@mattvanswol The problem is that they don’t know better. They operate along an entirely different moral standard.
Subjective morality can change on a whim, and almost always changes to make the subject feel like they are the hero doing good.
I know, I used to be there.
@martinez_clips Feminism says that women are oppressed.
Woke says that being woman is a choice.
Together, the implication is that women were oppressed because of their choice to to identify as a woman.
So women are oppressed, because of their choice.
So they should just choose not to be.
@cocaracha@FL_Kingsnake@CBHeresy Comparing a country with a continent seems a similar offense to comparing a state with a country,
yet you criticize the latter while committing the former.
Seems that you either contradict your own standards, or are implying that you yourself are also uneducated.
@WallStreetApes Not everything inflates at the same rate.
What if all fruit inflated by over 100%?
What if labor (due to something like minimum wage laws taking effect) inflated over 100%?
What if there is less demand and thus less economy of scale, causing prices to rise?
@RadioGenoa At the heart of progressive modernism
is a belief that human nature does not inherently contain some inherent evil,
and that human nature can simply be rehabilitated to be perfectly good.
Opposing views accept human nature has inherent good, but also evil that must be mitigated.
*META'S MAY LAYOFFS EXPECTED TO HIT ABOUT 10% OF WORKFORCE: RTRS
*META TARGETS MAY 20 FOR FIRST WAVE OF LAYOFFS: REUTERS
*META IS PLANNING ADDITIONAL FIRM-WIDE CUTS LATER IN 2026: RTRS
@fatchumlee666@Jv1i3n_ Otherwise, everything is “sexist” or “chauvinistic,” simply because you say it is (I.e. assert that it is).
This is a problem in society right now, as few create sound argument for why those terms are truly met.
@fatchumlee666@Jv1i3n_ Again, you are only asserting it, not supporting the assertion.
To judge by the standards that you judge, you’d have to look it up, and then show how it matches the definition.
This would be supporting your assertion, otherwise it just us both repeating that we are right.