The Regulatory Review

Your daily source for regulatory news, analysis & commentary. From the Penn Program on Regulation at @Penn. RTs & links ≠ endorsements.

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

DOJ’s corporate enforcement policy uses leniency to steer business conduct, so observers should treat it as regulation by incentive, argues @Duncan_Levin of @Harvard_Law. https://t.co/c0lVviVfsp

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

Faster slaughterhouse line speeds can endanger workers and animals, so FSIS should count those harms in its regulatory analysis, argues Andrew Stawasz of @UMichLaw. https://t.co/6MpMkGMhou

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

In a recent article, Robin Kundis Craig of @kulawschool argues that climate-driven water scarcity may strain the right to travel and calls for flexible review of building moratoria. https://t.co/2M9MJ70AAY

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

In a recent essay, @Duncan_Levin of @Harvard_Law argues that DOJ’s corporate enforcement policy turns prosecutorial leniency into business regulation and calls for recognizing its regulatory role. https://t.co/c0lVviVfsp

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

FSIS’s proposed line-speed rules may ignore worker safety by overreading Seven County, so courts and agencies should enforce reasoned decision-making, argues Andrew Stawasz of @UMichLaw. https://t.co/6MpMkGMhou

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

In a recent article, Andrew Stawasz of @UMichLaw argues that new slaughterhouse line-speed rules misuse Seven County and calls for reasoned review of worker and animal safety harms. https://t.co/6MpMkGMhou

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

In this week's Saturday Seminar, scholars examine bank and cryptocurrency regulation and assess potential risks to financial stability and resilience. https://t.co/x9a1AgGlU4

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

AI sandboxes may favor large firms and create false regulatory legitimacy, so the EU should refine access, liability, and oversight rules. https://t.co/4TMkj0ZhmP

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

EU AI sandboxes may give firms room to test risky systems without resolving safety concerns, so regulators should clarify oversight rules. https://t.co/4TMkj0ZhmP

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

Platforms may over-remove content under the TAKE IT DOWN Act, so policymakers should protect victims while preserving free speech safeguards, argues Minhua Li of @GeorgetownLaw. https://t.co/uCZPf7Fm4c

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

Outdated privacy rules can slow AI tools that improve diagnoses and learning, so regulators should pair broader data sharing with stronger safeguards, argue @KevinTFrazier and Gillian Glover of @UTexasLaw. https://t.co/htcgVZqkhl

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

A recent essay argues that EU AI sandboxes may not balance innovation and safety and calls for clearer rules and safeguards. https://t.co/YQGUMs6UfS

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

The TAKE IT DOWN Act can help remove non-consensual intimate images, but loopholes and over-censorship risks remain, so lawmakers should add stronger safeguards, argues Minhua Li of @GeorgetownLaw. https://t.co/uCZPf7Fm4c

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

In a recent essay, Minhua Li of @GeorgetownLaw argues that the TAKE IT DOWN Act can curb non-consensual intimate images but needs safeguards against loopholes and over-removal. https://t.co/uCZPf7Fm4c

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

Privacy laws can block data sharing needed for better health and education AI, so regulators should shift from data minimization to stewardship, argue @KevinTFrazier and Gillian Glover of @UTexasLaw. https://t.co/htcgVZqkhl

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

In a recent essay, @KevinTFrazier and Gillian Glover of @UTexasLaw argue that privacy laws restrict data sharing needed for AI progress and call for data stewardship. https://t.co/htcgVZqkhl

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

In this week’s Saturday Seminar, scholars debate whether non-compete agreements should be regulated as anticompetitive restraints or preserved to protect legitimate business interests. https://t.co/GhMor2Vvxu

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

Mandatory regulation can fail when politics, enforcement limits, or litigation risks get in the way, so policymakers should use voluntary programs, argues @LuisInaraja of @GonzagaLaw. https://t.co/HwhCdjJ3ru

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

Insurers’ AI tools can cut off medically necessary care behind trade-secret walls, so regulators should mandate validation and monitoring, argues @jenndoliva of @IUMaurerLaw. https://t.co/Gumy7COYrQ

[The Regulatory Review @TheRegReview]

In a recent article, @LuisInaraja of @GonzagaLaw argues that mandatory regulation can be politically, practically, or legally blocked and calls for voluntary programs. https://t.co/HwhCdjJ3ru