@Psychologiseren@BrianAtlas The control group for significance testing is the null hypothesis (effect = 0). You don’t need a physical control group. Significance just tests whether the data differ from zero strongly enough
@Psychologiseren@BrianAtlas Not statistically significant does not mean 0. It means a low number that isn't significant. 4.5 times that number is significant
@bryan_johnson Glad to hear you have personalised the dose. The whole 5 grams thing was also based on a lighter person. I need a minimum of 6 grams to get where I'm going.
Good luck dude!
@DKThomp I think a statement about what "everybody" thinks about something is always, literally always doomed to fail.
Its not instruction, its an argument which you are free to disagree with, or agree and still engage in from an informed place.
How can greater awareness be bad?
@turnedfourthing@blingring14@Rainmaker1973 To echo the other comment, but in a different way: the compound we are talking about it the one that likely provides the longevity benefits. You cannot have one without the other
@yepsuzn@DefiantLs You didn't criticise anyone else, just the guy who solved the situation when it went bad. That makes you about equal to that box of rocks Susan
@Cern_Nu_Noss @bryan_johnson As someone with a lot of experience, I say let him do it. Why worry about it? My first dose was 5g. He doesn't need our negative messages
@SydneyLWatson Used to live in Australia. Sydney, Melbourne both have good looking ppl, outside of that it changes. You have better looking ppl than my country (Ireland), but not the best. Many countries in South America beat you
@thedeeptrees@bryan_johnson Being able to handle moderately poisonous substances a few times a week is not the point.
Questioning why you include it at all is.