So, you want to grow and drive shareholder value?
Over the last 10+ years, I’ve helped CEOs and boards deploy capital across M&A, partnerships, and internal investment to create real enterprise value.
After a certain scale, almost every company will develop a corporate development division. But, you will be surprised on how few "really" understand how corporate development actually drives shareholder value — and which strategies outperform.
In this thread, I unpack the Build vs. Buy vs. Partner framework used by corporate development teams with 20+ years of market data, case studies, and signals every CEO and investor should understand.
Recently came across a deal with misclassified external contractors ..
I’ve sat on the buy-side of M&A for over a decade... Among other things, I've learned that (a) Founders are the engine of our economy, (b) global talent arbitrage is undeniably the most effective lever for extending runway and accessing brilliant engineers, but (c) when a DD team flags a tax risk the best default reaction is to assume the deal structure is broken rather than try to explain it away.
The common startup advice ("Just hire global devs as contractors to save the 10% EOR fee") is a simplistic reaction that panders to the move fast narrative. This sort of advice can be misleading because it ignores the massive liability shift that occurs when a company matures from scrappy startup to acquisition target.
If you want to better understand why deals stall, a good place to start is reading up on successor liability and indemnity escrows, rather than just optimizing your monthly burn rate.
How much EV has been trapped in escrow accounts due to contractor misclassification risks in the last few years?
companies/founders preparing to exit should consider compliance fee to clean up before the DD team starts looking.
@pitdesi Airlines have stopped selling transportation and started selling real estate and the premium market is currently the highest-yielding landlord in the sky.
Paying 15x effectively a SaaS multiple for an accounting practice implies you can convert labor-heavy COGS into compute-heavy COGS. The math works if that 80% reduction is real, but expenses rarely vanish. In my experience they shift.
VC backed roll up firms are also trying to do this, Thrive cap
@BigJohn043 Arbitrage is a financial strategy but integration is an operational discipline. There is a chance some VCs are currently mistaking the former for the latter. Although, some VCs have real chops, I'd say early results are year or two out..