The PM is upset today that people have "grievances" against Labor.
Under his government:
- taxes are the highest on record and going up more
- inflation and interest rates are the highest in the developed world
- energy prices have skyrocketed by 38%
- we have lost our nickel, plastics, flat glass and urea industries
- we are begging the rest of the world to keep supplying us oil
- young people can't buy a home because migration is running 100,000 people a year MORE than normal
- people that hate Australia have been allowed to stay and spread their hate with no sanction
Australia has been LOSING under Labor and the PM thinks that anyone that complains about it is being disrespectful.
If the PM wants more respect he could try doing a better job.
Women are not designed to be independent, making decisions without the guidance of either their father or a husband. It’s essentially the same thing as letting children decide what they want. I say this, as someone most people would consider to be a high IQ competent woman. Everything from our biology to our psychology is not created for independence or total autonomy. It’s not even a weakness or a bug. It’s a feature. Women thrive and become the best version of themselves under Patriarchy, and they are the biggest benefactors of patriarchal systems. It’s the same way that children who live in well organized and structured environments growing up thrive and do well, when children who have complete autonomy from a young age almost always self-destruct. Women have been programmed to see this as some sort of weakness or failure to admit, but it’s not. I have a better understanding of this now that I am in my matron era and can see things from a different perspective than I did when I was young. It’s my job to help younger women understand this as matrons always did historically. Unfortunately, our boomer predecessors fucked this up royally and decided that once the 1.7 kids flew the nest, it was party time and abdicated their responsibilities as matrons.
Ben Shapiro has a completely normal personal life.
His opponents include:
- Nick Fuentes (closeted homosexual neo-Nazi)
- Candace Owens (schizophrenic black lady)
- Tucker Carlson (jihad defender paid off by Russia and Qatar)
- Elijah Schaffer (drug addicted closeted homosexual who cheated on his wife with young boys while she was raising his infant children)
- Andrew Tate (Muslim human trafficker)
- Dan Bilzerian (Muslim pimp gambling drug addict who inherited his money from a Ponzi scheme and gave himself a heart attack in his 30s from snorting too much coke)
- Myron Gaines (Sudanese Muslim closeted homosexual who hates women)
- Sneako (Haitian jihadist deported from Australia for meeting with ISIS affiliates)
So just by being normal, Ben Shapiro wins. His opponents literally sound like a list of Arkham Asylum escapees, just a bunch of mentally retarded psychotic freaks involved in drugs, prostitution, gambling, neo-Nazism, jihadism.
Shapiro wins
Chris Williamson shared a powerful quote on his podcast with Jordan Peterson:
“The heaviest things in life aren’t iron and gold, but unmade decisions.”
He explained that much of our stress comes from decisions we’re refusing to make. Avoidance itself is a decision.
Jordan Peterson agreed: there is no such thing as indecision — only the decision to avoid. And you pay for that choice every single day.
This one really hit me hard.
What decision have you been avoiding that’s quietly weighing on you right now?
We should not forget the impact that Jordan Peterson had in arming us with arguments against progressives.
Nobody mainstream was able to do it like him.
great read, and a refreshing perspective especially given that most guys think that "dating around" somehow makes them alpha or something
the biggest flex is being with an amazing, beautiful woman who loves you completely and totally for who YOU are.
You may have heard this before. I have. But I loved reading it again.
In a mother's womb, there are two babies and one turns to the other and says, “Do you believe in life after
delivery?”
The other replies, “Of course there has to be something after delivery. Maybe we're here to prepare ourselves for what will be later. This can’t be the end.”
“Nonsense”, says the first baby, “There's no
life after delivery. We are here to enjoy ourselves. That’s it. Life after delivery? What kind of life would that be?”
“I don't know”, said the second, “but maybe there'll be
more light than here. Maybe we'll walk with our legs and eat with our mouths. Maybe we'll have other senses we can't understand now. Maybe it’s beyond our comprehension.”
“That’s ridiculous. Walking is impossible and eating with our mouths? That's absurd. The umbilical cord is what scientifically supplies nutrition and all that we need, but it's far too short. Life after delivery is to be logically excluded.”
The other baby says, “What if it's just different than
it is here? Maybe we don't need that physical cord anymore.”
The first replies, “Okay, if there were life after delivery, then tell me, why has no one ever come back from there?
Delivery is the end of life. And in the after delivery is nothing but darkness and silence and oblivion. It takes us nowhere.”
The second says, “But certainly we'll meet mother and she'll take care of us. She loves us. She made us.”
The first says, “You actually believe in mother? If mother exists, where is she now?”
“She's all around us. We are of her. It is in her that we live. Without her, this world would not and could not exist.”
“I don't see her. It's only logical that she's not here.”
“Sometimes when you're in silence and you really listen, you can perceive her presence. You can hear her loving voice calling down from above.”
Love it. So good. So spot on.
People work 8–10 hours a day, 5 days a week for someone else’s profit.
Then they spend 4 hours at night staring at screens.
Basically, living for weekends + 4 weeks PTO on repeat until age 65.
While the government takes 25–30% their income.
And we’re told this is “normal.”
I supported the Venezuela operation and I’m on board with acquiring Greenland because they both pass the only litmus test I care about: Will it be a net benefit to the United States? Venezuela and Greenland are low risk, high reward. Big wins for our people. We gain much and lose little or nothing. Easy call, as far as I’m concerned.
I’m not actually an isolationist. I’m just an America First conservative in the strictest sense of the term. Does the benefit for America outweigh the cost? It must, or it’s a bad policy. This is one of my absolute core political principles, and always has been.
With this Iran thing, I don’t see how the math works in our favor. Or at least it seems highly unlikely that it will work in our favor. And so I’m against it. If that puts me at odds with the administration, and with much of the conservative commentariat, so be it. I have to stick to what I believe.
People who have followed my work for a long time are not remotely surprised by my stance on this.