YOU CANNOT BE AN ANTI AND LIKE PROBLEMATIC MEDIAS SUCH AS SUPER SONICO AND NEKOPARA, IT JUST DOESNT WORK LIKE THATTTTTTT IT JUST DOESNT WORK LIKE THATTTTTTTT
Its a complete non-issue
Its also funny how ppl who are obsessed with segregating bathrooms apparently don’t care at all that male pedophiles are in the same bathroom as little boys lol
Humans spent centuries writing books, essays, articles, and research papers.
Then we used all that human writing to train AI systems to write like humans.
Then we built another AI system to inspect the writing and say, “This looks AI suspiciously.”
So now we have one machine trained on humans to sound human, and another machine trained on humans to figure out whether the first machine sounds a little too human.
And after all that, a stressed human still has to make the final call.
Ai-generated artwork officially is ineligible for copyright protection as the US Supreme Court declined to review a appeal case.
The court rules that artwork needs to have a human creator in order to be eligible.
(Source: https://t.co/WnYEKs7IcB)
It has come to our attention that California and Colorado are attempting to force age verification at the Operating System level. As we are not in California or Colorado and use Linux, this won't immediately or directly affect us. However... Fuck you Cali and Colorado. Genuinely.
All who approved of this law should have there tounge cut out. A truly barbaric medieval punishment is needed for this level of Lunacy. This isn't about protecting children. It is about government surveillance and it will only get worse.
My government is trying to force software developers to implement age verification into operating systems.
In California, this becomes law in Jan 2027.
Maybe my calling in life is to help others break the law by keeping that code out of the operating systems.
It is not the place of our government to determine who gets access to any type of computing device.
The Presumption of Guilt on YouTube
Every wrongly terminated creator shares the same story:
One lost their channel for being "linked" to an account they never knew existed.
Another was banned for "ban evasion" despite having only one account ever.
A third was terminated for "spam" on an empty profile used only to watch videos.
They all said the same thing:
"I didn't do what you're accusing me of."
YouTube's response?
No evidence. No explanation. Just "the decision stands."
This isn't moderation.
This is presumption of guilt.
Creators are treated as criminals, not partners.
Execution first, trial never.
In any court, you're innocent until proven guilty.
On YouTube, you're guilty until viral on X.
RT if you believe creators deserve better.
#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators
@BernieSanders The U.S. made a different decision. turn sickness into an industry, turn patients into customers, turn emergencies into invoices.
That’s why people abroad don’t fear getting cancer but Americans fear calling an ambulance.
One of many problems Charlie Kirk made significantly worse was convincing some of the least intelligent/thoughtful/qualified students that they could just say "well the bible says" -- then proceed to misquote or not even cite the bible -- and get out of doing their homework.
Or lab assistant has gotten his Twitter account hacked. If you see any odd activity from @samcon30 this is why. He is currently in contact with X-support.