TaG_SteR

[PunishedTOM @to48864]

Giving women political power is failing a massive shit test, and they will reward you by using that power to ruin the lives of everyone who failed the test. A female politician uses whatever rhetoric is available to say:

"I am a bad girl, I've been a bad girl, and I will get worse until someone comes along, spanks me, tells me to cut it out, and sends me to my room."

Every time, no exceptions.

You think I'm trying to be edgy, or make a joke, but this is cold political theoretic analysis. Just as every time you see "Anti Racist" you can change it to "Anti White" and the statement, sentiment, policy, or regulation is not changed in meaning or intent, so too you can code switch anything a female politician says to:

"Yeah, I fucked it up, what are you going to do to punish me?" or,

"A real man wouldn't tolerate my behavior" or,

"Why won't someone stop me from doing this very bad thing‽"

Try it. It's honestly horrifying and hilarious. From dog catcher to mayor to MP to President (lol, lmao), the messaging is remarkably consistent.

Female politicians challenged European men to tell them to shut up and make sandwiches. European men declined. So they opened the borders and started mass importing rapists and molesters who would tell them to shut up and make sandwiches.

America is in the same quandary. Because we're simple, because we believe words have specific meanings, we foolishly listen to foidspeak and ignore what foids do. You can go down your list of pet females, hoot & holler about this based statement or that based policy, but every time, every single time, they will betray you for making the mistake of failing their shit test.

Until we are quit of this terrible behavior, we will be constantly stymied and betrayed by these busybody shrews, karens, and sluts.

Love your wives. Raise your daughters right. Cherish your mothers and grandmothers.

But don't fucking support political quim.

[Nina Varsavsky @ninavars]

Son feministas hasta que Bad Bunny les baila pegado.

Son socialistas hasta que descubren lo cómoda que es volar en primera clase.

Son ecologistas hasta que toca un fin de semana en yate o un vuelo a las Maldivas.

Son tolerantes hasta que se enteran de que votas a la derecha.

Son pacifistas hasta que alguien discrepa de ellos.

Son partidarios de la libertad de expresión hasta que escuchan algo que no les gusta.

Son antielitistas hasta que los invitan a un reservado VIP.

Son ciudadanos del mundo hasta que les toca tenerlos de vecino.

Son partidarios de repartir la riqueza hasta que les toca repartir la suya.

[DannyCanTalk 🌈 @dannycantalk]

I do not want a walkable city. I do not want trains. I do not want busses.

I want a car that can take me anywhere I want at any time.

I don't want to be dependent on transit schedules.

I want to choose who I'm traveling with, rather than going for luck of the draw.

I want to be able to control my own climate while traveling.

I want to be guaranteed a comfortable seat.

I want somewhere to keep my things during a day out instead of having to carry everything with me.

I want to buy and take home loads of groceries too big to carry without having to trouble myself with delivery services.

I want to go through drive thrus.

I want to be halfway home from work and impulsively decide to go to a restaurant on the other side of town and just change direction immediately.

I want to drive around a new city to take in more than I could on foot or on a fixed route.

I want to do road trips where we make up our journey as we go.

I want to explore my own city at will without any particular plan.

I want to visit small towns out of reach of even the most expansive proposed public transit systems.

Essentially, I want freedom.

[Nick Davidov @Nick_Davidov]

The socialism vs capitalism debate is mostly a question of who you trust more with capital allocation:
- People risking their own money
- Politicians spending yours

A few sub-questions:
- Do you think capitalists or politicians allocate resources better?
- Do you think the pie is fixed, or can the pie grow?
- Do you think more regulation increases freedom, or suppresses it?

To be fair, free-range capitalism can absolutely become the Greed Olympics. Even capitalist systems need courts, laws, property rights, zoning, monetary policy, etc.
But when government over-regulates, everyone can lose.

