I’ve worked the floors and walked behind the locked doors of residential care.
I’m here to talk about the things that don’t make it into brochures, treatment meetings, or the “trauma-informed” training slides.
This account is anonymous, but experience is not.
The people defending her filming it too “as evidence for evaluation,” like what??? Regardless of what else is happening, this is a tantrum - a very normal behavior for the age, but we think the child is the problem?? Maybe don’t record yourself brute forcing expectations, continuing a power struggle when the child clearly isn’t regulated and okay, while holding back laughing when he pulls your hair.
@TheEXECUTlONER_ If I were the staff, I’d do the same thing. Safety rules exist for a reason and increase liability risk when they’re not followed.
Not only that, they were recording??! Good thing they caught her doing her job. Literal video evidence that could’ve been used in a lawsuit 😂
@ChristineW7@JennMGreenberg I appreciate the question. Those two pretty much go hand-in-hand. Reducing stimuli isn’t limited to physical space. It can also mean less words, attention, and pressure. So when I say light, I mean a few short, intentional emotional validation statements without over-talking
Yeah, it's non-negotiable. Safety rules don’t change or get moved, but the approach is controllable. When a toddler is already past the point of compliance, forcing during continued escalation doesn’t usually mitigate the power struggle. Sometimes a different approach (redirection, reduced stimulation, light validation, or a brief pause) is all it takes to help bring them down enough to follow through.
@NoblestCalling 110% agree with everything you've said, and regardless of the cause, continuing the power struggle by forcing the expectation only escalated the behavioral response.
@DugganTheOne@yourstruly_98 We have an increase in permissive parents who don't do anything to support developmental learning and skill-building. If you want to debate the lack of discipline, then that's the real issue.
If a foster parent, residential staff member, therapist, or teacher “spanks” a child, people would call it abuse immediately.
If a biological parent “spanks” a child, people relabel it as discipline.
Make it make sense.
Crediting civilization’s achievements, like putting men on the moon, to spanking is ideological, not evidence. Past generations normalized many things we now understand differently.
A perfect example is the advancement of developmental science, which has deepened our understanding of physical discipline. Those research findings show that spanking can elicit short-term compliance through fear-based learning, while failing to provide long-term behavioral correction.
Effective discipline requires correction, but physical reactivity does not support the conditions for long-term teaching or skill development.
As someone who works with children, I see this every day. Sharing a roof is not the same as being emotionally and mentally involved in their life. You can live with your child and still be disconnected from their reality.
Parenting is hard, but hardship doesn’t excuse absence.
Not programming: Calling a schedule “structure” while the actual day runs on staff mood, crisis response, or whatever happens next.
Real programming: A predictable routine with expectations, transitions, and consistent follow-through.
Structure has to be lived, not laminated.
Some adults hear “child development” and treat it like radical propaganda, then lose their minds over not understanding a child's undeveloped brain.
Nothing says “teaching self-control” quite like trying to spank the neuroscience out of a dysregulated child.
They’re not identical, but gentle parenting sits comfortably under the broader, research-backed umbrella of authoritative parenting.
I’m really hoping you’re mixing up authoritative with authoritarian, because authoritative parenting is one of the most consistently supported styles in developmental psychology for positive long-term child outcomes.
@harrrmy At this point, it’s intentional. I never see them engage with people who explain the difference, because arguing against reality keeps the whole delusion standing while they increase their engagement count in the process.
@marasmith7@PeacefulFathers You’re talking about permissive parenting.
Gentle parenting falls under the authoritative parenting umbrella: connection, coaching, clear limits, and consequences without fear-based discipline.
So yes, “no” is in the vocabulary.
@JoabPro_ If adults deserve apologies and explanations, children do too.
Adults model accountability by holding themselves to the same standards they expect from children.
They don’t teach that responsibility by refusing to demonstrate it.