It's sunny in Ottawa, but one of the darkest weeks for our democracy.
The Liberals are ramming through, C-9 (hate), C-22 (lawful access) and C-34 (digital safety).
Give me a few minutes to explain. ⬇️
DISTURBING: An Ontario man repeatedly cried out “Help me” during a government-approved euthanasia procedure after the drugs failed to work as intended, exposing a dark reality many people never expected to witness.
What was marketed as a peaceful, dignified death became a nightmare, leaving a family to watch their father’s final moments descend into chaos.
The man remained conscious and visibly distressed after sedation failed, repeatedly calling for help until additional drugs finally rendered him unconscious. His final moments, witnesses say, were marked not by peace, but by repeated pleas for help.
The case is fueling outrage because it wasn’t an isolated incident. Another Canadian patient resumed breathing after being declared dead, while a Belgian euthanasia case ended with allegations that a woman was suffocated after the lethal injection failed.
Opponents argue these cases expose a side of MAiD hidden from the public, one where procedures don’t go according to plan and families are left with traumatic final memories.
If a man can spend his final moments crying “Help me” in front of witnesses, what happens in the cases the public never hears about?
@zeeemedia's explosive report reveals why so many people believe this is just the tip of the iceberg.
🚨 For anyone tracking the under-16 social media bans in Canada and the UK, you might have noticed the government suddenly walking back some specific wording.
They backed off forcing you to upload credit cards or facial scans because of the public backlash, and now they’re pushing a "backend token system". It sounds less intrusive on the surface, but here is the truth about what that actually means, because most people are being completely misled by that marketing:
A cryptographic token isn't a magic, anonymous poker chip. To work, a token has to be anchored to something verified. That means your physical device, your phone carrier contract, or your real identity is permanently tethered to that token.
Every single time your phone throws that token to let you log into an app, it logs exactly who you are, where you are, and what you're doing.
It isn't a privacy shield to protect kids. It's a digital passport that tracks an adult's every move across the internet.
VPN companies will leave Canada. The government will force companies to retain your data for one year. The legal threshold for police access to your data will be lowered. Meanwhile, the federal government is cancelling all debate on Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, in order to pass this legislation before Parliament adjourns on Friday, June 19. Now, more than ever before, Canadians who care about privacy must urge their Members of Parliament to defeat Bill C-22. This is a critical moment in our history: will Canada be a free nation or a surveillance state? Canadians have defeated "lawful access" legislation before, and we must do so again.
Contact your MP today: https://t.co/Q29tbbyKFO
Australia banned X for children but not BlueSky.
Britain is banning X for children but not BlueSky.
This proves one thing.
It's not about protecting children.
It's about censorship and controlling the narrative.
Instead of removing criminals, the UK is removing people’s ability to expose crimes — through a social media ban (from which Bluesky is conveniently exempt)
There you go. The United States is built on a limitless ethos of entrepreneurship, innovation, and excellence. Canada is built on feminized and "empathetic" parasitic taxation fuelled by envy and resentment toward those who produce.
Tomorrow morning at 9:45 AM, the Bank of Canada is going to talk to us about interest rates. They want you distracted and stressing over your mortgage, because while you’re looking over there, the government just quietly snuck a massive law change into the budget.
They pushed the Bank Act review from 2026 out to 2033, giving the big banks a 7-year free pass from accountability while they clear $19 billion a quarter. Watch the full video to see how they did it.
Just a friendly reminder if you have not figured it out yet but the government is not here to protect you.. they are here to protect themselves, the elites and their own pockets..
Canada's New Social Media Ban is NOT About Your Children | Here's What They're NOT Telling You
Canada just announced the Digital Safety Act — a social media ban for anyone under 16.
Most Canadians think this is about protecting children. It isn't.
To enforce a social media ban, every single Canadian will have to prove their age by attaching government-approved ID to their social media accounts. That's not child protection. That's a digital ID.
And once you're verified on one platform, that verification follows you everywhere — linking every account you own under your real identity.
But it gets worse.
This isn't a standalone policy. This is the missing piece that connects Bill C-9, C-22 and C-8 into a complete surveillance and censorship system.