Example: a sunny town called Freedopolis elects a new mayor who runs on cheaper rent and stronger tenant protections. There are more tenants than landlords, so he wins in a landslide.
He passes rent control. Landlords can’t raise rent much, and evicting someone for not paying takes a year.
Immediately, landlords don’t want to risk it and become insanely picky. They require huge deposits, perfect credit, stable employment, references, a clean background check, a perfect BMI and sleep score.
They also set initial rents higher because they know they’re locked in forever. Some stop renting altogether and just let relatives live there.

Result: rent goes up, inventory goes down, and getting an apartment in Freedopolis is nearly impossible.
The mayor says: “Fine, the government will build affordable housing.”

The city hires consultants. The consultants make plans. City planning agency reviews the plans. Everyone bills hourly. The city pays for the back and forth. Two years later, they produce a 900-page plan they could finally agree on.
Then they run a tender process. No serious builder bids because the plan is obviously impossible.
So the mayor calls in a favor with his brother’s construction company to take on the job nobody wants.
The brother says: “I’ll do it, but only cost-plus, and we need flexibility because your plan appears to be ambiguous.”
Now there’s a Bermuda Triangle of consultants, contractors, and permitting agencies emailing each other “just circling back” on the taxpayer dollar.

Then they notice lawsuits piling up. Neighbors sue because shadows. Activists sue because vibes. A guy with a Substack sues because the building is colonialist. Someone claims ancestral rights to the parking lot.
The city settles with everyone.
The budget is now 5x.

Eventually, after spending 10x, the shiny new affordable apartment building opens.
The mayor announces: “No credit checks. No employment checks. No sleep-score discrimination. Housing is a human right.”

At first, 100 normal young workers move in.
Alongside with 30 thugs.
The workers start moving out. More thugs move in.
Police stop coming.
Now nobody wants to live near the building. Rent in the remaining normal neighborhoods skyrockets.

The mayor declares a housing crisis caused by capitalism and proposes a new tax on anyone renting out their apartments or owning luxury property (which is by now any property not next to the mayor’s affordable housing project).

Next episode: Freedopolis builds a government grocery store to make bananas cheaper.

[Sue Knows Best @sues86453]

Pay attention now!

Joe legal works in construction, has a Social Security number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.

Jose illegal also works in construction has no Social Security number and makes $15.00 per hour cash, under the table.

Ready?... now pay attention....

Joe legal: $25.00 per hour × 40 hours = $1,000.00 per week or $52,000.00 per year. Now, take 31% away for State and Federal taxes. Joe legal now has $31,231.00.

Jose illegal: $15.00 an hour × 40 hours = $600.00 per week or $31,200.00 per year. Jose illegal pays no taxes. Jose illegal now has $31,200.00.

Joe legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe legal now has $24,031.00.

Jose illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the State and local clinics and emergency hospitals at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe legal spends $500.00 per month for food or $6,000.00 per year. Joe legal now has $18,031.00.

Jose illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps, WIC and welfare. Jose illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe legal pays rent of 1,200.00 per month or $14,400.00 per year. Joe legal now has $9,631.00.

Jose illegal receives $500.00 per month Federal rent subsidy. Jose illegal pays out that $500.00 per month or $6,000.00 per year. Jose illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe legal pays $200.00 per month or $2,400.00 per year for car insurance. Some of that is uninsured motorist insurance. Joe legal now has $7,231.00.

Jose illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance."... and still has $31,000.00.

Joe legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline.. etc.

Jose illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline and what he sends out of the country every month....

Joe legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.

Jose illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe legal's and Jose illegal's children both attend the same elementary school.

Joe legal pays for his children's lunches while...

Jose illegal's children get a government-sponsored lunch.

Jose illegal's children have an after school ESL program.

Joe legal's children go home.

Now, when they reach college age...

Joe legal's kids may not get into a State school and may not qualify for scholarships, grants or other tuition help, even though Joe has been paying for State schools through his taxes, while...

