Teeth go Grey

[Guy Rowland @guyrowlanduk]

RELEASED: The BOTCHED Trials of Lucy Letby

It was one of the longest criminal trials in British history. Reporting restrictions meant that nothing could be challenged about what was said in court.

It’s time to lift the lid. (1/4)

https://t.co/7r5Vmx7hKC

[The Jالی Contrarian @ContrarianJolly]

Why is @ccrcupdate taking so long to act on Ms. Letby’s case?
Perhaps not because it is unsure it was a miscarriage—that’s obvious—but, to the contrary, because it so obviously is, and it knows the political consequences of setting off the review will be explosive.

[Nicky @redrosesgrow]

Is this a joke? So:

1. Lucy Letby offers to cooperate with Cheshire police and make herself available for questioning =manipulation and control.

2. She writes sympathy cards to parents= perverse enjoyment from watching them suffer.

3. A handful of Facebook searches of the parents in amongst thousands of others = sinister, obsessive stalking behaviour.

4. 21 relevant handover sheets in amongst 257 other non related sheets means she was keeping trophies of her victims.

5: Her frozen shock on being arrested = calm, calculated behaviour.

6.Answering questions truthfully = back to manipulate and control.

7. Eventually no comment in her final interview after being asked the same questions over and over again: evasive and dishonest.

It’s almost like you can make anything out of anything in this case.

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@amandaknox @Support Reported

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @DamionT10000533 @sergeantdixie As I said. You’re a tenacious bunch. Dogmatic and pigheaded, but tenacious. 👍

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@DamionT10000533 @GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Yes, I shouldn’t really engage. Anyone who just disregards all the new information is devoid of critical thinking. Bit of an odd hill to die on this one. 😆

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie 👍

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Fine. Let's accept your definition for a moment.

If Hammond and Morris both publicly invited experts who supported the prosecution case to come forward - and none did ... who exactly do you think Morris should have "contacted" directly beyond the existing trial experts?

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie A public appeal is plainly an attempt to reach a target audience. Your objection now remains that it wasn’t an individual approach, which is a different criticism from your original one. So we’re back to debating your personal definition of “contact”

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Yes, but it’s only relevant if your definition of making contact is on an individual basis.

Either way, in the grand scheme I don’t see any new experts speaking out for the prosecution, contacted or otherwise. So it’s moot to the wider direction of travel. It’s nitpicking.

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Yes. In this case, responding to an invitation. My question to you was: how was that invitation communicated? Unless you know the answer, you're still assuming there was no attempt to contact anyone - based on your definition.

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Do you know how he offered the opportunity?

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Then we're back to the same point. He says he offered experts the opportunity to participate. You assert that isn't an attempt to contact them, despite not actually knowing the medium. So you've offered nothing beyond assumptions and your own preferred definition.👍

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie I won't get drawn into dictionary tennis. Your criticism has effectively shifted from 'he didn't try to contact anyone' to 'he didn't contact them individually', which is still an assumption on your part.

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Your claim was that he didn't "try" to "contact" supporters of the prosecution. He states he "offered the opportunity" to experts. We don't know by what medium, so you're making assumptions. Regardless, "contact" simply means attempting to communicate.

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@peternhayes hear hear!

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Where did I misquote you? You say "he didn't actually try to contact anyone who supported the case". He states he offered an interview opportunity to any expert believing the evidence was sound. Anything else is really semantics.

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie Ah, the classic resort to ad hominem.

⭐️

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@GarrickKingston @sergeantdixie More cryptic “riddle me this” replies Garrick. Is this your only remaining ammunition? I’ll give you credit, in a war of attrition, you lot are a tenacious bunch 👍

[Teeth go Grey @Teeth_go_Grey]

@sergeantdixie @GarrickKingston Garrick’s post wasn’t about whether experts who support the conviction exist. It’s whether any chose to participate in the book after Chris offered. But I’ll say again if experts won’t now publicly support the case, that’s telling.