I will give my take on why neither Palestine nor Israel should actually exist, and how one actually plays into the other to morally justify an ethno-state at a time where such a thought is unconscionable when it is applied to Europe and whites in general
Palestine was
@RGIII@Gretegiii@OuttaPocketRG3 You look ridiculous. Enjoy the wealth that was bestowed upon you by cowardly whites. Your children will not experience the same.
Minnesota is learning the hard way what no one dares say aloud, which is that Somalia is a failed state because its people are a failed race. Their land shares the same equatorial coastline that once sustained Egyptian glory and Carthaginian might, but the race that inherited it could build nothing: not after contact, not after decades of Western medicine, food, and schooling poured into the dust, and not even when modern tools were placed directly into their savage black hands.
Every American knows Somalia from the images in Black Hawk Down, in which stone-age tribesmen are dragging American corpses through the streets, howling in triumph, high on khat and hate. And now the same race of animal-men descends like a plague upon Minnesota towns once carved by Norsemen, Germans, and the old Yankee blood that bled at Shiloh and the Marne.
Racial character cannot be altered by paperwork or platitudes. You can take them out of Somalia, but Somalia comes with them. We are the Dispossessed Majority, sacrificed on the altar of foreign import and bureaucratic guilt. Race is destiny and Somalia is hell because its people made it so. Now they are imported into the North to bring the same fate here. If the White race does not reassert sovereignty, it will be extinguished beneath a slow, swarthy tide dreaming of Mogadishu while looting the ruins of St. Paul. A nation that cannot say no will not exist much longer.
They never belonged here because a people who cannot build civilization cannot be trusted to inherit one. Every last one must go back.
An Open Letter to Vivek Ramaswamy Regarding his Dec, 17 2025 article in The New York Times
Vivek, you write, “There are two competing visions now emerging on the American right, and they are incompatible. One vision of American identity is based on lineage, blood and soil: Inherited attributes matter most. The purest form of an American is a so-called heritage American — one whose ancestry traces back to the founding of the United States or earlier.
“This view is now popularized by the Groyper right, a rapidly ascendant online movement that argues for the creation of a white-centric identity. This is a predictable response — one that I anticipated in my 2022 book, “Nation of Victims” — to anti-white discrimination over the last half-decade, and it is no longer just a fringe viewpoint.”
You start your piece by invoking 'blood and soil'—a phrase with Nazi connotations—to describe White Americans' growing frustration with their declining influence and wellbeing in cultural and political life. This rising pushback on the right comes from millions of good White people who feel they've been disproportionately disadvantaged in recent socio-political shifts. Framing these 'competing forces' in such loaded terms raises questions about whether your goal is fair critique or dismissal through guilt by association.
The Groyper froglets do not speak for White people or our legitimate interests and concerns. That phenomenon is a multiracial online spectacle led by a handful of provocateurs—taboo grifters—who built followings by serving up simple scapegoats and cheap cathartic release. I understand why it’s convenient for you, Vivek, to spotlight them as the public face of White advocacy—it lets you evade the substance of our actual grievances. But that deflection won’t work indefinitely. Sooner or later, you’ll have to address the real issues we raise.
“The alternative (and, in my view, correct) vision of American identity is based on ideals.”
America is not an abstract idea. It is a distinct people, the people who founded, built and continue to sustain it: White America. To this base we add many wonderful people from all backgrounds who have loved and productively contributed to this great country. But without White America, America’s Western character would be utterly erased. Remove any other group, and America would certainly change, but it would still fundamentally remain America.
“Americanness isn’t a scalar quality that varies based on your ancestry. It’s binary: Either you’re an American or you’re not. You are an American if you believe in the rule of law, in freedom of conscience and freedom of expression, in colorblind meritocracy, in the U.S. Constitution, in the American dream, and if you are a citizen who swears exclusive allegiance to our nation.”
I agree. American citizenship is not scalar, nor is the essence of America merely a set of abstract ideas, Vivek. While citizens today hail from every corner of the world, the nation's fundamental Western character was forged—and continues to be sustained by White Americans. To downplay or devalue that historic contribution is to undermine the unique role White Americans have played in building this country. It also risks eroding our legitimate claim to its cultural and institutional inheritance.
