Founder & CEO @myspotlightnews — paywall-free journalism built for college students. Publishers keep 70%. Making local news survive the next generation.
Racism and structural inequality are real. But blaming capitalism for every failure in Philadelphia isn’t a serious policy argument.
Why do some cities outperform Philly in business formation, job creation, and attracting investment under the same economic system?
What specific policies would you change? Working people need better jobs, higher wages, and economic mobility—not just ideological explanations.
What exactly is the “dog whistle” here? Supporting local businesses, investing in startups, reducing bureaucracy, or retaining young talent?
And by “romanticizing grit,” I mean celebrating Philadelphia’s struggles as part of its identity instead of demanding measurable improvements in economic opportunity, public services, and quality of life.
If you disagree, make an actual argument.
You’re conflating access to capital with displacement. Those are different problems. Two of my founding team members are African American, and I want more Black founders to have access to funding, ownership, and opportunity. The solution is expanding access to capital, not opposing investment altogether.
Harsh reality: Philadelphia needs to stop romanticizing grit and start building for growth.
Support businesses. Invest in startups. Cut the red tape. Aggressively recruit and retain young talent.
Grit is part of Philly’s identity. It can’t be the entire economic strategy.
@Api91Test@DPearsonPHL@BRuddTweets “Declining Economic Mobility: Philadelphia ranks 50th among the nation’s 50 largest metropolitan areas for economic mobility, with today’s low-income children earning less than their parents.”
https://t.co/jpGu5oXFbQ
You finally raised a legitimate economic question about ROI, then immediately buried it under childish insults.
For the record, I support scrutinizing incentives, measuring outcomes, and eliminating those that don’t deliver.
You could’ve just asked instead of inventing my position and arguing against it.
Anyway, good night. Enjoy the last word.
Some homework for you:
City Council’s Tax Reform Commission:
https://t.co/rv5SzB6O3s
Greater Philadelphia Growth Partnership:
https://t.co/EuIPCIWnsO
Philadelphia Works:
https://t.co/cXAflDGZeN
Go do some reading and research. Let me know if you have an original insight or something substantive to contribute.
Apologies on the unconditional — poor switching between tasks.
These concerns aren’t unique to me. City Council’s own Tax Reform Commission, Council President Kenyatta Johnson, Mayor Parker, and the Greater Philadelphia Growth Partnership have all called for improving competitiveness, attracting investment, and creating jobs.
These are documented economic challenges, not some personal agenda.
Disagree with the proposals all you want, but dismissing them as “self-serving” doesn’t address the substance.
Some suggested reading: Glaeser’s Triumph of the City, Moretti’s The New Geography of Jobs, Pew’s State of the City, and Center City District’s economic reports.
You might discover that attracting employers, growing the tax base, retaining talent, and competing for investment are actual fields of economic study, not controversial opinions.
Philadelphia deserves serious economic debate. Try arriving prepared for one.
Having incentives doesn’t mean they’re delivering enough results.
Pew found Philadelphia had just 111 businesses per 1,000 adults, compared with 129 nationally and 153 in Denver (2022).
Philadelphia ranked last among 13 cities studied. That’s precisely why I’m advocating for more competitive policies, not celebrating the bare minimum.
Try to do more homework since you’re new to this.
@WPhillyTurkey@Buzzkill_Ed@mr_saltz Before telling someone to do their research, you might want to check Philadelphia’s existing laws.
Chapter 19-3800 already provides qualifying new businesses with a 0% business tax rate for their first two years. The city also offers job creation tax credits.
And there it is. When you run out of substantive arguments, you resort to name-calling.
Publishers voluntarily partner with us, retain 70% of the revenue, and gain access to younger audiences.
You can disagree with our business model. That’s perfectly reasonable. But personal insults aren’t criticism, and cynicism isn’t intelligence.
If you have a serious argument, make it. Otherwise, you’re simply proving my point about the hostility toward entrepreneurship.
Mocking entrepreneurship while contributing absolutely nothing to the conversation is quite the statement.
Philadelphia needs more people willing to build, invest, hire, and take risks. Not more people who mistake cynicism for intelligence.
This mentality isn’t grit. It’s complacency masquerading as civic pride. Muh grit.