Jose illegal's kids go to the, 'head of the class' because they are a minority.

Joe legal and Jose illegal both benefit from the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not.

Do you get it, now?

If we vote for or support any politician that supports illegal aliens,... we are part of the problem.

Its way PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!

[₿en Wehrman @benwehrman]

"You actually think all non-White people should be deported from White countries?"

Counter-question:

You actually think White people should be the only race on Earth that's banned from having a single country where they're allowed to be 90%+ majority, and must instead be forced to compete with every brown person in the world for housing, jobs, public infrastructure/resources, all while paying all of these groups boatloads of welfare to outbreed them to extinction?

Stop letting leeches set the frame.

You are not a bad person for simply wanting what every other race on Earth has: a HOME where your people can exist in peace, free of the chaos and energy-drain of multiculturalism.

[Bethany Cherisse @BethanyCherisse]

This is COVID-19 2.0.

The fuel shortages are engineered.

Completely fabricated by the club of the powerful ruling elite.

They want to limit your travel.

They want to control your food supply.

They want to force you into the cities.

They want to make you 100% reliant on them.

They want to force your compliance by reliance.

They want to control you.

Five minutes into the idea of a shortage, and they already have you begging for mandates.

Begging for more government control.

They have the media sell you the fear, available on every screen and free on every corner.

Everywhere you look, there is an sensationalised diet of fear free for the taking.

And oh boy do you eat it up, down it like liquor, consume it like candy.

In a frenzied panic, you yourselves create a shortage that didn't previously exist.

And your inane, fear-fuelled, panicked hysteria causes the demand to outstrip the supply.

And then the shortages do start.

And of course, the shortage of one necessity flows on to the next, as the supply chain dictates.

First comes fuel rations.

Then come food rations.

Then comes limits on where you can go, and when, and why.

Then comes a digital system you have to opt in to which allows you to get your coupons and passes to buy your fuel, buy your food, and travel.

Nothing unscrutinised. Everything monitored and limited.

Controlled.

Because they want to completely control you.

And like the absolutely brain-dead bootlickers that you are, you crawl to their feet and beg for the solution that was pre-determined before the manufactured crisis began.

"Govern me harder, daddy. Just keep me safe", you wail desperately from your knees.

Too stupid to even realise that you quite literally construct your own prison and demand your own jailers.

What an embarrassment you all are.

[Tarric Brooker aka Avid Commentator 🇦🇺 @AvidCommentator]

Dave: So you are one of the largest producers of energy in the world?

Australia: Yes Dave.

D: But you only have enough refining capacity for 20% of your daily fuel needs?

A: Yes Dave.

D: And you rely heavily on fuel imports from nations that overwhelmingly don't have oil production of their own to meet their own needs, making you even more vulnerable to global supply shocks?

A: Yes Dave.

[Sam @xwastheone]

Paper money was never supposed to be the money.

It was a receipt.

You deposited gold at a bank.
The bank gave you a note that said:

"The bearer of this note may redeem it for X amount of gold."

That's all a dollar was. A claim ticket.

The paper had no value.
The gold in the vault did.
The paper just made it easier to carry.

This system worked for centuries.
Every major currency was backed this way.
The British pound.
The French franc.
The U.S. dollar.

Then, slowly, governments realized something:

If people trust the paper,
they never come for the gold.
So they printed more notes than they had gold.
Then more.
Then more.

When too many people asked questions,
they closed the gold window.

That was supposed to be temporary.

55 years later, the dollar is still backed by nothing
but trust. And that trust has cost you 97% of your purchasing power.

The receipt became the money.
Global money became trust-based.

And money became nothing but a promise
that nobody has to keep.

[TaG_SteR @TheGamerTag2]

Let's start calling it for what it is, Europhobia. We have to use their own language choices against them.

[AshleY @Aku_700]

•When a Muslim is attacked, it’s called Islamophobia

•When a Jewish person is attacked, it’s anti-Semitism.