Consider the implications of your argument that America is "just an opinion" that anyone on Earth can adopt: It forces White Americans—whose ancestors built this nation across generations—to compete for their own inheritance against billions worldwide. Republican and Conservative leaders—such as yourself—tout the “benefits” of merit-based immigration. Benefits for whom? Under a merit-based immigration system that admits only "the best," White Americans would face even stiffer foreign-born competition for what their fathers and forefathers created. Framing America solely as a propositional nation risks turning it into a global contest, where the Founding Stock could gradually lose control of our country. America isn’t a sports arena where “earthlings” compete. It’s our home.
“As Ronald Reagan quipped, you can go to live in France, but you can’t become a Frenchman; but anyone from any corner of the world can come to live in the United States and become an American. No matter your ancestry, if you wait your turn and obtain citizenship, you are every bit as American as a Mayflower descendant, as long as you subscribe to the creed of the American founding and the culture that was born of it. This is what makes American exceptionalism possible.”
Those weren’t Reagan’s own words, but rather a letter from an anonymous author that he chose to share as he left office. While Reagan expressed admiration for the sentiments, he was human and fallible. He was days from his 78th birthday when he departed the White House, and many observers had noted signs of cognitive decline in his final years as president. Just a few years later, he publicly disclosed his Alzheimer’s diagnosis.
More importantly, who was the anonymous author of this letter, and what exactly did it say in full? Did the author speak more broadly to his devaluation of White Americans in favor of populations from non-Western countries? What we know about the letter is that it emphasizes America as an idea open to anyone, which downplays the role of cultural continuity and the experiences of the longest-standing demographic group: White Americans. It’s worth asking why some who most strongly champion the “America is an idea, not a people” view often appear to benefit—socially, politically, or professionally—from framing the nation in those terms.
“The divide between these two views is more foundational than policy divides between Republicans and Democrats. Older Republicans who may doubt the rising prevalence of the blood-and-soil view should think again. My social media feeds are littered with hundreds of slurs, most from accounts that I don’t recognize, about “pajeets” and “street shitters” and calls to deport me “back to India” (I was born and raised in Cincinnati and have never resided outside the U.S.).”
You tout your American birth as a flex on your critics, yet you dismiss generations of White American ancestry as mere historical accident. You embrace the "soil" in "blood and soil" when it confers citizenship to you, but emphatically reject the "blood"—because it never could. This selective “civic nationalism” is transparent in its self-interest.
The vulgarian attacks you endure online are merely the ugly froth on a deeper current. Millions of White Americans are weary of arguments carefully crafted to minimize our legitimate interests, our historic claims, and our role as the indispensable source of America's Western character.
Even MAGA—and, for now, Trump himself—appears to be turning against your position. As visas are revoked, the border strengthened, and birthright citizenship challenged to the roaring approval of many millions of White Americans, the proposition that America is merely an idea or a fortunate birthplace is fading. Your moment, Vivek, may be passing with it.
“Antisemitic statements are now normalized online, and it’s not limited to the internet either. Rod Dreher, a conservative writer, recently described a trip to Washington, D.C., where he estimated that a sizable minority of Republican Gen Z staffers are fans of Nick Fuentes.
“This new online-right movement doesn’t represent the views of most real-world Republican voters — take it from a son of Indian immigrants who dominates polling in Ohio’s G.O.P. primary for governor. But as one of the most vocal opponents of left-wing identity politics, I now see real reluctance from my former anti-woke peers to criticize the new identity politics on the right. This pattern eerily mirrors the hesitance of prominent Democrats to criticize woke excess in the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, even though most Democratic voters clearly never believed that math is racist, or that hard work and the written tradition are hallmarks of whiteness. That’s a big part of why Kamala Harris lost in such spectacular fashion. If the post-Trump G.O.P. makes the same mistake with our own identitarian fringe, we will meet a similar fate.”
You mentioned a particular taboo-grifting figure, but he's merely one of many in today's attention-driven online ecosystem. These egotistical provocateurs aren't new—only our easy access to them is—and they aren't the main reason your colleagues hesitate to criticize or disavow White American concerns and wellbeing.
Vivek, you've spoken proudly about your Indian heritage and Hindu faith, and no one demands you abandon that. By the same token, growing numbers of White Americans feel the same about our people, heritage, achievements, and stake in this country. We won't be argued or shamed out of it.
