLillie330@TimSchaeffer8@Extrafriez@Newsforce I mean it's an Occam's razor type thing. If players got into accidents and that warning wasn't there, they could be sued for incentivizing reckless driving/movement.
@BundyBard@Duckimusprime@jkmccrann@CalTwomey but if the player has a shot on goal, wastes the 30 seconds, but then clearly attempts to pass the ball to another player rather than take the shot, it should be an immediate free kick.
@BundyBard@Duckimusprime@jkmccrann@CalTwomey I would change it to insufficient attempt. If a player reasonably has a shot on goal but falls short, a forward should be able to take a mark, it would be unfair to not allow the forwards to try and reclaim the ball via a mark. (1/2)