DON’T LET THIS STORY GET BURIED...
In 2021, CNN anchor Drew Griffin looks Dr. Rashid Buttar in the eye and says:
“I’m vaccinated. You think there is a ticking time bomb in me and I’m going to die?”
Dr. Buttar’s chilling reply:
“I hope not, but I’ll be happy to meet you in three years and see how you’re doing.”
Drew Griffin was diagnosed with cancer shortly after the shot… and died of TURBO CANCER in 2022.
He never made it to that three-year check-in.
This is what happens when warnings are mocked. Millions more are walking time bombs.
🚨 BREAKING: Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announces "folate deficiency in a child's brain can lead to autism."
And an "exciting therapy" for kids with autism: leucovorin. Up to 60% of deficient children can have improved communication if they take it.
GREAT NEWS.
Retired pharma R&D exec: "In animal research... if you need a healthy animal, [they're] never vaccinated"
"Look up Charles River Laboratories or... protocols for animal husbandry in preclinical research, they never vaccinate"
"[Vaccinated animals aren't] considered healthy"
@sasha_latypova@AndrewKaufmanMD
Parents - this site is gold ..
‘Just the Inserts’ has the actual package inserts for vaccines, Vitamin K shots, and more.
No spin, just the official documents with all the warnings, ingredients, and risks listed.
Always read the fine print.
Knowledge is power. 👇🏻
https://t.co/638afL1xKP
SHOCKING: Hospitals were paid massive amounts per COVID patient (see table) .. while deadly protocols turned them into death traps.
Dr. Peter McCullough exposes the truth:
‘Virtually ALL the deaths occurred in the hospital.’
‘Knowing there were almost NO home deaths from COVID is STARTLING.’
The virus didn’t kill most people at home .. the hospital protocols did.
Isolation, Remdesivir, ventilators, and denial of early treatment failed patients.
This is the real COVID death story they don’t want you talking about.
HOW THEY ENGINEERED THE FAKE PANDEMIC
1. China released staged footage of people “dropping dead” in the streets; scenes never witnessed anywhere else in the world before or after December 2019.
2. A PCR test was rolled out that could not determine whether someone was actually sick. The vast majority of results were false positives.
3. The claim of asymptomatic transmission was heavily promoted to justify restrictions on healthy people and to force mass testing on the entire population; which led to tens of millions of false positive test results.
4. Tech companies and media outlets were mobilized to censor dissent and rebrand inconvenient truths as “misinformation.”
5. Behavioral psychologists were brought in to design fear-based messaging specifically intended to secure public compliance.
6. To keep the illusion of a deadly pandemic alive, they required excess mortality data.
7. Ordinary mild respiratory symptoms alone could not produce those numbers, so the population was subjected to sustained psychological pressure capable of triggering mass psychogenic illness.
8. Relentless fear messaging kept cortisol levels chronically elevated, weakening immune function, particularly among the elderly.
9. Social isolation, delayed medical care, and lockdown policies then generated the excess deaths needed to prop up the narrative.
10. Cloth and surgical masks were suddenly declared effective, something no serious public-health authority had previously recommended for ordinary respiratory pathogens, turning every face into a walking advertisement for fear.
11. People were conditioned to remain isolated “until the vaccine was ready,” buying authorities additional time to expand control.
12. Billions were injected with an experimental product that was claimed to stop both infection and transmission.
13. When those claims collapsed, the goalposts were moved: “Your shot won’t work unless the unvaccinated also take it.”
14. New “variants” were announced every few months to justify an endless series of booster campaigns.
15. A new condition - “long COVID” - was introduced to reframe mounting vaccine side effects.
16. Pharmaceutical companies recorded unprecedented profits, shielded by government contracts and complete legal immunity.
17. Anyone who raised objections was silenced, deplatformed, investigated, or publicly discredited.
18. Once the story became too strained to maintain, the pandemic was abruptly declared over, and the entire episode was treated as if it had never happened.
NEVER FORGET AND PROSECUTE FAUCI!
US infant school teacher says her pupils are getting sicker and sicker and it’s due to their multiple ‘vaccinations’.
Why would she risk her career making ‘false claims’ , she has seen the effect on small children in her care with her own eyes.
When will more people speak out ?
1898: Bayer trademarks a new cough medicine for children. They call it Heroin.
1899: they also trademark aspirin. Enjoy that one. It is the last unambiguously good thing on this list.
1900: Heroin is Bayer's best-selling product, marketed to mothers as non-addictive.
1915: they supply the German army over 170 tons of chlorine gas for the trenches.
1925: Bayer folds into a chemical giant called IG Farben.
1940s: IG Farben runs a slave-labour plant at Auschwitz and part-owns the maker of the Zyklon B.
1956: a director convicted of war crimes at Nuremberg is quietly made chairman of Bayer's board.
1980s: Bayer discovers its haemophilia blood product is riddled with HIV.
Rather than destroy the stock, it keeps selling the untreated batches to Asia and Latin America to recoup the money.
Thousands of haemophiliacs are infected. Many die.
