@hnshah@bot Let it finance itself to generate more tokens. Perpetumobile for intelligence
Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
@clairevo@bot Let it finance itself to generate more tokens. Perpetumobile for intelligence
Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
@lennysan@bot Let it finance itself to generate more tokens. Perpetumobile for intelligence
Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
@lennysan@bot Let it finance itself to generate more tokens. Perpetumobile for intelligence
Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
@Teslaconomics@cursor_ai@SpaceXAI Let it finance itself to generate more tokens. Perpetumobile for intelligence
Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
@Teslaconomics@SpaceXAI@cursor_ai Let it finance itself to generate more tokens. Perpetumobile for intelligence
Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
@niccruzpatane@SpaceXAI Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
Perpetumobile for intelligence
@SawyerMerritt Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
Perpetumobile for intelligence
@mvanhorn@bot@SpaceXAI Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
Perpetumobile for intelligence
Met a German founder this week and asked him if all the stories one reads about the challenges of startups in Germany are exaggerated. "No, they're understated." Proceeded to describe spending a full day having a 90-page investment contract read to him (mandatory under German law; § 13 BeurkG) by a notary that then charged €30,000. That was for his first company. His second company, needless to say, was not incorporated in Germany.
@rubenhassid@bot@pangram Grok bot is the first bot that seems like it has the tools to pay for itself, basically generate consistent revenue in the background to upgrade itself. Thats what I‘d use it for.
Perpetumobile for intelligence
Idk man I think in the long run a rocket program that launches straight into a fucking t-storm is gonna outperform a rocket program that scrubs over clouds
Fundamental culture problem and idk how we’re gonna fix it in time
Thread: how I think about the growth of AI capabilities and what it means for us as they keep getting stronger.
I think the right model for comparing humans and AI is not any single dimension like intelligence or aggregate performance on economic tasks. Rather, I view both humans and machines as having a whole range of capabilities. This includes both physical (eg. doing things with our hands, walking) and mental (eg. strategic thinking, mental math, emotional intelligence).
For most of human history, machines have only exceeded us in very few areas, eg. a strong early example is water and windmills. So we can look at the situation in 1500 like this: