I spoke to Retired Subedar Shyam Kishor Agnihotri - father of Major Gaurav Agnihotri, Ex-Husband of Praneeta, daughter of Retired Judge Gyanendra Sharma who has been in news for grand welcome of his daughter post divorce
This is what Shyam Kishore Ji told me - Our family has been subjected to immense ridicule by this social media spectacle. We are in tears listening to the lies being spread against us. It was Praneeta and her family who dominated us throughout this marriage. We treated her like a daughter but they had some different plans.
This marriage was totally without dowry & differences started from the day of marriage itself. They wanted everything their way. Within a year of marriage they filed a false case against all of us and Gyanendra Sharma used to threaten all of us of sending us behind bars. They got a fake medical certificate made in 25000 rupees.
My son then wrote to Chief Justice of Uttarakhand after which an inquiry was initiated and when it was found that Mr. Sharma has misused his powers, he was asked to either resign or settle this matter. When he saw things are going against him Praneeta came back.
Whenever we used to visit our son, she fought with us and did not want us around. I still adjusted with everything thinking of my son's future.
Amidst all this, Praneeta's brother was hospitalised after an accident. My son stayed in the hospital for days taking care of him but these people have no regard. He expired later.
Last year, Praneeta gave birth to a son. We were all so happy. But the day our grandson was born, Praneeta's mother started claiming her son has come back. We could hardly be with our grandson. Then one day they declared that they're doing mundan of the child and we complained that it is our right to get that done at his paternal family. They started fighting and immediately asked for Divorce. My son did not want a divorce but we were also tired. So we agreed.
They're claiming they haven't taken maintenance or alimony. I transferred 3 bighas of my land in my daughter-in-law's name. They have kept car of my son. Our jewellery worth 55-60 lacs is with her. We never refused to give maintenance.
They have taken divorce because they don't want us to have any presence in the life of our grandson. They have cut us off completely. My son was told to agree for divorce forgetting even visitation rights.
We agreed to their demands thinking if this brings peace then let it be - but we were wrong to have trusted them. They have violated the consent terms of the mutual consent divorce and my family is being shamed all over India now. My wife can't stop crying because of this humiliation. My son doesn't know how to deal with his photos and his unit details being spread all over social media.
Her name is Anju Devi.
She is the mother of Atul Subhash.
After her son died on December 9 2024 she had one request.
Let me see my grandson.
His name is Vyom Modi. He is 5 years old.
She went to the Supreme Court.
The court told her she was a stranger to the child.
She had last met her grandson when he was 2.5 years old.
Nikita Singhania had kept the child’s location hidden for weeks after Atul’s death.
The child was found in a boarding school in Faridabad Haryana.
The Supreme Court gave custody to Nikita.
The criminal case against Nikita has been adjourned to November 2026.
Anju Devi’s son is gone.
Her grandson is with the woman accused of abetting his death.
She has no legal right to demand visitation.
In India grandparents have zero legal right to meet their grandchildren.
No law. No provision. No recourse.
India has laws for everything.
It has nothing for a grandmother’s grief.
Her name is Anju Devi.
She is the mother of Atul Subhash.
After her son died on December 9 2024 she had one request.
Let me see my grandson.
His name is Vyom Modi. He is 5 years old.
She went to the Supreme Court.
The court told her she was a stranger to the child.
She had last met her grandson when he was 2.5 years old.
Nikita Singhania had kept the child’s location hidden for weeks after Atul’s death.
The child was found in a boarding school in Faridabad Haryana.
The Supreme Court gave custody to Nikita.
The criminal case against Nikita has been adjourned to November 2026.
Anju Devi’s son is gone.
Her grandson is with the woman accused of abetting his death.
She has no legal right to demand visitation.
In India grandparents have zero legal right to meet their grandchildren.
No law. No provision. No recourse.
India has laws for everything.
It has nothing for a grandmother’s grief.
December 9 2024.
Before he died he wrote one line that became a warning.
If justice is denied throw my ashes in the gutter outside the court.
16 months later.
Nikita Singhania is on bail. She has custody of their son.
His mother went to the Supreme Court asking for her grandson.
The court told her she was a stranger to the child.
The criminal case against Nikita was listed for hearing in November 2025.
The judge was on leave that day.
The case has been adjourned to November 20 2026.
One full year.
Because the judge was on leave.
Atul Subhash’s case. November 2026.
Rita Kaushik who he named in his suicide note is now a District Judge.
His son is 5 years old and growing up with the woman Atul blamed for his death.
His ashes are still waiting.
Another dowry case where a husband and his parents had to run to the High Court just to stop criminal proceedings against them.
The court questioned whether dancing in pubs or wearing revealing clothes can define a woman’s character — but the bigger question remains: why must men first face arrest, stigma, and years of litigation before truth even enters the courtroom?
India’s matrimonial laws still presume the man guilty first, forcing thousands of husbands to prove their innocence after the damage is already done.
Read More:👇
https://t.co/2o7isHg8cF
#DowryLaw #498A #MisuseOfLaws #MensRights #JusticeForMen #LegalReform #FalseCases #GenderNeutralLaws #IndianJudiciary #FamilyLaw #CourtroomReality #LegalNews #MensRightsActivist
@SamSiff There should be mass protest against a few such partial elements who use harassment to extort money from tax payers. Use votes sensibly, Organise and Agitate like Ambedkar said.
Ajit Agarkar & Gautam Gambhir are trying their level best to destroy Indian Cricket now, seleting team purily based on likes, dislikes & hatred:
- Rinku Singh with 40+ avg & 160+ sr is dropped from T20Is now,
- Shubman Gill with worse stats is selected over Jaiswal & Gaikwad,
- Dropping Rinku Singh to make way for Washington Sundar, I mean Sundar's 1 knock in Aus made him better than Rinku?,
- How Shubman Gill is still in T20I team over deserving candidates? Since Asia Cup, Gill has not even scored a 50.
In this case, I am giving my legal advice. The husband is an NRI, and his wife has filed a #498A case against him and his family. The husband’s side approached the High Court seeking quashing. The judge initially kept giving dates and eventually directed the State Police to file their response. The police submitted a reply that is nothing more than a cut-copy-paste of the woman’s FIR. In their response, the State Police claim that the husband and his parents assaulted the wife abroad and demanded dowry. However, the fact is that the husband’s parents have never left the country in their entire lives. When this absurd claim was exposed, the judge issued a notice to the wife and asked her to present her side.
Question: So whose side was the State Police actually representing?
The judge is unnecessarily dragging a baseless case. That is why I advised the husband to have this matter dismissed from this judge’s court. We will directly challenge it in the Supreme Court.
You can still fight one-sided laws, but fighting a one-sided and anti-male mindset is extremely difficult.
@Niva_Bupa pathetic services rendered to a senior citizen who has been paying premiums for many years claiming doctors were wrong. Provide insurance not a ponzi scheme. #irdai@NivaBupaSupport
A top #IAS officer has issued a hard-hitting official letter warning about the massive misuse of #women -centric laws — saying it has shaken men’s faith in the institution of #marriage
The Supreme Court acquitted a man accused of #cruelty and #dowry harassment after 26 years, warning that Section 498A IPC and Dowry laws are being “maliciously misused” to target innocent husbands and families without proof.
Read More:👇
https://t.co/WwYUNsg1Q4