2003: the New York Times exposes it. Bayer helps settle for around 600 million dollars.
2018: Bayer buys Monsanto, inheriting Roundup, Agent Orange and PCBs in a single afternoon.
2026: the US Supreme Court throws out the Roundup cancer lawsuits. Bayer wins.
Heroin, chlorine gas, Auschwitz, tainted blood, and a weedkiller in the dock, all from one firm.
Every one of them was legal, marketed with total confidence, and blessed by the experts of its day, and the company behind them is bigger now than it has ever been.
The heroin got recalled. The company never did.
Twins died from SIDS at exactly the same time just 2 HOURS after being vaccinated. 2 hours. Exact the same time.
If vaccines don't cause SIDS, this event is statistically impossible.
https://t.co/HqRTx2aULB
1918: they sold radioactive water as a health tonic. It was radium, and it dissolved men's jaws.
1898: they sold heroin as a children's cough syrup. It was heroin.
1863: they sold cocaine wine as a daily pick-me-up. Popes and presidents put their names to it.
1946: they sold cigarettes on a doctor's recommendation. Whole campaigns ran on which brand physicians preferred.
1960s: they sold margarine as the heart-healthy fat. It was loaded with the trans fat that actually stops hearts.
Every one of these came with an expert's blessing and total confidence.
The people telling you today which fat to fear are the institutional descendants of the ones who put radium in your water and a doctor's face on a cigarette packet.
"The experts recommend it" has a body count going back a century.
Here you are @jsm2334 I've finally worked out how the "modified SCCS" technique to "find a safety signal for SIDS" was adopted by the pharma industry because it was so bad at finding a safety signal for SIDS.
Your data restrictions. Jittered vaccination dates. Death cohorts up to 800. Just as you demanded.
This simulation of 100 iterations of two scenarios failed to have sufficient power to find a signal:
Scenario1⃣: the effect of 1.5x increased risk of death is applied over 5 days.
Scenario2⃣: the effect of 1.5x increased risk of death is applied over 60 days.
In both scenarios the increase is applied as an exponential decline with half lives of 2 days and 15 days respectively.
In both scenarios the background rate of death in vaccinated children is also 10% higher than in unvaccinated children.
Yet none of these scenarios had enough power to detect the safety signal of up to a near 50% overall increase in death rate using the "modified SCCS" method espoused by Farrington (and Jeffrey Morris).
Prof Morris found a way to produce the best figures he could for his simulation - claiming that the method was robust - by adapting his "bins" to the type of simulation he was running. You can't do this in a real study because you don't know when the effect of the vaccine will hit, or how long for. That's why mSCCS doesn't have enough power to do this job.
What needs to happen to address this question is that for every country where SIDS deaths are reported and where vaccinations are administered in the first 6 months of live, every case of SIDS is published along with the dates of their last vaccination.
Then we would get to check the data - not institutions with vested interests and "trust us bro" denials of data availability.
It won't happen, because there is too much at stake.
@stkirsch@MaryanneDemasi@JesslovesMJK@AaronSiriSG@RWMaloneMD@uTobian@RetsefL
Western Australia accidentally conducted one of the world's largest real-world vaccine safety experiments.
From April 2020 until March 2022, Western Australian was isolated from the rest of Australia and the world. Its borders were closed, and for almost two years there was virtually no community transmission of COVID-19.
That makes Western Australia's data unique.
Across 2020 and 2021, a population of around 2.7 million people recorded just 1,223 COVID-19 cases. Some of which were classified as ‘historical cases’, and only around 11% were acquired locally. Most cases were linked to international arrivals, known contacts, or existing cases/clusters.
By the end of 2021, almost 4.1 million COVID-19 vaccine doses had been administered in the state.
According to the Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance Annual Report 2021, the reported adverse event rate for all non-COVID vaccines was 11.1 per 100,000 doses.
For COVID-19 vaccines, it was 264.1 per 100,000 doses.
That is a reported adverse event rate per dose approximately 23.8 times higher than for all other vaccines combined.
Those figures deserve attention.
Western Australia's experience was unlike almost anywhere else on Earth.
Millions of vaccine doses administered in a population with very limited exposure to the virus and a material spike in adverse events.
If we are to learn from history, this data deserves our attention.
If vaccines do not increase risk of sudden death, then why are there death spikes at 2 and 4 months precisely when kids are vaccinated? Baffling isn't it??
Andy Wakefield sits down with @MaryBowdenMD to revisit the MMR fight the medical establishment thought it had buried. Dr. Bowden asks the blunt questions, and Wakefield gives the answers the mainstream medical press won't address.
THE BIG QUESTION IS: whose word counts more? The credentialed experts or the mothers standing in front of the wreckage of their own children?
MARY BOWDEN: "Were you blindsided or tell us about that!?"
ANDY WAKEFIELD: "I was young and naive, I was a surgeon, surgeons think in a particular way which isn't necessarily with the use of their brains most of the time. I just thought the government will find this interesting, this possible link, it would help explain why there's this dramatic upsurge in autism. And if it is the vaccine and something related to age of exposure we could delay it or break them up into single vaccines. I didn't see this issue with the single measles, mumps and rubella, it was when they were combined into one vaccine. And I did the research, I thought if I'm going to get involved in this fight I need to have done the research, I need to understand what's happened. So I read every single paper on safety and efficacy of measles, measles containing vaccines, including single measles, measles, rubella vaccine, different countries, different brands, and I couldn't find the safety studies, the appropriate adequate safety studies."
MARY BOWDEN: "What prompted you to go down this road to begin with?"
ANDY WAKEFIELD: "Mothers calling me and saying my child was fine, he was developing perfectly normal, he had speech and language, interaction with his siblings, and then he lost it. He had an MMR vaccine which just went downhill from that point and was never the same again. Eventually he was diagnosed with autism, and I said stop, you must have got the wrong number, I know nothing about autism, zero, we weren't taught about it at medical school, it was so rare. And so they said no, the reason we're calling you Dr Wakefield is my child has terrible gastrointestinal problems and I believe they're related to their autism. And then I was presented with two conflicting sets of ideas, one from the experts, God save us from experts, Covid has taught us that, and the mothers. Who do you trust?"
"12 years as an ER nurse and every SIDS case had a well visit within 72 hours of their death. Every single one." This MATCHES the real life experience of Paramedic Harry Fisher @harryfisherEMTP who for the last 5 years has been asking that question whenever he gets a SIDS call.
Do you have a child on the spectrum, or are you on it.
Well here you go, a confession that they knew the MMR caused it, and they suppressed that information, then dismissed all the parents who claimed it was the vaccines ?
So the question isn't, why did they do it, that's OBVIOUS, $$$$$..
The Question is why did so many of us, the vast majority, defend these people, and still do?
There will be people attacking this post now, saying it's bullshit and that vaccines saved lives, to which there is so much DATA, your data not ours, showing that this is not the case.
And the saddest thing, it's our children who are used to prove the anti-vaxxers wrong. They are sacrificed to this now disproven belief.
I saw a young man on the train the other day, profoundly autistic, here only in his physicality, the rest of him in that autistic space, unable to demand justice because he is forever lost.
And the stats are rising. And instead of demanding transparency, our new humans will be presented to the nurses, as they celebrate their arrival with the true baptism of our time, a needle. Vitamin K, and Hep B.
So, what do we value more, the long term health of our children, or compliance to the vaccines?
From
Valerie Anne Smith
@ValerieAnne1970
CDC Whistleblower's Secret Recording: "We Buried the Data on MMR & Autism, I'm Completely Ashamed."
Dr. Brian Hooker secretly recorded a senior CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, who made a shocking admission.
On those recordings, Dr. Thompson freely confessed to a massive cover-up.
He admitted that he and his senior associates at the CDC had buried the damning data showing a statistical link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
Thompson stated, "Thimerosal causes autism-like features." He expressed profound shame, saying, "I'm completely ashamed of what I did. The higher-ups wanted to do certain things and I went along with it."
He named senior officials—Colleen Boyle, Frank DeStefano, Marceline Moulton—as participants.
At the helm was Dr. Julie Gerberding, who later became president of Merck Vaccine.
This is not a theory. It is a confession from a lead CDC co-author on the pivotal studies used to deny any link. The man inside the machine admitted the fraud. The public deserves the truth.
The victims deserve justice.
Beware: if you get your child this ‘vaccine’ and they die…you could be charged with murder…
The ‘Vaxelis Vaccine’ is ‘6 Vaccines in 1’ for 6-week-olds…with 6 babies dead in their own trials.
Don't forget how we were conned during the scamdemic!
As the Bayer CEO said:
“mRNA shots are ‘gene therapy’ marketed as ‘vaccines’ to gain public trust.” The definition of ‘vaccine’ was specifically amended to accommodate them.
Who would take an experimental ‘gene therapy’!
Anesthesiologist Heidi Klessig tells @MaryBowdenMD about the moment she began questioning brain death diagnoses. Assigned to a supposedly brain-dead organ donor who was warm, pink, and moving with normal vital signs, she proposes a paralytic and a painkiller but sees no need for anything more.
Her supervising attending disagrees, and the disagreement exposes the contradiction at the heart of organ procurement from "dead" patients.
STAFF ANESTHESIOLOGIST: "What is your anesthetic plan of care?"
HEIDI KLESSIG: "I think I'll give the young man a paralyzing agent so he doesn't move during the surgery and annoy the surgeons. [...] I'm going to give him fentanyl as a potent painkiller to prevent any swings in the blood pressure or heart rate that might damage the organs."
STAFF ANESTHESIOLOGIST: "OK, that sounds reasonable. Are you going to give him a drug to block consciousness?"
HEIDI KLESSIG: "Why would I do that? Isn't he dead?"
STAFF ANESTHESIOLOGIST: "Why don't you give a consciousness blocking drug just in case?"
If the patient were truly dead, no anesthetic for consciousness would ever be necessary. The attending's own caution says otherwise.