Netanyahu has informed Trump that Israel rejects the provision in the deal requiring an immediate and permanent end to the war in Lebanon, telling the president Israel does not consider itself bound by it.
CNN.
NR’s editorial on the MOU:
“State department official John Negroponte made the droll comment after Richard Nixon’s 1972 Christmas bombing campaign in North Vietnam that ‘we bombed them into accepting our concessions.’
A similar verdict seems appropriate for President Trump’s war on Iran.”
https://t.co/XXvRDnH2Kv
@yemisi@CNN_NewsNight And that is why you make your case before going to war. You need to get the people to buy into the fact that there may be short term pain before we reach our objectives.
The next time you hear JD Vance casually accuse his critics of unpatriotically spreading misinformation, remember that he described the *accurate* descriptions of the MOU as Iranian propaganda. He says what he needs to say in the moment without regard for the truth — or decency.
Meanwhile incredible scenes unfolding outside of sofi stadium
Iranians are handing out t shirts with names & faces of protestors murdered by the Islamic regime on January 8-9
The IRGC wont be allowed to wash the blood of these youth through sports
BREAKING: Tehran Mayor Ali Reza Zakani just said the quiet part out loud.
“Our war with America continues and does not end with the memorandum of understanding. Our war with America is an existential war.”
Evil Republicans are not coming after your Social Security (please retire this lazy, stale scare tactic).
*Math* is coming after your Social Security - its scheduled for a 22% cut in 6 years when the trust fund hits zero. So where is your plan to bring solvency, Senator?
The President of the United States beat Iran in battle and has surrendered at the negotiating table. In the words of Donald Trump, "Iran has never won a war and Iran has never lost a negotiation." https://t.co/KQi89qLviM
McDonald's announced they're replacing cashiers with kiosks in California just after the $20 minimum wage kicked in. Shocking to absolutely no one who understands basic economics. When you artificially price labor above its market value, employers find substitutes. Machines, automation, or they simply eliminate positions entirely.
The teenagers who desperately need that first job experience? Gone. The single mother trying to re-enter the workforce after years away? Priced out by someone with more skills. You've just created a legal barrier that prevents the least skilled workers from competing on the one thing they had going for them: willingness to work for less while they build experience.
Politicians pat themselves on the back for "helping workers" while unemployment among young minorities hits double digits. The workers who keep their jobs benefit (temporarily), but the invisible victims, those who never get hired in the first place, don't make headlines. Economics doesn't care about your good intentions.