Bill C-9 defines what you can and cannot say online. Bill C-22 forces platforms to save your data for up to one year. Bill C-8 gives the government the power to cut you off the internet entirely.
The digital ID created by this social media ban is what connects all three.
And they're selling it to you as child protection.
Don't be fooled. All these bills are interconnected — and this is the last piece of the puzzle.
https://t.co/8fky3EXQmF
This. Is. Terrifying.
This technology should NEVER be allowed to be used.
Ford can fvck right off and so can the Congress members who voted to put this tech in vehicles starting in 2027.
Carbon taxes on refineries make it more expensive to drive.
Carbon taxes on fertilizer plants make it more expensive to eat.
Carbon taxes on electricity make it more expensive to live.
Carbon taxes on Canadian businesses don't cut emissions. They cut Canadian jobs.
“We’re not saying Canada is out of the G7,” the official said.
“But most democracies prefer to include the voters in the democracy part.”
WASHINGTON — Officials in the Trump administration say the United States is “closely monitoring developments in Canada” after what they describe as “unusual democratic innovations” taking place north of the border.
According to sources familiar with internal discussions, the topic recently surfaced during a review of G7 relations.
One senior official reportedly summarized the concern bluntly:
“The G7 is supposed to be a club of stable democracies. If that standard changes, the club might have to change too.”
The comments come as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is widely expected to secure a majority government without holding a general election, a development that has reportedly caught the attention of several officials in Washington.
“This is fascinating,” one administration aide said. “We’re trying to understand the new Canadian model where you get a full governing mandate without the inconvenience of voters.”
Another official added that the U.S. is “carefully studying the situation.”
“For decades Canada was considered one of the most stable democracies in the world,” the aide said. “Now we’re seeing some… creative interpretations of how democratic legitimacy works.”
While no formal action has been proposed, insiders say the discussion briefly touched on the broader question of whether all current G7 members still meet the political and economic standards the group was originally built around.
“The G7 isn’t a historical society,” one official reportedly said. “It’s supposed to represent the world’s leading democracies and economies.”
When asked if Canada’s membership could eventually come into question, another source responded cautiously.
He paused.
“We’re not saying Canada is out of the G7,” the official said.
“But most democracies prefer to include the voters in the democracy part.”
Imagine if Trump started freezing bank accounts of protesters.
Imagine if Trump started taking away your private property rights.
Imagine if Trump made bills that made religious texts illegal.
Imagine if Trump had people debanked.
Imagine if Trump blocked your access to independent news online and created bills that made many forms of speech punishable with fines and jail time.
Imagine if Trump was using Americans pension funds and tax income to invest in his own companies and make himself a billionaire.
Imagine if Trump was stealing a majority government right now with bribery.
Canadians blindfolds on the issues happening HERE is abhorrent.
There are two battlefields: 1) the kinetic war against the West, which Islam cannot win; 2) the non-kinetic war against the West, which Islam is winning.
Islamic leaders, activists, politicians, and thinkers explained long ago that Islam will defeat the West in three ways:
1) by the womb of their women
2) via hijrah (migration), which the West is keen on helping via their orgiastic open borders policies
3) by using the West's miserable freedoms against us
They have screamed this repeatedly but we refuse to listen because of parasitic suicidal empathy.
Horrible news.
The Liberal Government has just successfully “censored their censorship bill” by working with the separatist Bloc Quebecois to end committee debate and ram the bill through Parliament.
The bill seeks to make it easier to prosecute and arrest Canadians for political and religious expression by watering down the definition of “hate speech” and removing important safeguards against abuse.
We’ll continue the fight in Parliament, but there’s no way to sugar-coat the situation.
This is a dark day for free speech in Canada.
We live in the bread basket of the world but starve
We live in a nation of oil but cant afford gas
We live in a country with socialized HC but no one has a doctor
We have safe supply drugs but over doses are rising
We live in a huge country with low population but homelesness tripled
We have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms but are arrested for words
Canada is no longer the land of milk and honey
Unless youre an immigrant