Interesting observation, but “100%” is a bold conclusion from a very specific client demographic. Having an assistant make an inquiry tells us more about someone's lifestyle than their romantic intentions. And to be very honest there's nothing inherently wrong with age-gap relationships between consenting adults. The real question isn't whether a 50-year-old wants to date a 25-year-old, but whether the interest is mutual.
Matchmaking industry ball knowledge: whenever a guy has his assistant inquire about services vs contacting me himself, literally 100% of the time it’s because he’s 50+ and wants to date 25 year olds 🫠
The irony is that the data actually contradicts your conclusion. Receiving 50% of likes doesn't mean the remaining 75% of women are ignored; they receive the other 50%. Meanwhile, the top 15% of men receive half of all likes directed at men, suggesting an even greater concentration of attention.
Both genders clearly have preferences, but there's a difference between having preferences and being equally selective. More importantly, the distribution of likes is not the same as the percentage of people being rejected or ignored.
If we're going to use statistics to challenge gender narratives, we should at least interpret those statistics correctly.
Men complain all the time about how women are only swiping right on the "top" percentage of men, ignoring everyone else.
Well, the data shows the men do the same thing.
Men swipe right primarily on the top 25% of women, statistically meaning ignoring 75% to women's 85%.
Declining birth rates are not simply a matter of couples having less sex. They reflect deeper societal challenges: economic uncertainty, delayed marriages, rising living costs, changing relationship dynamics, and reproductive health concerns. While the frequency of intimacy matters for conception, we must address the conditions that make young people hesitant to start families. You cannot expect population growth in a society where building a stable family increasingly feels like a financial and emotional burden.
Sadly I don't see this trend swinging the other way going forward except the third world countries of course.
#FertilityCrisis #DecliningBirthRates #FamilyPlanning #DemographicTrends
🇨🇿 Czech urologist: “We’ve already lost the fight for the birth rate.”
Urologist Viktor Vik says the drop in Czech fertility comes down to two things: people starting families later, and a clear decline in sexual activity.
Young men are having less sex and finding partners later. Couples coming in with fertility issues sometimes only have sex twice a month; the odds of conceiving naturally are low.
This is deeply troubling, but I strongly believe it deserves more than simplistic explanations.
Economic prosperity doesn't automatically translate into psychological well-being. We need to examine mental health, social isolation, ageing and access to support. A society's progress should also be measured by how well it protects its most vulnerable.
Stealing 'misogyny with a Wi-Fi connection' for future reference. Meanwhile women run entire creative industries he could only dream of. Power vibes only!
@3urop3R3n3w@jackneel I don't know where you're going with this but women offer far more indispensable use to our society that just being a human production machine, and this is also applicable to men.
Imagine being so intellectually bankrupt that you mistake artificial wombs for evidence that women are becoming obsolete.
By that logic, sperm banks should have made men irrelevant decades ago. Technology can replace biological functions, but confusing that with replacing human beings isn't scientific reasoning. It's misogyny with a Wi-Fi connection.
Andrew Wilson Predicts That Women Will Become Obsolete
“If you no longer needed women for reproduction, why wouldn’t we select them out of the gene pool?”
What you're still not getting is that women offer far more substance and an indispensable duty in the development of mankind.... It's not only about the scientific innovation but in other aspect of life.
I'm sure you didn't know that the competitive nature of men is as a result of wanting to be the best of men for women to choose, it's an evolutionary thing and evolution doesn't care about your emotions bro
@Mr_Axel_Gear Like you got the full drift....
I love women so much and I don't see how they can be useless to humankind cause if a scientific innovation
Some men will talk about selecting women out of the gene pool and then be homophobia and claim to be straight.
Buddy you don’t like women and that’s okay. you don’t need to make it your entire personality
Lol, resulting to insult after your irrational opinion/perspective was made obvious to you yourself is a weaker way to accept defeat bro.
I made a biological argument, and your strongest counterargument was a school bus. 😂 I see critical thinking wasn't something you can relate with.
I don't know why people find it so difficult to accept that men generally have a higher sex drive than women. It's biology, not some grand conspiracy.
Even male peacocks are out here putting on fashion shows just to get female attention. Of course, having a stronger sex drive doesn't mean you can't control yourself, but pretending these biological differences don't exist is just ridiculous.
@AjayKan95353719 Keeping a premature lamb alive in a bio-bag isn't the same as creating human life.
Even if artificial wombs become reality, how exactly does that make women obsolete? Science has advanced, but your logic hasn't.
So if I should get you well.... what you saying is men's superiority is their ability to use physical force? 😂 This is so funny man, obviously you've abandoned intellectual reasoning and arrived at caveman philosophy. If brute strength determined human worth, gorillas would be running civilization.
Claiming women depend on men for their existence while men don't depend on women is a spectacular way to forget how every man arrived on this planet. 😂 Humanity literally exists through biological cooperation between both sexes. Imagine mistaking mutual dependence for male superiority and calling it intellectual reasoning.
America now has presidential announcements with VIP access. 😂 For $100,000 a month, Wall Street gets a head start on market-moving statements while ordinary investors are left playing catch-up. When information from the highest public office becomes a premium subscription service, that's not capitalism at its finest; that's a conflict of interest wearing a business suit.
Quite shameful for a supposed matured and leading democratic country pushing for global free press advocacy 💀
Exclusive: Truth Social, the social media platform founded by President Trump, has signed up news and data provider Bloomberg and two Wall Street firms for faster access to the president’s posts, which it sells for up to $100,000 a month https://t.co/W50b4rpj9E