Brittany Sandau

Fuck it. 🤘🏻 🇺🇸

[Rep Andy Biggs @RepAndyBiggsAZ]

You need an ID to drive.
You need an ID to fly.
You need an ID to check into a hotel.
You need an ID to buy cold medicine.

The list goes on.

Why shouldn’t you need an ID to vote?

Save America. Pass the SAVE Act.

[2000s @PopCulture2000s]

24 years ago, linkin park released ‘in the end’ https://t.co/L2wUb3ABlG

[Steven Crowder @scrowder]

Change my Mind is back.

We’re live at SMU now!

[non aesthetic things @PicturesFoIder]

W friend for taking the baby.

[Brittany Sandau @TheSpazzMonster]

The way this world gets its feelings hurt blows my mind

[Officer Lew @officer_Lew]

Charlie Kirk never used hate speech.

He used speech they hated.

[Julie Borowski @JulieBorowski]

Yeah. Charlie Kirk did say, "I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."

Here's the full quote:

“Yeah, it's a great question. Thank you. So, I'm a big Second Amendment fan but I think most politicians are cowards when it comes to defending why we have a Second Amendment. This is why I would not be a good politician, or maybe I would, I don't know, because I actually speak my mind.

The Second Amendment is not about hunting. I love hunting. The Second Amendment is not even about personal defense. That is important. The Second Amendment is there, God forbid, so that you can defend yourself against a tyrannical government. And if that talk scares you — "wow, that's radical, Charlie, I don't know about that" — well then, you have not really read any of the literature of our Founding Fathers. Number two, you've not read any 20th-century history. You're just living in Narnia. By the way, if you're actually living in Narnia, you would be wiser than wherever you're living, because C.S. Lewis was really smart. So I don't know what alternative universe you're living in. You just don't want to face reality that governments tend to get tyrannical and that if people need an ability to protect themselves and their communities and their families.

Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.

You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.

So then, how do you reduce? Very simple. People say, oh, Charlie, how do you stop school shootings? I don't know. How did we stop shootings at baseball games? Because we have armed guards outside of baseball games. That's why. How did we stop all the shootings at airports? We have armed guards outside of airports. How do we stop all the shootings at banks? We have armed guards outside of banks. How did we stop all the shootings at gun shows? Notice there's not a lot of mass shootings at gun shows, there's all these guns. Because everyone's armed. If our money and our sporting events and our airplanes have armed guards, why don't our children?”

[Hazel Appleyard @HazelAppleyard]

“I want to live in a country where if a woman does not want to go to work after having a kid, she does not have to go to work and she could stay at home and raise those kids.”

When they tell you Charlie Kirk was an awful person, remember this video.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Tomorrow, I will have the honor of hosting the Charlie Kirk Show. Please join me as I pay tribute to my friend.

12:00PM ET
https://t.co/oemvxJ18Mq

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Exactly

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Yes

[Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11]

https://t.co/vPQNjn1NjX

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.

If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.

If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.

If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.

[Phil Labonte 🇺🇸 @philthatremains]

they don’t kill you for being fascist. they call you fascist in order to justify killing you

[Sunny @sunnyright]

People being like “oh you care about Kirk being murdered but you don’t care about school shootings”

I care about both because I’m not a fucking psychopath. I’m talented that way.

[The Critical Drinker @TheCriticalDri2]

Whether you agreed with him or not, Charlie Kirk is dead purely because some people didn't like what he had to say. That should outrage every single one of us.

[Phil Labonte 🇺🇸 @philthatremains]

very happy to see @JeffreeStar has a solid take on Charlie Kirk. Kudos

[Andy Milonakis @andymilonakis]

Celebrating a man’s death because you didn’t like his views is some real mentally insane shit

[Boyd Myers @boydmyers]

No, we don’t need to “have a conversation”.

You killed the guy willing to do that.