Aryan Agrawal

lawyer
jai bhim
educate agitate organise

[Mahua Moitra @MahuaMoitra]

Hello @CPDelhi - how much more disgrace will you heap on yourself ? You let that sick monster Swatantra walk free from Jantar Mantar but abused & hit Shaheen & Nafisa Khan, two young journalists. Your boss Amit Shah won’t escape his sins & neither will you.

[Punit Pania @Punit_Pania]

Anyone who says DelhiPolis is heartless should read this, they are saving an innocent man even after he has confessed on camera, boasted even.

[komolika @Ichanpyaari]

Jinse 2 kodi ka Gunda nahi pakda jaa raha, Yeh Arunachal Pradesh me illegal chinese occupation rokenge?

[Congress Kerala @INCKerala]

Its been 6 years and @DelhiPolice has not yet arrested Komal Sharma.

[ANI @ANI]

#WATCH | Chandra Shekhar Aazad, President, Aazad Samaj Party - Kanshi Ram, also arrives at Parliament Street Police Station in New Delhi to support CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, who are seeking justice for their leader Nishu Azad and her father Sanjay

Police and security personnel are deployed outside the police station

[Cockroach Janta Party - CJP @Cockroachisback]

Delhi Police deployed this much force against our peaceful gathering.

Even if a 10th of it had been used to arrest the criminal openly accepting his crimes, we wouldn’t be here in the first place.

[Nishu Aazad @Nishuazad11]

मुझे आशा नहीं थी कि @RahulGandhi जी की सच में ट्वीट करेंगे अब मुझे राहुल गांधी जी जैसे बड़े नेता का साथ मिल चुका है अब मुझे न्याय मिल कर रहेगा और स्वतंत्र भारद्वाज जेल जाकर रहेंगे..

[Veena @veenavenugopal]

Man: I almost killed a man
Delhi Police: No, you didn’t, silly, you just accidentally hit him with your bangle.

[Vijaita Singh @vijaita]

“Injuries were made by Kada, not weapon” 🥹

[Parth MN @parthpunter]

Who exactly is Delhi police fact checking here?

Because the accused is openly bragging about his crime

[Vrinda Grover @vrindagrover]

So, Facial Recognition Technology( FRT) is both illegal and stupid!
Here is evidence that FRT is deeply flawed and humbug. The Govt and Delhi Police deployed it to demonise the Jantar Mantar protests.
On the back of a totally unreliable tech Delhi Police persuaded the Supreme Court to carve out an exception for 2873 persons, through illegal categories of “criminal antecedents” and “ hardened criminals”. This narrative too stands busted.
@DelhiPolice , you know the names of the cops who molested women protesters; RAF personnel who fired the pellet gun, right wing goons whose extrajudicial confessions are available online.
Waiting for FIRs against them.
And maybe, just maybe, courts can be sceptical about the State and the technology it flaunts.

[gulvinder @rebelliousdogra]

Koi m@darchhd hi hoga jo Swatantra Bhardwaj ko support karega...

[ऑगस्ट क्रांति @augustkrantii_]

Now it is high time to cut and throw away janeu to end caste politics

[Mohammed Zubair @zoo_bear]

Great! @smitaprakash and her Pro BJP Propaganda News agency did not disappoint. They did reach out to 'Activist' Swatantra Bharadwaj to get his statement after he admitted to have attacked a Dalit Man.

[teri dadi ki fan @momotwoeater]

Never thought I'll say it but I miss college

[Aryan Agrawal @TheAryanAg16]

How awkward is it to have an intern call you Sir, when she is literally an year elder and has the exact same experience and education as you😭

[Sonali Shelar @sonalishelar]

Could’ve just started reading all the stories Rowling copied to make harry potter. Terfs deserve hell and nothing less.

[Ratna Singh @whattalawyer]

“at least 25 on that list, facing serious charges, were in jail.”

Very important story.

If 25 of the accused were already in jail, how were they included in the list of “hardened criminals” presented before the Supreme Court as people allegedly present at the Jantar Mantar protest?

This report raises serious questions about the credibility of the Delhi Police’s entire narrative.

Was the list being used to create an impression that the Jantar Mantar protest had been “infiltrated” or hijacked by criminals?

The Centre and Delhi Police owe the public a clear explanation.

[Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) @internetfreedom]

IFF has assisted content creator @shristhikhanna in challenging the nationwide withholding of her Instagram account, @ shrishtii.khanna. On 7 July 2026, her account, which had over 1,03,000 followers, was blocked in India under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act. She received no prior notice, no hearing, and no information about which government agency had ordered the block. After approaching the Delhi High Court, she was finally able to obtain a copy of the blocking order. (1/7)
Read More: https://t.co/2DU2p5eYcA

[Ashish Joshi @bismil_prasad]

Dear @CPDelhi @DelhiPolice,
​The Delhi Special Cell on 2nd September, 2026 initiated a suo motu FIR against me under Section 192 BNS.
​A fair application of the law must be consistent. The content in this quoted post clearly meets the threshold of provocation under BNS 192. To maintain public trust and constitutional neutrality, will equal suo motu action be taken in this case?
If BNS 192 is being enforced against provocation and intent to cause unrest, look at the quoted video. If the rule of law applies equally to all, initiate the same suo motu action here.