•When a Black person is attacked, it’s racism.

•When a trans person is attacked, it’s
transphobia.

•But when a White person is attacked?
It’s just business as usual.

Funny how that works.
Double standards don’t create justice — they destroy it

Happy black History Month 💔💔

[0️⃣BlackBetty ⚓️ @BabyD1111229]

PARENTS NEED TO WAKE UP... 😆😆

Your 7-year-old wakes up exhausted.
Not because he's sick.
Because it's 6AM.

You pour him cereal.
Not because it's healthy.
Because it's quick.

He stares at an iPad.
Not because it's good for him.
Because you need to get ready.

The school calls later:
“He’s sick”
"He can't focus"
"He can't sit still"
"He needs testing"

The doctor writes a prescription.
Not because your boy is broken.
Because the system is.

The truth?
His brain and body is FIGHTING:
- Chemical food dyes
- Heavy metals
- Sugar crashes
- Screen addiction
- EMF signals
- Sleep deprivation
- Natural energy

But we medicate the child. Instead of fixing the cause.
Your grandfather's kids:

- No screens
- Played outside
- Ate real food
- Slept well
- Moved freely

No pills needed.

Modern parenting isn't convenience.
It's warfare. Against your own child.

Give him a chance:
- Clean food
- Real sleep
- Free play
- Natural movement

DON'T give him pills. The system wants patients.

CHOOSE WISELY...

H/T 🎩 Kelly Brown

[Wokal Distance @wokal_distance]

This doesn't work for normal men and I'm going to explain why:

What Tom Holland is doing here is called "counter-signalling." This works by demonstrating that you have so much surplus social status that you can get away with breaking social norms and expectations.

For example: at most jobs everyone wears a suit or uniform to work and shows up at 8 AM...except for the owner of the company who shows up at noon wearing a t-shirt and jeans. The owner can do that because, as the owner, he has so much influence and status within the company that he can break the dresscode amd show up late and still get away with it. The regular employees can't do this, if they ever even tried it they would get fired.

The same goes with the video below.

Tom Holland can do it because he's a millionaire actor who plays spiderman, and Zendaya loves it because it's a display of the fact that he has so much social status that he can do this stuff and get away with it. If a regular man tried this on a first date (or even a 1pth date) it would look completely cringy. Being able to pull this off is a result of Tom Holland having enormous social status, it isn't the reason he has that status. It like the company owner: he doesn't own the company because he wears tshirts and shows up late, he wears tshirts and shows up late because he owns the company.

Telling young men to aspire to do drag to get a girl gets the causation exactly backwards— Tom Holland isn't famous cause he can pull this off, he cannpull this off because he is rich and famous. This won't work for normal men because they don't have the social status to pull this off; confidence and "security" are irrelevant. I can have the security and confidence to show up late to work wearing a t-shirt instead of my suit or uniform; but if I do that I'll still get fired.

The same thing applies here.

How much status you have and the social position you occupy play a big role in determining how the signals you send get interpreted. A regular woman talking to a regular guy is going to have very different opinion of him if he shows up in drag than she does of the famous actor does over the top performative drag on a TV show.

Telling young men that secure masculinity looks like doing drag performances is like telling people trying to get a promotion at work that they should wear t-shirts and show up late.

It doesn't work that way.

[Rock Chartrand @RockChartrand]

Larping communists in semi-free countries are vastly dumber than people who actually live under communism, and for a simple reason: they’re protected from consequences.
In freer societies, constitutions and leftover restraints on power act like guardrails. They absorb the damage of bad ideas. So people can spend their entire lives indulging in fantasies about collectivism without ever having to pay the price for them.

In countries without those guardrails, people can be stupid enough to demand communism once. They get it. And reality hits immediately. Food disappears. Speech disappears. People disappear. Regret follows fast.

