@MichaelPatak@daniel_inskeep@stefanytrades, care to reply here since this is the original post? It's not about the teaching/mentoring for money. It's the unethical FOMO marketing that takes advantage of people.
It's absolutely wild the amount of money I've left on the table by refusing to do the most mild amount of FURU trader bullshit I see on here every day.
And for some reason, people keep making those kind of "traders" richer and richer.
@stefanytrades Teaching/Mentoring for money is fine if people want to pay. The issue was the unethical FOMO marketing structure—gating rules while showcasing selective results, and claiming a new AI that even major financial institutions couldn’t create. That was the original criticism.
@stefanytrades I noticed you didn't reply to the original post and just used a screenshot here. Camarilla pivots have been widely documented for decades. @ThorYoung "A Complete Day Trading System" already covered the same R3/S3 rotations and CP rules years ago if you need a refresher.
@MommyTradesToo@MichaelPatak@daniel_inskeep@stefanytrades Claims of deep AI development or a meaningful new edge on a transparent public method are hard to take at face value without verifiable details—like code, methodology papers, independent backtests, or evidence the university partnership produced anything unique.
@MommyTradesToo@MichaelPatak@daniel_inskeep@stefanytrades But Camarilla pivots are just a public 1989 formula based on prior high/low/close with fixed multipliers. The standard levels (R3/S3 for reversals, R4/S4 for breakouts) are well-documented, coded in countless free indicators, and discussed in books for decades.
@MommyTradesToo@MichaelPatak@daniel_inskeep@stefanytrades Camarilla pivots have been around since 1989—the math isn’t proprietary. If an AI edge meaningfully improved trading a public formula like this, large quant hedge funds with billions in research would have found and exploited it years ago.
@MommyTradesToo@MichaelPatak@daniel_inskeep@stefanytrades That’s the FOMO structure being criticized. Gating fuller rules behind paid webinars/mentorship (with Discord priority for prior students) while showcasing selective results takes advantage of people. She fits the exact example Daniel was talking about.