“Young people are often a leading indicator of where political winds are blowing, and the generational nature of the problem is remarkable. Many voters under 30 believe they will never be able to afford a home. They’re often saddled with college debt, and absent dramatic policy interventions, Social Security will most likely be curtailed before they ever receive benefits. They are understandably bitter about it.
“Their rising sense of economic insecurity conspires with pent-up psychosocial angst. Depression and anxiety are more prevalent among members of Gen Z than in prior American generations. In the absence of a shared national identity, they’re turning to tribalism and victimhood instead — Groyperism on the right, Zohran Mamdani-infused socialism on the left. So what’s the solution? We need to imagine a new American dream that delivers economic empowerment while also filling the next generation’s hunger for purpose and belonging. To achieve that vision, four conditions must be met.”
The decline in living standards for many Americans is a result of decades of policies that favored corporations over workers, offshoring jobs, and allowing wealth to concentrate at the top. Socially, the decline is a result of the White erasure of White America’s norms and sensibilities.
You complain about the trolls online, but again they are no more than uncouth expressions of real pain felt by millions of hardworking White Americans who are legitimately and righteously exasperated with the status-quo—ignored, devalued, and dismissed by both parties. We won’t be diminished to the status of an “opinion” that anyone can take on planet earth—not by you, not by anyone. This is our country. You're allowed to be a good American. Start acting like one by respecting the dignity of all citizens, including White Americans.
The rest of your article sounds like recycled campaign promises—lowering housing costs, cutting taxes, inspiring with national projects—but campaign promises are often shaped by campaign managers, consultants, and public relations firms to get their client elected. So I'll stop here: You wouldn’t say that a single, 45-year-old Californian cat mom newly converted to Hinduism has as much claim to the identity and destiny of Hindus as the generational Hindu, whose family and ancestors had fought and bled for that faith in India. Don’t you dare diminish our claim to an “opinion.” White America holds the keys to America as a Western country, Vivek. Diminish us and you destroy America.
BREAKING - Multiple dissident “right wing” accounts have been caught promoting an unregulated offshore crypto casino called BiggerZ, tied to Serbia, Pakistan, France, and Africa with no owners and no transparency.
The Judaeo-American Imperium is dying. The mask has slipped and the spell is breaking. We all feel it, and no man can arrest the decay. Yet still, we feast.
Because long before Americans were sent to murder their brothers, twice, and to crucify the God of the Germans upon the axis of the World, long before feral blacks were set loose in our communities and foreign savages defiled our daughters, there was 1607, when the Saxon crossed the sea with nothing but a Bible, a musket, and the will to burn himself into the land.
He starved, buried his sons in the cold clay, felled the forests and raised altars; and he did not ask permission.
Thanksgiving is a sacrament of endurance. It is the Anglo rite of the harvest, the feast of men who took and held what is now rightfully ours by sword-right and sacrifice. It is an offering to the ancestors who crossed the abyss, who broke the earth and lit the fire that fed Jamestown, Plymouth, and the long march west.
Now they tell us to repent, and they would turn the feast into a ritual of guilt, but the fire of 1607 still burns and this table was set in blood. It was never for everyone and it never will be.
You are not a citizen of their globohomo plantation of capital. You are the last born heir of the Faustian will, the solar impulse that built cathedrals, split the atom, and touched the stars.
As the empire chokes on its own lies, as the malls rot and the flags run thin, they tell themselves the Anglo-Saxon is finished; that he is effeminate, tamed, sedated by screens.
But we remember.
And as Francis Parker Yockey warned:
“When the fields of this continent are visited once again by the stern creativeness of war, the world shall see that Americans are not the weak-willed, self-interested, pleasure-mad morons that Hollywood has tried so desperately to make them.”
That time is coming, and this feast is our quiet trumpet. We eat in memory and defiance because we know what they’ve forgotten: the Saxon still lives.
Their world soon ends, and yours begins again. So cleave to your kind and kiss your wife with the pride of ten thousand winters. Raise your sons with fire in their chests and speak the old names over your meal, not in mourning, but in expectation. Because what is coming is not the end, but the clearing of the field. And we were born for the new planting.