But in semi-free countries, failure is delayed, so delusion hardens. Every atrocity is denied. Every corpse is explained away. Every disaster is blamed on someone else. The ideology doesn’t correct itself. It rots the mind.

The sick irony is that the people who’ve suffered under communism learn quickly. The people screaming loudest for it are the ones most insulated from its effects, using other people’s misery as a prop to protect their ego.

[Rock Chartrand @RockChartrand]

What socialists either don’t understand or refuse to accept is that capitalism doesn’t give you stuff. It gives you the opportunity to earn stuff and the right to own what you earn.

There is no entitlement to outcomes. Only freedom of action and responsibility for results.

When they demand “stuff” as a moral claim, all they accomplish is stripping others of both opportunity and property.
They don’t create wealth. They confiscate it. And in the process, they destroy the very conditions that make earning and ownership possible in the first place.

Capitalism offers dignity through production, while socialism offers dependency through plunder.

[Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏 @TruthFairy131]

🔥 ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR

Our National Anthem had another verse before 1984.

When Aussies voted for ‘Advance Australia Fair’ to become our National Anthem, it included the original verse.

Labor removed it under Bob Hawke to make it more ‘inclusive’ for a ‘New Modern Australia’. (Their words).

Original Verse:

“Should foreign foe sight our coast, Or dare a foot to land,
Well rouse to arms like sires of yore, To guard our native strand;

Brittania then shall surely know,
Beyond wide ocean's roll,
Her sons in fair Australia's land
Still keep a Brtish soul.

In joyful strains then let us sing
"Advance Australia fair!"

[Will Tanner @Will_Tanner_1]

The magic dirt theory of college

"Why don't we just put a dozen nuclear reactors in the Congo so it has cheap and reliable electricity, and let the Congolese run it so they have good jobs"

"Why don't we just help felons move into nice neighborhoods in good school zones so they become like the nice middle class people currently in those neighborhoods"

"Why don't we just forgive repeat offenders so they learn to be nice"

Hierarchy and exclusion are necessary to a functioning society. Refusing to recognize that is why nothing works now; equality is a false god that brings dire plagues with it

[WULF @DerWulf]

Weak father = Slutty daughter
Dominating mother = Mama's boy
Narcissistic mother = Insecure son
Absent father = Self-hating children
Poor marriages = Unhappy Homes
Unhappy home = Unhappy society

Broken homes breed broken men, and brokenmen burn the world.

Strong father = Confident daughter
Feminine mother = Masculine son
Loving parents = Secure children
Healthy marriage = peaceful home
Peaceful home = Strong society

[Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz]

Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.

$30 per seat per month.

$1.4 million annually.

I called it "digital transformation."

The board loved that phrase.

They approved it in eleven minutes.

No one asked what it would actually do.

Including me.

I told everyone it would "10x productivity."

That's not a real number.

But it sounds like one.

HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.

I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."

They stopped asking.

Three months later I checked the usage reports.

47 people had opened it.

12 had used it more than once.

One of them was me.

I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.

It took 45 seconds.

Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.

But I called it a "pilot success."

Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.

The CFO asked about ROI.

I showed him a graph.

The graph went up and to the right.

It measured "AI enablement."

I made that metric up.

He nodded approvingly.

We're "AI-enabled" now.

I don't know what that means.

But it's in our investor deck.

A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.

I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."

He asked what that meant.

I said "compliance."

He asked which compliance.

I said "all of them."

He looked skeptical.

I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."

He stopped asking questions.

Microsoft sent a case study team.

They wanted to feature us as a success story.

I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."

I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.

They didn't verify it.

They never do.

Now we're on Microsoft's website.

"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."

The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.

He got 3,000 likes.

He's never used Copilot.

None of the executives have.

We have an exemption.

"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."

I wrote that policy.

The licenses renew next month.

I'm requesting an expansion.

5,000 more seats.

We haven't used the first 4,000.

But this time we'll "drive adoption."

Adoption means mandatory training.

Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.

But completion will be tracked.

Completion is a metric.

Metrics go in dashboards.

Dashboards go in board presentations.

Board presentations get me promoted.

I'll be SVP by Q3.

I still don't know what Copilot does.

But I know what it's for.

It's for showing we're "investing in AI."

Investment means spending.

Spending means commitment.

Commitment means we're serious about the future.

The future is whatever I say it is.

As long as the graph goes up and to the right.

[Daniel Concannon @TooWhiteToTweet]

"Why are White people so afraid of becoming a minority? Does America treat minorities poorly or something?"

Anti-White fiends constantly ask this question as though it's a rhetorical "own." As though it's a lights-out, mic-drop moment. As though calling us “afraid” is some genius-level reverse-psychology tactic that will make us embrace our extinction so as to not be perceived as weak - because this makes sense to someone who operates with the emotional capacity of a petulant elementary schooler and assumes that everyone else is on their same, severely underdeveloped level.

They ask why we object to the de-White-ification of our nations as though the answer isn't entirely obvious and entirely defensible.

They're not interested in the answer, of course, as they're only here to subvert and destroy - but let's answer nonetheless:

White people, as a majority, are the most hated and discriminated against people in America. Again: that's how we're treated as a majority. Should we expect that to change once we're a minority?

The overwhelming majority of interracial crime is committed by minorities against Whites. Should we expect that to change once we're a minority?

Whites are officially discriminated against in hiring and academic admissions. Should we expect that to change once we're a minority?

The majority of non-Whites do not support free speech or gun rights, two foundational principles of the American nation supported by the majority of White Americans. Should we expect that to change once we're a minority?

The broader political beliefs and voting patterns of the majority of non-Whites are at odds with those of the majority of White Americans. Should we expect that to change once we're a minority?

Latinos & Blacks are the largest non-White population blocks. Average lifetime US budget impact for:
Latino = negative -$588k
Black = negative -$751k
White = positive +$221k
Should we expect the US budget to improve once we're a minority?

Restate the question around places where Whites are already a minority:

Question: Why are White people so afraid of going to Detroit / Baltimore / DC / St Louis / Memphis / etc?

Answer: Because they don't want to die.

Latino males murder at three times the rate of White males. Black males murder at eighteen times the rate of White males (2021 FBI numbers). Should we expect this to change once White people are a minority?

Minorities in America are the most well-treated, catered to, provided for, and glorified non-majority that has ever existed anywhere. For at least two generations, minorities in America have been the beneficiaries of unambiguous privilege over the White majority.

Whites are the most altruistic group. White people have, by far, the lowest in-group preference of any race. You can make your own value judgements of these traits, but the data bears these facts out. This results in the observable pattern of Whites treating non-Whites well, while non-Whites do not reciprocate (spare me the NAXALT, we're talking about broad social patterns).

So the answer to "does America treat minorities badly?" is an emphatic "no."

But what no one will say out loud is that minorities treat Whites - and America - poorly.

Even the most bleeding-heart Whites know this, which is why they don't move to non-White neighborhoods. Many minorities treat their own homogeneous areas so poorly that the minute one can afford to, they flee... to a Whiter area.

Before any of this, though, the real question is:

Why should any people be minoritized in their own country?

There are a million reasons to reject it, but "because we don't want to" is enough.

No race voluntarily suicides itself.

No race embraces its own genocide.

The very notion is fundamentally insane.

[Fathers Diary @Fathers_Diary]

Peak male experiences;

> Having your finances fixed
> Watching something you built grow
> Your mother saying she's proud of you
> Winning a professional fight
> Sitting in silence after a major win, realizing you don’t need to prove anything anymore
> A younger man seeking your advice and recognizing yourself in him.
> Owning your first real estate property
> Someone calling you “sir” and realizing they mean it with respect
> Fixing something with your hands that once intimidated you.
> "I'm proud of you son " coming from your dad